Editorial: The evaluation of Impact Factor in the scientific publication of criminal procedure
Generally and increasingly, governments decide to implement policy measures aimed at promoting and rewarding excellence in scientific research. This is the purpose of national research evaluation exercises, typically based on the analysis of the quality of the best research results. However, a diffe...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | Bruna Capparelli, Nereu José Giacomolli |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal
2017-10-01
|
| Series: | Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.ibraspp.com.br/revista/index.php/RBDPP/article/view/108 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Editorial: The fascination of knowledge of criminal procedural law in the age of “jurisdictional protagonism” and digital scientific communication
by: Bruna Capparelli
Published: (2017-06-01) -
Editorial: Instruments and support practices for the achievement of Open Science goals – For a review of data in Criminal Procedural Law
by: Bruna Capparelli
Published: (2018-06-01) -
Editorial: The scientific journal aim and the role of the editor in the production of knowledge in Law and in the criminal sciences.
by: Vinicius Gomes de Vasconcellos
Published: (2017-03-01) -
Editorial: Instruments and practices for Open Science in Criminal Procedure - perplexities and some possibilities
by: Bruna Capparelli, et al.
Published: (2018-03-01) -
O sistema processual penal brasileiro: acusatório, misto ou inquisitório? = The brazilian criminal procedural system: accusatory, mixed or inquisitorial?
by: Khaled Junior, Salah Hassan
Published: (2010-01-01)