Assessment of Vegetation Indices Derived from UAV Imagery for Weed Detection in Vineyards
This study aimed to detect weeds in vineyards throughout the crop cycle using pixel-based classification of RGB imagery captured by unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). Five vegetation indices (NGRDI, NDVI, GLI, NDRE, and GNDVI) and three supervised classifiers (SVM, RT, and KNN) were evaluated during f...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MDPI AG
2025-05-01
|
| Series: | Remote Sensing |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/17/11/1899 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | This study aimed to detect weeds in vineyards throughout the crop cycle using pixel-based classification of RGB imagery captured by unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). Five vegetation indices (NGRDI, NDVI, GLI, NDRE, and GNDVI) and three supervised classifiers (SVM, RT, and KNN) were evaluated during four flight campaigns. Classification performance was assessed using precision, recall, and F1-Score, supported by descriptive statistics (mean, standard deviation, and 95% confidence interval), inferential tests (Shapiro–Wilk, ANOVA, and Kruskal–Wallis), and visual map inspection. Statistical analyses, both descriptive and inferential, did not indicate significant differences between classification methods. NGRDI consistently showed strong performance, especially for vine and soil classes, and effectively detected weeds, with F1-Scores above 0.78 in some campaigns, occasionally outperforming the supervised classifiers. GLI displayed variable results and a higher sensitivity to noise, whereas NDVI showed limitations when applied to RGB data, particularly in sparsely vegetated areas. Among the classifiers, the SVM achieved the highest F1-Score for vine (0.9330) and soil (0.9231), whereas KNN produced balanced results and visually coherent maps. RT showed lower accuracy and greater variability, particularly in the weed class. Despite the lack of statistically significant differences, visual analysis favored NGRDI and SVM for generating cleaner classification outputs. Study limitations include lighting variability, reduced spatial coverage owing to low flight altitude, and a lack of spatial context in pixel-based methods. Future research should explore object-based approaches and advanced classifiers (e.g., Random Forest and Convolutional Neural Networks) to enhance robustness and generalization. Overall, RGB-based indices, particularly NGRDI, are cost-effective and reliable tools for weed detection, thereby supporting scalable precision in viticulture. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2072-4292 |