Patterns of genomic instability in > 2000 patients with ovarian cancer across six clinical trials evaluating olaparib

Abstract Background The introduction of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors represented a paradigm shift in the treatment of ovarian cancer. Genomic data from patients with high-grade ovarian cancer in six phase II/III trials involving the PARP inhibitor olaparib were analyzed to better un...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alan Barnicle, Isabelle Ray-Coquard, Etienne Rouleau, Karen Cadoo, Fiona Simpkins, Carol Aghajanian, Alexandra Leary, Andrés Poveda, Stephanie Lheureux, Eric Pujade-Lauraine, Benoit You, Jonathan Ledermann, Ursula Matulonis, Charlie Gourley, Kirsten M. Timms, Zhongwu Lai, Darren R. Hodgson, Cathy E. Elks, Simon Dearden, Coumaran Egile, Pierre Lao-Sirieix, Elizabeth A. Harrington, Jessica S. Brown
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2024-12-01
Series:Genome Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13073-024-01413-5
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1846112329426534400
author Alan Barnicle
Isabelle Ray-Coquard
Etienne Rouleau
Karen Cadoo
Fiona Simpkins
Carol Aghajanian
Alexandra Leary
Andrés Poveda
Stephanie Lheureux
Eric Pujade-Lauraine
Benoit You
Jonathan Ledermann
Ursula Matulonis
Charlie Gourley
Kirsten M. Timms
Zhongwu Lai
Darren R. Hodgson
Cathy E. Elks
Simon Dearden
Coumaran Egile
Pierre Lao-Sirieix
Elizabeth A. Harrington
Jessica S. Brown
author_facet Alan Barnicle
Isabelle Ray-Coquard
Etienne Rouleau
Karen Cadoo
Fiona Simpkins
Carol Aghajanian
Alexandra Leary
Andrés Poveda
Stephanie Lheureux
Eric Pujade-Lauraine
Benoit You
Jonathan Ledermann
Ursula Matulonis
Charlie Gourley
Kirsten M. Timms
Zhongwu Lai
Darren R. Hodgson
Cathy E. Elks
Simon Dearden
Coumaran Egile
Pierre Lao-Sirieix
Elizabeth A. Harrington
Jessica S. Brown
author_sort Alan Barnicle
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background The introduction of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors represented a paradigm shift in the treatment of ovarian cancer. Genomic data from patients with high-grade ovarian cancer in six phase II/III trials involving the PARP inhibitor olaparib were analyzed to better understand patterns and potential causes of genomic instability. Patients and methods Homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) was assessed in 2147 tumor samples from SOLO1, PAOLA-1, Study 19, SOLO2, OPINION, and LIGHT using next-generation sequencing technology. Genomic instability scores (GIS) were assessed in BRCA1 and/or BRCA2 (BRCA)-mutated (BRCAm), non-BRCA homologous recombination repair-mutated (non-BRCA HRRm), and non-HRRm tumors. Results BRCAm was identified in 1021/2147 (47.6%) tumors. BRCAm tumors had significantly higher GIS than non-BRCAm tumors (P < 0.001) and high biallelic loss (815/838; 97.3%) regardless of germline (658/672; 97.9%) or somatic (101/108; 93.5%) BRCAm status. In non-BRCA HRRm tumors (n = 121) a similar proportion were HRD-positive (GIS ≥ 42: 55/121; 45.5%) relative to HRD-negative (GIS < 42: 52/121; 43.0%). GIS was highly variable in non-BRCA HRRm (median 42 [interquartile range (IQR) 29–58]) and non-HRRm (n = 1005; median 32 [IQR 20–55]) tumors. Gene mutations with high GIS included HRR genes BRIP1 (median 46 [IQR 41–58]), RAD51C (median 58 [IQR 48–66]), RAD51D (median 62 [IQR 54–69]), and PALB2 (median 64 [IQR 58–74]), and non-HRR genes NF1 (median 49 [IQR 25–60]) and RB1 (median 55 [IQR 30–71]). CCNE1-amplified and PIK3CA-mutated tumors had low GIS (CCNE1-amplified: median 24 [IQR 18–29]; PIK3CA-mutated: median 32 [IQR 14–52]) and were predominantly non-BRCAm. Conclusions These analyses provide valuable insight into patterns of genomic instability and potential drivers of HRD, besides BRCAm, in ovarian cancer and will help guide future research into the potential clinical effectiveness of anti-cancer treatments in ovarian cancer, including PARP inhibitors as well as other precision oncology agents. Trial registration The SOLO1 trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01844986) on April 30, 2013; the PAOLA-1 trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02477644) on June 18, 2015 (retrospectively registered); Study 19 was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00753545) on September 12, 2008 (retrospectively registered); the SOLO2 trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01874353) on June 7, 2013; the OPINION trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03402841) on January 3, 2018; the LIGHT trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02983799) on November 4, 2016.
