The effect of storing fiber, fiber bundle, and whole muscle in glycerinated solution on their passive elastic modulus

Abstract Storing skeletal muscle specimens in glycerinated solution is a common preservation method before biomechanical testing. This study examined the impact of glycerinated solution on passive elastic modulus in muscle tissues at three scales: fiber, fiber bundle, and whole muscle. Tensile testi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Iraj Dehghan-Hamani, Stephen H. M. Brown, Thomas R. Oxland
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Portfolio 2025-03-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-93408-4
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850207897888227328
author Iraj Dehghan-Hamani
Stephen H. M. Brown
Thomas R. Oxland
author_facet Iraj Dehghan-Hamani
Stephen H. M. Brown
Thomas R. Oxland
author_sort Iraj Dehghan-Hamani
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Storing skeletal muscle specimens in glycerinated solution is a common preservation method before biomechanical testing. This study examined the impact of glycerinated solution on passive elastic modulus in muscle tissues at three scales: fiber, fiber bundle, and whole muscle. Tensile testing was conducted on Tibialis Anterior muscle specimens obtained from nine male Sprague-Dawley rats. In total, 36 fibers, 48 fiber bundles, and 12 whole muscles were tested. Half of the specimens were tested immediately, while the other half were stored in glycerinated solution at -20 °C for 2 weeks prior to testing. The elastic moduli of all specimens were determined from stress-strain curves at 10%, 20%, and 30% strains. The results showed glycerinated solution led to about 50% decrease in elastic modulus for fibers and bundles (p < 0.001) compared to fresh muscle, while whole muscle storage caused fiber damage in the tissue center. Furthermore, the slack sarcomere length of the stored fibers and fiber bundles decreased while their cross-sectional area increased (p < 0.041). For the whole muscles, storing reduced both mass and physiological cross-sectional area of the samples (p < 0.002). These findings highlight the effect of glycerinated storage solution on muscle specimens of different sizes; and indicate that tensile testing of stored fibers and fiber bundles primarily evaluates their passive properties, while testing fresh fibers and fiber bundles assesses both passive and some active mechanical properties.
format Article
id doaj-art-2d955aa9499f4d708d51f1fac659c157
institution OA Journals
issn 2045-2322
language English
publishDate 2025-03-01
publisher Nature Portfolio
record_format Article
series Scientific Reports
spelling doaj-art-2d955aa9499f4d708d51f1fac659c1572025-08-20T02:10:21ZengNature PortfolioScientific Reports2045-23222025-03-011511810.1038/s41598-025-93408-4The effect of storing fiber, fiber bundle, and whole muscle in glycerinated solution on their passive elastic modulusIraj Dehghan-Hamani0Stephen H. M. Brown1Thomas R. Oxland2Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of British ColumbiaDepartment of Human Health and Nutritional Sciences, University of GuelphDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of British ColumbiaAbstract Storing skeletal muscle specimens in glycerinated solution is a common preservation method before biomechanical testing. This study examined the impact of glycerinated solution on passive elastic modulus in muscle tissues at three scales: fiber, fiber bundle, and whole muscle. Tensile testing was conducted on Tibialis Anterior muscle specimens obtained from nine male Sprague-Dawley rats. In total, 36 fibers, 48 fiber bundles, and 12 whole muscles were tested. Half of the specimens were tested immediately, while the other half were stored in glycerinated solution at -20 °C for 2 weeks prior to testing. The elastic moduli of all specimens were determined from stress-strain curves at 10%, 20%, and 30% strains. The results showed glycerinated solution led to about 50% decrease in elastic modulus for fibers and bundles (p < 0.001) compared to fresh muscle, while whole muscle storage caused fiber damage in the tissue center. Furthermore, the slack sarcomere length of the stored fibers and fiber bundles decreased while their cross-sectional area increased (p < 0.041). For the whole muscles, storing reduced both mass and physiological cross-sectional area of the samples (p < 0.002). These findings highlight the effect of glycerinated storage solution on muscle specimens of different sizes; and indicate that tensile testing of stored fibers and fiber bundles primarily evaluates their passive properties, while testing fresh fibers and fiber bundles assesses both passive and some active mechanical properties.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-93408-4Skeletal muscle storageGlycerinated storage solutionPassive elastic modulus
spellingShingle Iraj Dehghan-Hamani
Stephen H. M. Brown
Thomas R. Oxland
The effect of storing fiber, fiber bundle, and whole muscle in glycerinated solution on their passive elastic modulus
Scientific Reports
Skeletal muscle storage
Glycerinated storage solution
Passive elastic modulus
title The effect of storing fiber, fiber bundle, and whole muscle in glycerinated solution on their passive elastic modulus
title_full The effect of storing fiber, fiber bundle, and whole muscle in glycerinated solution on their passive elastic modulus
title_fullStr The effect of storing fiber, fiber bundle, and whole muscle in glycerinated solution on their passive elastic modulus
title_full_unstemmed The effect of storing fiber, fiber bundle, and whole muscle in glycerinated solution on their passive elastic modulus
title_short The effect of storing fiber, fiber bundle, and whole muscle in glycerinated solution on their passive elastic modulus
title_sort effect of storing fiber fiber bundle and whole muscle in glycerinated solution on their passive elastic modulus
topic Skeletal muscle storage
Glycerinated storage solution
Passive elastic modulus
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-93408-4
work_keys_str_mv AT irajdehghanhamani theeffectofstoringfiberfiberbundleandwholemuscleinglycerinatedsolutionontheirpassiveelasticmodulus
AT stephenhmbrown theeffectofstoringfiberfiberbundleandwholemuscleinglycerinatedsolutionontheirpassiveelasticmodulus
AT thomasroxland theeffectofstoringfiberfiberbundleandwholemuscleinglycerinatedsolutionontheirpassiveelasticmodulus
AT irajdehghanhamani effectofstoringfiberfiberbundleandwholemuscleinglycerinatedsolutionontheirpassiveelasticmodulus
AT stephenhmbrown effectofstoringfiberfiberbundleandwholemuscleinglycerinatedsolutionontheirpassiveelasticmodulus
AT thomasroxland effectofstoringfiberfiberbundleandwholemuscleinglycerinatedsolutionontheirpassiveelasticmodulus