Total knee arthroplasty following previous hardware implantation: do hardware removal strategies influence periprosthetic joint infections? A systematic review and meta-analysis
Purpose: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in patients who underwent previous knee surgeries can be a challenging procedure both technically and for the complication rate. Conversion TKA is affected by a higher risk of infection compared to primary TKA. The aims of this meta-analysis are i) to compare t...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Bioscientifica
2025-02-01
|
Series: | EFORT Open Reviews |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://eor.bioscientifica.com/view/journals/eor/10/2/EOR-2024-0100.xml |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1823863586637742080 |
---|---|
author | Domenico De Mauro Chiara Comisi Enrico Festa Tiziana Ascione Massimo Mariconda Giovanni Balato |
author_facet | Domenico De Mauro Chiara Comisi Enrico Festa Tiziana Ascione Massimo Mariconda Giovanni Balato |
author_sort | Domenico De Mauro |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Purpose: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in patients who underwent previous knee surgeries can be a challenging procedure both technically and for the complication rate. Conversion TKA is affected by a higher risk of infection compared to primary TKA. The aims of this meta-analysis are i) to compare the infectious risk among patients undergoing TKA after a prior hardware implantation, evaluating removal vs maintenance of the hardware, and ii) within the removal group, to compare staged vs concurrent procedure. Methods: In accordance with the PRISMA guidelines, a systematic literature review was conducted up to January 2024. The review was registered in the PROSPERO database: CRD42024510444. The inclusion criteria comprised the following: i) patients aged 18 years or older, ii) individuals who had undergone total knee replacement and iii) those with a history of prior nonabsorbable hardware implantation. The pooled incidence of periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) was reported using odds ratios with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: The investigation of database and references identified 284 studies. PJI risks differed significantly among groups, with a higher risk in the removal group (z = 3.5630, P = 0.0004). Furthermore, within the removal group, the risk of PJI was lower in cases of staged removal compared to concurrent removal (z = 2.0931, P = 0.0363). Conclusions: TKA following a previous knee hardware implantation indicates a higher PJI risk when the hardware is removed compared to leaving it in place. If hardware removal is necessary, staged removal is recommended. The presence of minor hardware is the only scenario where, if removal is necessary, one-stage approach is preferred. |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-2d0f8d2d65c44fc0820a00abe752c546 |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 2058-5241 |
language | English |
publishDate | 2025-02-01 |
publisher | Bioscientifica |
record_format | Article |
series | EFORT Open Reviews |
spelling | doaj-art-2d0f8d2d65c44fc0820a00abe752c5462025-02-09T12:02:29ZengBioscientificaEFORT Open Reviews2058-52412025-02-011029510310.1530/EOR-24-01001Total knee arthroplasty following previous hardware implantation: do hardware removal strategies influence periprosthetic joint infections? A systematic review and meta-analysisDomenico De Mauro0Chiara Comisi1Enrico Festa2Tiziana Ascione3Massimo Mariconda4Giovanni Balato5Orthopedics and Traumatology Unit, Department of Public Health, “Federico II” University, Naples, ItalyDepartment of Orthopedics and Rheumatological Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, ItalyOrthopedics and Traumatology Unit, Department of Public Health, “Federico II” University, Naples, ItalyService of Infectious Diseases, AORN Antonio Cardarelli Hospital, Naples, ItalyOrthopedics and Traumatology Unit, Department of Public Health, “Federico II” University, Naples, ItalyOrthopedics and Traumatology Unit, Department of Public Health, “Federico II” University, Naples, ItalyPurpose: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in patients who underwent previous knee surgeries can be a challenging procedure both technically and for the complication rate. Conversion TKA is affected by a higher risk of infection compared to primary TKA. The aims of this meta-analysis are i) to compare the infectious risk among patients undergoing TKA after a prior hardware implantation, evaluating removal vs maintenance of the hardware, and ii) within the removal group, to compare staged vs concurrent procedure. Methods: In accordance with the PRISMA guidelines, a systematic literature review was conducted up to January 2024. The review was registered in the PROSPERO database: CRD42024510444. The inclusion criteria comprised the following: i) patients aged 18 years or older, ii) individuals who had undergone total knee replacement and iii) those with a history of prior nonabsorbable hardware implantation. The pooled incidence of periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) was reported using odds ratios with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: The investigation of database and references identified 284 studies. PJI risks differed significantly among groups, with a higher risk in the removal group (z = 3.5630, P = 0.0004). Furthermore, within the removal group, the risk of PJI was lower in cases of staged removal compared to concurrent removal (z = 2.0931, P = 0.0363). Conclusions: TKA following a previous knee hardware implantation indicates a higher PJI risk when the hardware is removed compared to leaving it in place. If hardware removal is necessary, staged removal is recommended. The presence of minor hardware is the only scenario where, if removal is necessary, one-stage approach is preferred.https://eor.bioscientifica.com/view/journals/eor/10/2/EOR-2024-0100.xmltotal knee arthroplastyhardware removalperiprosthetic jointinfectionconversion tka |
spellingShingle | Domenico De Mauro Chiara Comisi Enrico Festa Tiziana Ascione Massimo Mariconda Giovanni Balato Total knee arthroplasty following previous hardware implantation: do hardware removal strategies influence periprosthetic joint infections? A systematic review and meta-analysis EFORT Open Reviews total knee arthroplasty hardware removal periprosthetic joint infection conversion tka |
title | Total knee arthroplasty following previous hardware implantation: do hardware removal strategies influence periprosthetic joint infections? A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Total knee arthroplasty following previous hardware implantation: do hardware removal strategies influence periprosthetic joint infections? A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Total knee arthroplasty following previous hardware implantation: do hardware removal strategies influence periprosthetic joint infections? A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Total knee arthroplasty following previous hardware implantation: do hardware removal strategies influence periprosthetic joint infections? A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Total knee arthroplasty following previous hardware implantation: do hardware removal strategies influence periprosthetic joint infections? A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | total knee arthroplasty following previous hardware implantation do hardware removal strategies influence periprosthetic joint infections a systematic review and meta analysis |
topic | total knee arthroplasty hardware removal periprosthetic joint infection conversion tka |
url | https://eor.bioscientifica.com/view/journals/eor/10/2/EOR-2024-0100.xml |
work_keys_str_mv | AT domenicodemauro totalkneearthroplastyfollowingprevioushardwareimplantationdohardwareremovalstrategiesinfluenceperiprostheticjointinfectionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT chiaracomisi totalkneearthroplastyfollowingprevioushardwareimplantationdohardwareremovalstrategiesinfluenceperiprostheticjointinfectionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT enricofesta totalkneearthroplastyfollowingprevioushardwareimplantationdohardwareremovalstrategiesinfluenceperiprostheticjointinfectionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT tizianaascione totalkneearthroplastyfollowingprevioushardwareimplantationdohardwareremovalstrategiesinfluenceperiprostheticjointinfectionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT massimomariconda totalkneearthroplastyfollowingprevioushardwareimplantationdohardwareremovalstrategiesinfluenceperiprostheticjointinfectionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT giovannibalato totalkneearthroplastyfollowingprevioushardwareimplantationdohardwareremovalstrategiesinfluenceperiprostheticjointinfectionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |