Enhancing trauma triage in low-resource settings using machine learning: a performance comparison with the Kampala Trauma Score

Abstract Background Traumatic injuries are a leading cause of morbidity and mortality globally, with a disproportionate impact on populations in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). The Kampala Trauma Score (KTS) is frequently used for triage in these settings, though its predictive accuracy re...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mike Nsubuga, Timothy Mwanje Kintu, Helen Please, Kelsey Stewart, Sergio M. Navarro
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2025-01-01
Series:BMC Emergency Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-025-01175-2
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832585975243472896
author Mike Nsubuga
Timothy Mwanje Kintu
Helen Please
Kelsey Stewart
Sergio M. Navarro
author_facet Mike Nsubuga
Timothy Mwanje Kintu
Helen Please
Kelsey Stewart
Sergio M. Navarro
author_sort Mike Nsubuga
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Traumatic injuries are a leading cause of morbidity and mortality globally, with a disproportionate impact on populations in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). The Kampala Trauma Score (KTS) is frequently used for triage in these settings, though its predictive accuracy remains under debate. This study evaluates the effectiveness of machine learning (ML) models in predicting triage decisions and compares their performance to the KTS. Methods Data from 4,109 trauma patients at Soroti Regional Referral Hospital, a rural hospital in Uganda, were used to train and evaluate four ML models: Logistic Regression (LR), Random Forest (RF), Gradient Boosting (GB), and Support Vector Machine (SVM). The models were assessed in regard to accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and AUC-ROC (Area Under the Curve of the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve). Additionally, a multinomial logistic regression model using the KTS was developed as a benchmark for the ML models. Results All four ML models outperformed the KTS model, with the RF and GB both achieving AUC-ROC values of 0.91, compared to 0.62 (95% CI: 0.61–0.63) for the KTS (p < 0.01). The RF model demonstrated the highest accuracy at 0.69 (95% CI: 0.68–0.70), while the KTS-based model showed an accuracy of 0.54 (95% CI: 0.52–0.55). Sex, hours to hospital, and age were identified as the most significant predictors in both ML models. Conclusion ML models demonstrated superior predictive capabilities over the KTS in predicting triage decisions, even when utilising a limited set of injury information about the patients. These findings suggest a promising opportunity to advance trauma care in LMICs by integrating ML into triage decision-making. By leveraging basic demographic and clinical data, these models could provide a foundation for improved resource allocation and patient outcomes, addressing the unique challenges of resource-limited settings. However, further validation is essential to ensure their reliability and integration into clinical practice.
format Article
id doaj-art-2da4aa7f3b074801b70430d1931879bf
institution Kabale University
issn 1471-227X
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Emergency Medicine
spelling doaj-art-2da4aa7f3b074801b70430d1931879bf2025-01-26T12:18:29ZengBMCBMC Emergency Medicine1471-227X2025-01-0125111110.1186/s12873-025-01175-2Enhancing trauma triage in low-resource settings using machine learning: a performance comparison with the Kampala Trauma ScoreMike Nsubuga0Timothy Mwanje Kintu1Helen Please2Kelsey Stewart3Sergio M. Navarro4The Infectious Diseases Institute, Makerere UniversityThe Infectious Diseases Institute, Makerere UniversityOxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustDepartment of Surgery, Mayo ClinicDepartment of Surgery, Mayo ClinicAbstract Background Traumatic injuries are a leading cause of morbidity and mortality globally, with a disproportionate impact on populations in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). The Kampala Trauma Score (KTS) is frequently used for triage in these settings, though its predictive accuracy remains under debate. This study evaluates the effectiveness of machine learning (ML) models in predicting triage decisions and compares their performance to the KTS. Methods Data from 4,109 trauma patients at Soroti Regional Referral Hospital, a rural hospital in Uganda, were used to train and evaluate four ML models: Logistic Regression (LR), Random Forest (RF), Gradient Boosting (GB), and Support Vector Machine (SVM). The models were assessed in regard to accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and AUC-ROC (Area Under the Curve of the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve). Additionally, a multinomial logistic regression model using the KTS was developed as a benchmark for the ML models. Results All four ML models outperformed the KTS model, with the RF and GB both achieving AUC-ROC values of 0.91, compared to 0.62 (95% CI: 0.61–0.63) for the KTS (p < 0.01). The RF model demonstrated the highest accuracy at 0.69 (95% CI: 0.68–0.70), while the KTS-based model showed an accuracy of 0.54 (95% CI: 0.52–0.55). Sex, hours to hospital, and age were identified as the most significant predictors in both ML models. Conclusion ML models demonstrated superior predictive capabilities over the KTS in predicting triage decisions, even when utilising a limited set of injury information about the patients. These findings suggest a promising opportunity to advance trauma care in LMICs by integrating ML into triage decision-making. By leveraging basic demographic and clinical data, these models could provide a foundation for improved resource allocation and patient outcomes, addressing the unique challenges of resource-limited settings. However, further validation is essential to ensure their reliability and integration into clinical practice.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-025-01175-2Machine learningAiTraumaTriage systemsEmergency care
spellingShingle Mike Nsubuga
Timothy Mwanje Kintu
Helen Please
Kelsey Stewart
Sergio M. Navarro
Enhancing trauma triage in low-resource settings using machine learning: a performance comparison with the Kampala Trauma Score
BMC Emergency Medicine
Machine learning
Ai
Trauma
Triage systems
Emergency care
title Enhancing trauma triage in low-resource settings using machine learning: a performance comparison with the Kampala Trauma Score
title_full Enhancing trauma triage in low-resource settings using machine learning: a performance comparison with the Kampala Trauma Score
title_fullStr Enhancing trauma triage in low-resource settings using machine learning: a performance comparison with the Kampala Trauma Score
title_full_unstemmed Enhancing trauma triage in low-resource settings using machine learning: a performance comparison with the Kampala Trauma Score
title_short Enhancing trauma triage in low-resource settings using machine learning: a performance comparison with the Kampala Trauma Score
title_sort enhancing trauma triage in low resource settings using machine learning a performance comparison with the kampala trauma score
topic Machine learning
Ai
Trauma
Triage systems
Emergency care
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-025-01175-2
work_keys_str_mv AT mikensubuga enhancingtraumatriageinlowresourcesettingsusingmachinelearningaperformancecomparisonwiththekampalatraumascore
AT timothymwanjekintu enhancingtraumatriageinlowresourcesettingsusingmachinelearningaperformancecomparisonwiththekampalatraumascore
AT helenplease enhancingtraumatriageinlowresourcesettingsusingmachinelearningaperformancecomparisonwiththekampalatraumascore
AT kelseystewart enhancingtraumatriageinlowresourcesettingsusingmachinelearningaperformancecomparisonwiththekampalatraumascore
AT sergiomnavarro enhancingtraumatriageinlowresourcesettingsusingmachinelearningaperformancecomparisonwiththekampalatraumascore