Gouvernance urbaine et critique dans les métropoles européennes : une posture méthodologique pour étudier les effets des mouvements sociaux sur les politiques publiques

The urban governance approach has often been denounced as playing the game of neoliberalism through the neutralization of power relations, hierarchies and the detrimental effects of the intervention of private actors in the design of public policies. Contrary to these criticisms, in this article we...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Thomas Aguilera
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Métropoles 2018-10-01
Series:Métropoles
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.openedition.org/metropoles/5789
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849707171060645888
author Thomas Aguilera
author_facet Thomas Aguilera
author_sort Thomas Aguilera
collection DOAJ
description The urban governance approach has often been denounced as playing the game of neoliberalism through the neutralization of power relations, hierarchies and the detrimental effects of the intervention of private actors in the design of public policies. Contrary to these criticisms, in this article we defend the idea that approaches in terms of governance, on the contrary, are particularly conducive to research on criticism and urban protests. We defend the governance approach as a methodological posture and not as a result: this approach makes it possible to empirically explore the complexity of the relationships between actors carrying diverging interests at multiple scales, in polycentric spaces, without presupposing hierarchies a priori between actors and potential domination situations, but without de-politicizing their relations. This approach is particularly fruitful for thinking about the effects of protests on public policies. We present the modalities of its operationalization with a multi-situated and comparative ethnography of squatter movements in Paris and Madrid. Finally, the article makes two arguments. On the one hand, it shows that criticism and approach by urban governance are not incompatible, but allow the complexity of relations between protesters and decision-makers to be accounted for. On the other hand, it shows the contribution of this approach to the analysis of social movements, especially to think about their effects on public policies.
format Article
id doaj-art-2ca6c4926d4944eaa967133c7e92ce2a
institution DOAJ
issn 1957-7788
language English
publishDate 2018-10-01
publisher Métropoles
record_format Article
series Métropoles
spelling doaj-art-2ca6c4926d4944eaa967133c7e92ce2a2025-08-20T03:16:00ZengMétropolesMétropoles1957-77882018-10-01201810.4000/metropoles.5789Gouvernance urbaine et critique dans les métropoles européennes : une posture méthodologique pour étudier les effets des mouvements sociaux sur les politiques publiquesThomas AguileraThe urban governance approach has often been denounced as playing the game of neoliberalism through the neutralization of power relations, hierarchies and the detrimental effects of the intervention of private actors in the design of public policies. Contrary to these criticisms, in this article we defend the idea that approaches in terms of governance, on the contrary, are particularly conducive to research on criticism and urban protests. We defend the governance approach as a methodological posture and not as a result: this approach makes it possible to empirically explore the complexity of the relationships between actors carrying diverging interests at multiple scales, in polycentric spaces, without presupposing hierarchies a priori between actors and potential domination situations, but without de-politicizing their relations. This approach is particularly fruitful for thinking about the effects of protests on public policies. We present the modalities of its operationalization with a multi-situated and comparative ethnography of squatter movements in Paris and Madrid. Finally, the article makes two arguments. On the one hand, it shows that criticism and approach by urban governance are not incompatible, but allow the complexity of relations between protesters and decision-makers to be accounted for. On the other hand, it shows the contribution of this approach to the analysis of social movements, especially to think about their effects on public policies.https://journals.openedition.org/metropoles/5789squatsurban governancecritical urban theorysocial movementscomparison Paris-Madrid
spellingShingle Thomas Aguilera
Gouvernance urbaine et critique dans les métropoles européennes : une posture méthodologique pour étudier les effets des mouvements sociaux sur les politiques publiques
Métropoles
squats
urban governance
critical urban theory
social movements
comparison Paris-Madrid
title Gouvernance urbaine et critique dans les métropoles européennes : une posture méthodologique pour étudier les effets des mouvements sociaux sur les politiques publiques
title_full Gouvernance urbaine et critique dans les métropoles européennes : une posture méthodologique pour étudier les effets des mouvements sociaux sur les politiques publiques
title_fullStr Gouvernance urbaine et critique dans les métropoles européennes : une posture méthodologique pour étudier les effets des mouvements sociaux sur les politiques publiques
title_full_unstemmed Gouvernance urbaine et critique dans les métropoles européennes : une posture méthodologique pour étudier les effets des mouvements sociaux sur les politiques publiques
title_short Gouvernance urbaine et critique dans les métropoles européennes : une posture méthodologique pour étudier les effets des mouvements sociaux sur les politiques publiques
title_sort gouvernance urbaine et critique dans les metropoles europeennes une posture methodologique pour etudier les effets des mouvements sociaux sur les politiques publiques
topic squats
urban governance
critical urban theory
social movements
comparison Paris-Madrid
url https://journals.openedition.org/metropoles/5789
work_keys_str_mv AT thomasaguilera gouvernanceurbaineetcritiquedanslesmetropoleseuropeennesuneposturemethodologiquepouretudierleseffetsdesmouvementssociauxsurlespolitiquespubliques