Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial evaluating the benefits from bimodal solution with cochlear implant and hearing aid versus bilateral hearing aids in patients with asymmetric speech identification scores

Introduction Cochlear implant (CI) and hearing aid (HA) in a bimodal solution (CI+HA) is compared with bilateral HAs (HA+HA) to test if the bimodal solution results in better speech intelligibility and self-reported quality of life.Methods and analysis This randomised controlled trial is conducted i...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jesper Hvass Schmidt, Yeliz Jakobsen, Lou-Ann Christensen Andersen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMJ Publishing Group 2022-12-01
Series:BMJ Open
Online Access:https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/12/12/e070296.full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849323966360977408
author Jesper Hvass Schmidt
Yeliz Jakobsen
Lou-Ann Christensen Andersen
author_facet Jesper Hvass Schmidt
Yeliz Jakobsen
Lou-Ann Christensen Andersen
author_sort Jesper Hvass Schmidt
collection DOAJ
description Introduction Cochlear implant (CI) and hearing aid (HA) in a bimodal solution (CI+HA) is compared with bilateral HAs (HA+HA) to test if the bimodal solution results in better speech intelligibility and self-reported quality of life.Methods and analysis This randomised controlled trial is conducted in Odense University Hospital, Denmark. Sixty adult bilateral HA users referred for CI surgery are enrolled if eligible and undergo: audiometry, speech perception in noise (HINT: Hearing in Noise Test), Speech Identification Scores and video head impulse test. All participants will receive new replacement HAs. After 1 month they will be randomly assigned (1:1) to the intervention group (CI+HA) or to the delayed intervention control group (HA+HA). The intervention group (CI+HA) will receive a CI on the ear with a poorer speech recognition score and continue using the HA on the other ear. The control group (HA+HA) will receive a CI after a total of 4 months of bilateral HA use.The primary outcome measures are speech intelligibility measured objectively with HINT (sentences in noise) and DANTALE I (words) and subjectively with the Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing scale questionnaire. Secondary outcomes are patient reported Health-Related Quality of Life scores assessed with the Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire, the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory and Dizziness Handicap Inventory. Third outcome is listening effort assessed with pupil dilation during HINT.In conclusion, the purpose is to improve the clinical decision-making for CI candidacy and optimise bimodal solutions.Ethics and dissemination This study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee Southern Denmark project ID S-20200074G. All participants are required to sign an informed consent form.This study will be published on completion in peer-reviewed publications and scientific conferences.Trial registration number NCT04919928.
format Article
id doaj-art-2c423c95d1bc48e092fb3c9f006b6de3
institution Kabale University
issn 2044-6055
language English
publishDate 2022-12-01
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format Article
series BMJ Open
spelling doaj-art-2c423c95d1bc48e092fb3c9f006b6de32025-08-20T03:48:52ZengBMJ Publishing GroupBMJ Open2044-60552022-12-01121210.1136/bmjopen-2022-070296Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial evaluating the benefits from bimodal solution with cochlear implant and hearing aid versus bilateral hearing aids in patients with asymmetric speech identification scoresJesper Hvass Schmidt0Yeliz Jakobsen1Lou-Ann Christensen Andersen21 Research Unit for ORL – Head & Neck Surgery and Audiology, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, DenmarkDepartment of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Odense University Hospital, Odense C, DenmarkDepartment of Ophthalmology, Vejle Hospital, Vejle, DenmarkIntroduction Cochlear implant (CI) and hearing aid (HA) in a bimodal solution (CI+HA) is compared with bilateral HAs (HA+HA) to test if the bimodal solution results in better speech intelligibility and self-reported quality of life.Methods and analysis This randomised controlled trial is conducted in Odense University Hospital, Denmark. Sixty adult bilateral HA users referred for CI surgery are enrolled if eligible and undergo: audiometry, speech perception in noise (HINT: Hearing in Noise Test), Speech Identification Scores and video head impulse test. All participants will receive new replacement HAs. After 1 month they will be randomly assigned (1:1) to the intervention group (CI+HA) or to the delayed intervention control group (HA+HA). The intervention group (CI+HA) will receive a CI on the ear with a poorer speech recognition score and continue using the HA on the other ear. The control group (HA+HA) will receive a CI after a total of 4 months of bilateral HA use.The primary outcome measures are speech intelligibility measured objectively with HINT (sentences in noise) and DANTALE I (words) and subjectively with the Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing scale questionnaire. Secondary outcomes are patient reported Health-Related Quality of Life scores assessed with the Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire, the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory and Dizziness Handicap Inventory. Third outcome is listening effort assessed with pupil dilation during HINT.In conclusion, the purpose is to improve the clinical decision-making for CI candidacy and optimise bimodal solutions.Ethics and dissemination This study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee Southern Denmark project ID S-20200074G. All participants are required to sign an informed consent form.This study will be published on completion in peer-reviewed publications and scientific conferences.Trial registration number NCT04919928.https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/12/12/e070296.full
spellingShingle Jesper Hvass Schmidt
Yeliz Jakobsen
Lou-Ann Christensen Andersen
Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial evaluating the benefits from bimodal solution with cochlear implant and hearing aid versus bilateral hearing aids in patients with asymmetric speech identification scores
BMJ Open
title Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial evaluating the benefits from bimodal solution with cochlear implant and hearing aid versus bilateral hearing aids in patients with asymmetric speech identification scores
title_full Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial evaluating the benefits from bimodal solution with cochlear implant and hearing aid versus bilateral hearing aids in patients with asymmetric speech identification scores
title_fullStr Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial evaluating the benefits from bimodal solution with cochlear implant and hearing aid versus bilateral hearing aids in patients with asymmetric speech identification scores
title_full_unstemmed Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial evaluating the benefits from bimodal solution with cochlear implant and hearing aid versus bilateral hearing aids in patients with asymmetric speech identification scores
title_short Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial evaluating the benefits from bimodal solution with cochlear implant and hearing aid versus bilateral hearing aids in patients with asymmetric speech identification scores
title_sort study protocol for a randomised controlled trial evaluating the benefits from bimodal solution with cochlear implant and hearing aid versus bilateral hearing aids in patients with asymmetric speech identification scores
url https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/12/12/e070296.full
work_keys_str_mv AT jesperhvassschmidt studyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialevaluatingthebenefitsfrombimodalsolutionwithcochlearimplantandhearingaidversusbilateralhearingaidsinpatientswithasymmetricspeechidentificationscores
AT yelizjakobsen studyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialevaluatingthebenefitsfrombimodalsolutionwithcochlearimplantandhearingaidversusbilateralhearingaidsinpatientswithasymmetricspeechidentificationscores
AT louannchristensenandersen studyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialevaluatingthebenefitsfrombimodalsolutionwithcochlearimplantandhearingaidversusbilateralhearingaidsinpatientswithasymmetricspeechidentificationscores