format Article
id doaj-art-2cc22ceb55de4044a920709aead2f670
institution Kabale University
issn 1756-994X
language English
publishDate 2024-12-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Genome Medicine
spelling doaj-art-2cc22ceb55de4044a920709aead2f6702024-12-22T12:39:19ZengBMCGenome Medicine1756-994X2024-12-0116111610.1186/s13073-024-01413-5Patterns of genomic instability in > 2000 patients with ovarian cancer across six clinical trials evaluating olaparibAlan Barnicle0Isabelle Ray-Coquard1Etienne Rouleau2Karen Cadoo3Fiona Simpkins4Carol Aghajanian5Alexandra Leary6Andrés Poveda7Stephanie Lheureux8Eric Pujade-Lauraine9Benoit You10Jonathan Ledermann11Ursula Matulonis12Charlie Gourley13Kirsten M. Timms14Zhongwu Lai15Darren R. Hodgson16Cathy E. Elks17Simon Dearden18Coumaran Egile19Pierre Lao-Sirieix20Elizabeth A. Harrington21Jessica S. Brown22Translational Medicine, Oncology R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge Biomedical CampusMedical Oncology Department, Centre Léon Bérard and University Claude Bernard Lyon, and Groupe d’Investigateurs Nationaux pour l’Etude des Cancers Ovariens (GINECO)Department of Medical Biology and Pathology, Gustave Roussy, Cancer Genetics Laboratory, Gustave RoussyMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Jordan Center for Gynecologic Oncology at the Abramson Cancer Center, University of PennsylvaniaMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterInstitut Gustave Roussy, and GINECOInitia Oncology, Hospital QuironsaludDepartment of Medical Oncology, Princess Margaret HospitalAssociation de Recherche Cancers Gynécologiques (ARCAGY)-GINECO, and GINECOMedical Oncology, IC-HCL, EPSILYONUCL Cancer Institute, University College London and UCL HospitalsDana-Farber Cancer InstituteCancer Research UK Scotland Centre, University of EdinburghMyriad GeneticsTranslational Medicine, Oncology R&D, Research and Early Development, AstraZenecaTranslational Medicine, Oncology R&D, Research and Early Development, AstraZenecaPrecision Medicine and Biosamples, Oncology R&D, AstraZenecaPrecision Medicine and Biosamples, Oncology R&D, AstraZenecaPrecision Medicine and Biosamples, Oncology R&D, AstraZenecaPrecision Medicine and Biosamples, Oncology R&D, AstraZenecaTranslational Medicine, Oncology R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge Biomedical CampusTranslational Medicine, Oncology R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge Biomedical CampusAbstract Background The introduction of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors represented a paradigm shift in the treatment of ovarian cancer. Genomic data from patients with high-grade ovarian cancer in six phase II/III trials involving the PARP inhibitor olaparib were analyzed to better understand patterns and potential causes of genomic instability. Patients and methods Homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) was assessed in 2147 tumor samples from SOLO1, PAOLA-1, Study 19, SOLO2, OPINION, and LIGHT using next-generation sequencing technology. Genomic instability scores (GIS) were assessed in BRCA1 and/or BRCA2 (BRCA)-mutated (BRCAm), non-BRCA homologous recombination repair-mutated (non-BRCA HRRm), and non-HRRm tumors. Results BRCAm was identified in 1021/2147 (47.6%) tumors. BRCAm tumors had significantly higher GIS than non-BRCAm tumors (P < 0.001) and high biallelic loss (815/838; 97.3%) regardless of germline (658/672; 97.9%) or somatic (101/108; 93.5%) BRCAm status. In non-BRCA HRRm tumors (n = 121) a similar proportion were HRD-positive (GIS ≥ 42: 55/121; 45.5%) relative to HRD-negative (GIS < 42: 52/121; 43.0%). GIS was highly variable in non-BRCA HRRm (median 42 [interquartile range (IQR) 29–58]) and non-HRRm (n = 1005; median 32 [IQR 20–55]) tumors. Gene mutations with high GIS included HRR genes BRIP1 (median 46 [IQR 41–58]), RAD51C (median 58 [IQR 48–66]), RAD51D (median 62 [IQR 54–69]), and PALB2 (median 64 [IQR 58–74]), and non-HRR genes NF1 (median 49 [IQR 25–60]) and RB1 (median 55 [IQR 30–71]). CCNE1-amplified and PIK3CA-mutated tumors had low GIS (CCNE1-amplified: median 24 [IQR 18–29]; PIK3CA-mutated: median 32 [IQR 14–52]) and were predominantly non-BRCAm. Conclusions These analyses provide valuable insight into patterns of genomic instability and potential drivers of HRD, besides BRCAm, in ovarian cancer and will help guide future research into the potential clinical effectiveness of anti-cancer treatments in ovarian cancer, including PARP inhibitors as well as other precision oncology agents. Trial registration The SOLO1 trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01844986) on April 30, 2013; the PAOLA-1 trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02477644) on June 18, 2015 (retrospectively registered); Study 19 was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00753545) on September 12, 2008 (retrospectively registered); the SOLO2 trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01874353) on June 7, 2013; the OPINION trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03402841) on January 3, 2018; the LIGHT trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02983799) on November 4, 2016.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13073-024-01413-5Ovarian cancerGenomic instabilityTranslational researchOlaparib
