Influence of observer preferences and auscultatory skill on the choice of terms to describe lung sounds: a survey of staff physicians, residents and medical students
Background In contrast with the technical progress of the stethoscope, lung sound terminology has remained confused, weakening the usefulness of auscultation. We examined how observer preferences regarding terminology and auscultatory skill influenced the choice of terms used to describe lung sounds...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2020-09-01
|
| Series: | BMJ Open Respiratory Research |
| Online Access: | https://bmjopenrespres.bmj.com/content/7/1/e000564.full |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850129508007411712 |
|---|---|
| author | Abraham Bohadana Hava Azulai Amir Jarjoui George Kalak Gabriel Izbicki |
| author_facet | Abraham Bohadana Hava Azulai Amir Jarjoui George Kalak Gabriel Izbicki |
| author_sort | Abraham Bohadana |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Background In contrast with the technical progress of the stethoscope, lung sound terminology has remained confused, weakening the usefulness of auscultation. We examined how observer preferences regarding terminology and auscultatory skill influenced the choice of terms used to describe lung sounds.Methods Thirty-one staff physicians (SP), 65 residents (R) and 47 medical students (MS) spontaneously described the audio recordings of 5 lung sounds classified acoustically as: (1) normal breath sound; (2) wheezes; (3) crackles; (4) stridor and (5) pleural friction rub. A rating was considered correct if a correct term or synonym was used to describe it (term use ascribed to preference). The use of any incorrect terms was ascribed to deficient auscultatory skill.Results Rates of correct sound identification were: (i) normal breath sound: SP=21.4%; R=11.6%; MS=17.1%; (ii) wheezes: SP=82.8%; R=85.2%; MS=86.4%; (iii) crackles: SP=63%; R=68.5%; MS=70.7%; (iv) stridor: SP=92.8%; R=90%; MS=72.1% and (v) pleural friction rub: SP=35.7%; R=6.2%; MS=3.2%. The 3 groups used 66 descriptive terms: 17 were ascribed to preferences regarding terminology, and 49 to deficient auscultatory skill. Three-group agreement on use of a term occurred on 107 occasions: 70 involved correct terms (65.4%) and 37 (34.6%) incorrect ones. Rate of use of recommended terms, rather than accepted synonyms, was 100% for the wheezes and the stridor, 55% for the normal breath sound, 22% for the crackles and 14% for the pleural friction rub.Conclusions The observers’ ability to describe lung sounds was high for the wheezes and the stridor, fair for the crackles and poor for the normal breath sound and the pleural friction rub. Lack of auscultatory skill largely surpassed observer preference as a factor determining the choice of terminology. Wide dissemination of educational programs on lung auscultation (eg, self-learning via computer-assisted learning tools) is urgently needed to promote use of standardised lung sound terminology. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-2d8f4bbad9f442db8fbccb708faacc34 |
| institution | OA Journals |
| issn | 2052-4439 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2020-09-01 |
| publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
| record_format | Article |
| series | BMJ Open Respiratory Research |
| spelling | doaj-art-2d8f4bbad9f442db8fbccb708faacc342025-08-20T02:32:57ZengBMJ Publishing GroupBMJ Open Respiratory Research2052-44392020-09-017110.1136/bmjresp-2020-000564Influence of observer preferences and auscultatory skill on the choice of terms to describe lung sounds: a survey of staff physicians, residents and medical studentsAbraham Bohadana0Hava Azulai1Amir Jarjoui2George Kalak3Gabriel Izbicki4Department of Medicine, Pulmonary Institute, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, IsraelDepartment of Medicine, Pulmonary Institute, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, IsraelDepartment of Medicine, Pulmonary Institute, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, IsraelDepartment of Medicine, Pulmonary Institute, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, IsraelDepartment of Medicine, Pulmonary Institute, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, IsraelBackground In contrast with the technical