Effectiveness and safety of different types of ablation modalities in patients with atrial fibrillation: a bayesian network meta-analysis from randomized controlled trials

Abstract Introduction Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia, which significantly contributes to morbidity, mortality, and a diminished quality of life. Despite advancements in pharmacological treatments, many AF patients do not achieve adequate symptom control with oral medi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Fan Maitri Aldian, Visuddho Visuddho, Bendix Samarta Witarto, Andro Pramana Witarto, Jason Oktavian Hartanto, Yan Efrata Sembiring, Jeswant Dillon
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2025-05-01
Series:Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-025-03460-4
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849314700966232064
author Fan Maitri Aldian
Visuddho Visuddho
Bendix Samarta Witarto
Andro Pramana Witarto
Jason Oktavian Hartanto
Yan Efrata Sembiring
Jeswant Dillon
author_facet Fan Maitri Aldian
Visuddho Visuddho
Bendix Samarta Witarto
Andro Pramana Witarto
Jason Oktavian Hartanto
Yan Efrata Sembiring
Jeswant Dillon
author_sort Fan Maitri Aldian
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Introduction Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia, which significantly contributes to morbidity, mortality, and a diminished quality of life. Despite advancements in pharmacological treatments, many AF patients do not achieve adequate symptom control with oral medications. This network meta-analysis seeks to provide comprehensive evidence to guide clinical decision-making and optimize ablation strategies for patients with atrial fibrillation. Methods This network meta-analysis (NMA) was conducted in accordance to PRISMA NMA Checklist of Items (PROSPERO No. CRD42024577782). A comprehensive search was performed across major literature databases (PubMed, Scopus, CENTRAL, ProQuest, and Web of Science) up to July 10, 2024. Data analyses were performed using Rstudio v.4.4.1 employing Bayesian NMA with random-effects models. Sensitivity, subgroup, and network meta-regression analyses were also conducted. SUCRA values were estimated to present the ranking of each treatment in the network. Meta-proportions with GLMM (Generalized Linear Mixed Model) also performed to analyze the safety outcomes. Results A total of 6332 AF patients from 46 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included. NMA demonstrate epicardial (surgical) approach, especially video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) (OR 1.54; 95%CrI [1.03,2.38]; SUCRA 89.61) exhibited superiority to reduce the AF recurrence in AF patients. Hybrid epicardial-endocardial ablation (OR 1.51; 95% CrI [0.82,2.82]; SUCRA 85.7) had a similar freedom from AF rate to VATS. Subgroup and network meta-regression analysis revealed that AF type ((β -0.415; [-0.776;-0.042]) and AF duration (β 0.602; [0.066;1.079]) influence the freedom from AF rate. Meta-proportion indicated that surgical or hybrid ablation exhibited a higher risk of mortality (Prop = 5.07%), pericardial effusion (Prop = 4.35%), and phrenic nerve injury (Prop = 4.35%). Conclusion NMA demonstrated higher effectiveness of VATS and hybrid ablation in reducing the recurrence rate of AF. Despite complications associated with surgical and hybrid approaches have higher prevalence, type of complications encountered in this approaches are less diverse.
format Article
id doaj-art-2c86b4ce4fe84b23848f1d11cb2c50a9
institution Kabale University
issn 1749-8090
language English
publishDate 2025-05-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
spelling doaj-art-2c86b4ce4fe84b23848f1d11cb2c50a92025-08-20T03:52:23ZengBMCJournal of Cardiothoracic Surgery1749-80902025-05-0120111510.1186/s13019-025-03460-4Effectiveness and safety of different types of ablation modalities in patients with atrial fibrillation: a bayesian network meta-analysis from randomized controlled trialsFan Maitri Aldian0Visuddho Visuddho1Bendix Samarta Witarto2Andro Pramana Witarto3Jason Oktavian Hartanto4Yan Efrata Sembiring5Jeswant Dillon6Faculty of Medicine, Universitas AirlanggaFaculty of Medicine, Universitas AirlanggaFaculty of Medicine, Universitas AirlanggaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas AirlanggaFaculty of Medicine, Universitas AirlanggaDepartment of Thoracic Cardiac and Vascular Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Dr. Soetomo General Academic HospitalDepartment of Thoracic Cardiac and Vascular Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas AirlanggaAbstract Introduction Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia, which significantly contributes to morbidity, mortality, and a diminished quality of life. Despite advancements in pharmacological treatments, many AF patients do not achieve adequate symptom control with oral medications. This network meta-analysis seeks to provide comprehensive evidence to guide clinical