spellingShingle Alan Barnicle
Isabelle Ray-Coquard
Etienne Rouleau
Karen Cadoo
Fiona Simpkins
Carol Aghajanian
Alexandra Leary
Andrés Poveda
Stephanie Lheureux
Eric Pujade-Lauraine
Benoit You
Jonathan Ledermann
Ursula Matulonis
Charlie Gourley
Kirsten M. Timms
Zhongwu Lai
Darren R. Hodgson
Cathy E. Elks
Simon Dearden
Coumaran Egile
Pierre Lao-Sirieix
Elizabeth A. Harrington
Jessica S. Brown
Patterns of genomic instability in > 2000 patients with ovarian cancer across six clinical trials evaluating olaparib
Genome Medicine
Ovarian cancer
Genomic instability
Translational research
Olaparib
title Patterns of genomic instability in > 2000 patients with ovarian cancer across six clinical trials evaluating olaparib
title_full Patterns of genomic instability in > 2000 patients with ovarian cancer across six clinical trials evaluating olaparib
title_fullStr Patterns of genomic instability in > 2000 patients with ovarian cancer across six clinical trials evaluating olaparib
title_full_unstemmed Patterns of genomic instability in > 2000 patients with ovarian cancer across six clinical trials evaluating olaparib
title_short Patterns of genomic instability in > 2000 patients with ovarian cancer across six clinical trials evaluating olaparib
title_sort patterns of genomic instability in 2000 patients with ovarian cancer across six clinical trials evaluating olaparib
topic Ovarian cancer
Genomic instability
Translational research
Olaparib
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s13073-024-01413-5
work_keys_str_mv AT alanbarnicle patternsofgenomicinstabilityin2000patientswithovariancanceracrosssixclinicaltrialsevaluatingolaparib
AT isabelleraycoquard patternsofgenomicinstabilityin2000patientswithovariancanceracrosssixclinicaltrialsevaluatingolaparib
AT etiennerouleau patternsofgenomicinstabilityin2000patientswithovariancanceracrosssixclinicaltrialsevaluatingolaparib
AT karencadoo patternsofgenomicinstabilityin2000patientswithovariancanceracrosssixclinicaltrialsevaluatingolaparib
AT fionasimpkins patternsofgenomicinstabilityin2000patientswithovariancanceracrosssixclinicaltrialsevaluatingolaparib
AT carolaghajanian patternsofgenomicinstabilityin2000patientswithovariancanceracrosssixclinicaltrialsevaluatingolaparib
AT alexandraleary patternsofgenomicinstabilityin2000patientswithovariancanceracrosssixclinicaltrialsevaluatingolaparib
AT andrespoveda patternsofgenomicinstabilityin2000patientswithovariancanceracrosssixclinicaltrialsevaluatingolaparib
AT stephanielheureux patternsofgenomicinstabilityin2000patientswithovariancanceracrosssixclinicaltrialsevaluatingolaparib
AT ericpujadelauraine patternsofgenomicinstabilityin2000patientswithovariancanceracrosssixclinicaltrialsevaluatingolaparib
AT benoityou patternsofgenomicinstabilityin2000patientswithovariancanceracrosssixclinicaltrialsevaluatingolaparib
AT jonathanledermann patternsofgenomicinstabilityin2000patientswithovariancanceracrosssixclinicaltrialsevaluatingolaparib
AT ursulamatulonis patternsofgenomicinstabilityin2000patientswithovariancanceracrosssixclinicaltrialsevaluatingolaparib
AT charliegourley patternsofgenomicinstabilityin2000patientswithovariancanceracrosssixclinicaltrialsevaluatingolaparib
AT kirstenmtimms patternsofgenomicinstabilityin2000patientswithovariancanceracrosssixclinicaltrialsevaluatingolaparib
AT zhongwulai patternsofgenomicinstabilityin2000patientswithovariancanceracrosssixclinicaltrialsevaluatingolaparib
AT darrenrhodgson patternsofgenomicinstabilityin2000patientswithovariancanceracrosssixclinicaltrialsevaluatingolaparib
AT cathyeelks patternsofgenomicinstabilityin2000patientswithovariancanceracrosssixclinicaltrialsevaluatingolaparib
AT simondearden patternsofgenomicinstabilityin2000patientswithovariancanceracrosssixclinicaltrialsevaluatingolaparib
AT coumaranegile patternsofgenomicinstabilityin2000patientswithovariancanceracrosssixclinicaltrialsevaluatingolaparib
AT pierrelaosirieix patternsofgenomicinstabilityin2000patientswithovariancanceracrosssixclinicaltrialsevaluatingolaparib
AT elizabethaharrington patternsofgenomicinstabilityin2000patientswithovariancanceracrosssixclinicaltrialsevaluatingolaparib
AT jessicasbrown patternsofgenomicinstabilityin2000patientswithovariancanceracrosssixclinicaltrialsevaluatingolaparib