progress of the stethoscope, lung sound terminology has remained confused, weakening the usefulness of auscultation. We examined how observer preferences regarding terminology and auscultatory skill influenced the choice of terms used to describe lung sounds.Methods Thirty-one staff physicians (SP), 65 residents (R) and 47 medical students (MS) spontaneously described the audio recordings of 5 lung sounds classified acoustically as: (1) normal breath sound; (2) wheezes; (3) crackles; (4) stridor and (5) pleural friction rub. A rating was considered correct if a correct term or synonym was used to describe it (term use ascribed to preference). The use of any incorrect terms was ascribed to deficient auscultatory skill.Results Rates of correct sound identification were: (i) normal breath sound: SP=21.4%; R=11.6%; MS=17.1%; (ii) wheezes: SP=82.8%; R=85.2%; MS=86.4%; (iii) crackles: SP=63%; R=68.5%; MS=70.7%; (iv) stridor: SP=92.8%; R=90%; MS=72.1% and (v) pleural friction rub: SP=35.7%; R=6.2%; MS=3.2%. The 3 groups used 66 descriptive terms: 17 were ascribed to preferences regarding terminology, and 49 to deficient auscultatory skill. Three-group agreement on use of a term occurred on 107 occasions: 70 involved correct terms (65.4%) and 37 (34.6%) incorrect ones. Rate of use of recommended terms, rather than accepted synonyms, was 100% for the wheezes and the stridor, 55% for the normal breath sound, 22% for the crackles and 14% for the pleural friction rub.Conclusions The observers’ ability to describe lung sounds was high for the wheezes and the stridor, fair for the crackles and poor for the normal breath sound and the pleural friction rub. Lack of auscultatory skill largely surpassed observer preference as a factor determining the choice of terminology. Wide dissemination of educational programs on lung auscultation (eg, self-learning via computer-assisted learning tools) is urgently needed to promote use of standardised lung sound terminology.https://bmjopenrespres.bmj.com/content/7/1/e000564.full |
| spellingShingle | Abraham Bohadana Hava Azulai Amir Jarjoui George Kalak Gabriel Izbicki Influence of observer preferences and auscultatory skill on the choice of terms to describe lung sounds: a survey of staff physicians, residents and medical students BMJ Open Respiratory Research |
| title | Influence of observer preferences and auscultatory skill on the choice of terms to describe lung sounds: a survey of staff physicians, residents and medical students |
| title_full | Influence of observer preferences and auscultatory skill on the choice of terms to describe lung sounds: a survey of staff physicians, residents and medical students |
| title_fullStr | Influence of observer preferences and auscultatory skill on the choice of terms to describe lung sounds: a survey of staff physicians, residents and medical students |
| title_full_unstemmed | Influence of observer preferences and auscultatory skill on the choice of terms to describe lung sounds: a survey of staff physicians, residents and medical students |
| title_short | Influence of observer preferences and auscultatory skill on the choice of terms to describe lung sounds: a survey of staff physicians, residents and medical students |
| title_sort | influence of observer preferences and auscultatory skill on the choice of terms to describe lung sounds a survey of staff physicians residents and medical students |
| url | https://bmjopenrespres.bmj.com/content/7/1/e000564.full |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT abrahambohadana influenceofobserverpreferencesandauscultatoryskillonthechoiceoftermstodescribelungsoundsasurveyofstaffphysiciansresidentsandmedicalstudents AT havaazulai influenceofobserverpreferencesandauscultatoryskillonthechoiceoftermstodescribelungsoundsasurveyofstaffphysiciansresidentsandmedicalstudents AT amirjarjoui influenceofobserverpreferencesandauscultatoryskillonthechoiceoftermstodescribelungsoundsasurveyofstaffphysiciansresidentsandmedicalstudents AT georgekalak influenceofobserverpreferencesandauscultatoryskillonthechoiceoftermstodescribelungsoundsasurveyofstaffphysiciansresidentsandmedicalstudents AT gabrielizbicki influenceofobserverpreferencesandauscultatoryskillonthechoiceoftermstodescribelungsoundsasurveyofstaffphysiciansresidentsandmedicalstudents |