decision-making and optimize ablation strategies for patients with atrial fibrillation. Methods This network meta-analysis (NMA) was conducted in accordance to PRISMA NMA Checklist of Items (PROSPERO No. CRD42024577782). A comprehensive search was performed across major literature databases (PubMed, Scopus, CENTRAL, ProQuest, and Web of Science) up to July 10, 2024. Data analyses were performed using Rstudio v.4.4.1 employing Bayesian NMA with random-effects models. Sensitivity, subgroup, and network meta-regression analyses were also conducted. SUCRA values were estimated to present the ranking of each treatment in the network. Meta-proportions with GLMM (Generalized Linear Mixed Model) also performed to analyze the safety outcomes. Results A total of 6332 AF patients from 46 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included. NMA demonstrate epicardial (surgical) approach, especially video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) (OR 1.54; 95%CrI [1.03,2.38]; SUCRA 89.61) exhibited superiority to reduce the AF recurrence in AF patients. Hybrid epicardial-endocardial ablation (OR 1.51; 95% CrI [0.82,2.82]; SUCRA 85.7) had a similar freedom from AF rate to VATS. Subgroup and network meta-regression analysis revealed that AF type ((β -0.415; [-0.776;-0.042]) and AF duration (β 0.602; [0.066;1.079]) influence the freedom from AF rate. Meta-proportion indicated that surgical or hybrid ablation exhibited a higher risk of mortality (Prop = 5.07%), pericardial effusion (Prop = 4.35%), and phrenic nerve injury (Prop = 4.35%). Conclusion NMA demonstrated higher effectiveness of VATS and hybrid ablation in reducing the recurrence rate of AF. Despite complications associated with surgical and hybrid approaches have higher prevalence, type of complications encountered in this approaches are less diverse.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-025-03460-4Atrial fibrillationCatheter ablationSurgical ablation
spellingShingle Fan Maitri Aldian
Visuddho Visuddho
Bendix Samarta Witarto
Andro Pramana Witarto
Jason Oktavian Hartanto
Yan Efrata Sembiring
Jeswant Dillon
Effectiveness and safety of different types of ablation modalities in patients with atrial fibrillation: a bayesian network meta-analysis from randomized controlled trials
Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
Atrial fibrillation
Catheter ablation
Surgical ablation
title Effectiveness and safety of different types of ablation modalities in patients with atrial fibrillation: a bayesian network meta-analysis from randomized controlled trials
title_full Effectiveness and safety of different types of ablation modalities in patients with atrial fibrillation: a bayesian network meta-analysis from randomized controlled trials
title_fullStr Effectiveness and safety of different types of ablation modalities in patients with atrial fibrillation: a bayesian network meta-analysis from randomized controlled trials
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness and safety of different types of ablation modalities in patients with atrial fibrillation: a bayesian network meta-analysis from randomized controlled trials
title_short Effectiveness and safety of different types of ablation modalities in patients with atrial fibrillation: a bayesian network meta-analysis from randomized controlled trials
title_sort effectiveness and safety of different types of ablation modalities in patients with atrial fibrillation a bayesian network meta analysis from randomized controlled trials
topic Atrial fibrillation
Catheter ablation
Surgical ablation
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-025-03460-4
work_keys_str_mv AT fanmaitrialdian effectivenessandsafetyofdifferenttypesofablationmodalitiesinpatientswithatrialfibrillationabayesiannetworkmetaanalysisfromrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT visuddhovisuddho effectivenessandsafetyofdifferenttypesofablationmodalitiesinpatientswithatrialfibrillationabayesiannetworkmetaanalysisfromrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT bendixsamartawitarto effectivenessandsafetyofdifferenttypesofablationmodalitiesinpatientswithatrialfibrillationabayesiannetworkmetaanalysisfromrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT andropramanawitarto effectivenessandsafetyofdifferenttypesofablationmodalitiesinpatientswithatrialfibrillationabayesiannetworkmetaanalysisfromrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT jasonoktavianhartanto effectivenessandsafetyofdifferenttypesofablationmodalitiesinpatientswithatrialfibrillationabayesiannetworkmetaanalysisfromrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT yanefratasembiring effectivenessandsafetyofdifferenttypesofablationmodalitiesinpatientswithatrialfibrillationabayesiannetworkmetaanalysisfromrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT jeswantdillon effectivenessandsafetyofdifferenttypesofablationmodalitiesinpatientswithatrialfibrillationabayesiannetworkmetaanalysisfromrandomizedcontrolledtrials