Transformation of commemorative practices in Ukrainian historical discourse

The article is devoted to the study of changes taking place in Ukrainian society in the field of content of historical memory and forms of commemorative practices. The purpose of the study is to identify the main trends in transformations of the form and content of commemorative practices in the Uk...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Roman Dodonov
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Borys Grinchenko Kyiv Metropolitan University 2022-04-01
Series:Cхід
Subjects:
Online Access:http://skhid.kubg.edu.ua/article/view/253628
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849247568069918720
author Roman Dodonov
author_facet Roman Dodonov
author_sort Roman Dodonov
collection DOAJ
description The article is devoted to the study of changes taking place in Ukrainian society in the field of content of historical memory and forms of commemorative practices. The purpose of the study is to identify the main trends in transformations of the form and content of commemorative practices in the Ukrainian historical discourse. During the semi-structured, focused interview with 51 experts representing the main regions of Ukraine, it has been found that current commemorative practices are based on a symbiosis of monologue and dialogue models of memory. The remnants of the Soviet-style totalitarian worldview have led to the popularity of the model of memory, in which the state’s monopoly on history prevails. The idea that national memory consists of many particular commemorations is difficult for Ukrainian society to accept. The past is a kind of symbolic resource, the use of which contributes to the legitimization of Ukraine as an independent state. However, the forms of commemoration remain largely old. Along with fundamentally new forms, primarily related to Internet technologies and social networks, in Ukraine, just as in the Soviet period, commemoration is focused on honoring heroes and victims. At the same time, there is a radical reassessment: the heroes of the Soviet era have become villains, and villains have become heroes. All this points to the “hybrid nature” of commemorative practices with an emphasis on the martyrological-victim component and the trauma of the social psyche of Ukrainians.
format Article
id doaj-art-2c6a012f13f34320b5821769bbd5279e
institution Kabale University
issn 1728-9343
2411-3093
language English
publishDate 2022-04-01
publisher Borys Grinchenko Kyiv Metropolitan University
record_format Article
series Cхід
spelling doaj-art-2c6a012f13f34320b5821769bbd5279e2025-08-20T03:58:10ZengBorys Grinchenko Kyiv Metropolitan UniversityCхід1728-93432411-30932022-04-013110.21847/1728-9343.2022.3(1).253628Transformation of commemorative practices in Ukrainian historical discourseRoman Dodonov0Borys Grinchenko Kyiv University The article is devoted to the study of changes taking place in Ukrainian society in the field of content of historical memory and forms of commemorative practices. The purpose of the study is to identify the main trends in transformations of the form and content of commemorative practices in the Ukrainian historical discourse. During the semi-structured, focused interview with 51 experts representing the main regions of Ukraine, it has been found that current commemorative practices are based on a symbiosis of monologue and dialogue models of memory. The remnants of the Soviet-style totalitarian worldview have led to the popularity of the model of memory, in which the state’s monopoly on history prevails. The idea that national memory consists of many particular commemorations is difficult for Ukrainian society to accept. The past is a kind of symbolic resource, the use of which contributes to the legitimization of Ukraine as an independent state. However, the forms of commemoration remain largely old. Along with fundamentally new forms, primarily related to Internet technologies and social networks, in Ukraine, just as in the Soviet period, commemoration is focused on honoring heroes and victims. At the same time, there is a radical reassessment: the heroes of the Soviet era have become villains, and villains have become heroes. All this points to the “hybrid nature” of commemorative practices with an emphasis on the martyrological-victim component and the trauma of the social psyche of Ukrainians. http://skhid.kubg.edu.ua/article/view/253628social practicescommemorationexpert surveyhistorical memorypolitics of memory
spellingShingle Roman Dodonov
Transformation of commemorative practices in Ukrainian historical discourse
Cхід
social practices
commemoration
expert survey
historical memory
politics of memory
title Transformation of commemorative practices in Ukrainian historical discourse
title_full Transformation of commemorative practices in Ukrainian historical discourse
title_fullStr Transformation of commemorative practices in Ukrainian historical discourse
title_full_unstemmed Transformation of commemorative practices in Ukrainian historical discourse
title_short Transformation of commemorative practices in Ukrainian historical discourse
title_sort transformation of commemorative practices in ukrainian historical discourse
topic social practices
commemoration
expert survey
historical memory
politics of memory
url http://skhid.kubg.edu.ua/article/view/253628
work_keys_str_mv AT romandodonov transformationofcommemorativepracticesinukrainianhistoricaldiscourse