Recreational trail traffic counts and trail proximity as a driver of ungulate landscape utilization

Abstract With continual growth in recreational trail use, it is becoming increasingly complicated to balance demands for outdoor recreation opportunities with wildlife conservation. To better understand how mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus) and Rocky Mountain elk (Cervus canadensis) respond to trail‐b...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chloe Beaupre, Alissa Bevan, Jessica R. Young, Kevin A. Blecha
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2025-06-01
Series:Ecosphere
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.70305
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850121296364437504
author Chloe Beaupre
Alissa Bevan
Jessica R. Young
Kevin A. Blecha
author_facet Chloe Beaupre
Alissa Bevan
Jessica R. Young
Kevin A. Blecha
author_sort Chloe Beaupre
collection DOAJ
description Abstract With continual growth in recreational trail use, it is becoming increasingly complicated to balance demands for outdoor recreation opportunities with wildlife conservation. To better understand how mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus) and Rocky Mountain elk (Cervus canadensis) respond to trail‐based recreation, we deployed remote cameras in a paired study design to assess ungulate encounter rates relative to recreation traffic counts and distance from trails. Our methodology allowed us to estimate the magnitude of human activity on public land trails, which can be challenging, but is a key step in understanding recreational effects on animal utilization, especially if any interaction in trail proximity and human traffic rates exists. Paired cameras provided a comparison of animal encounter rates on‐ and off‐trail at varying trail proximities, and the on‐trail camera also yielded daily recreation traffic counts to assess how animals respond to varying traffic for each camera pair. Elk avoided busier trails and showed a strong positive response to distance from trails, while mule deer exhibited a positive response to higher traffic counts and no measurable effect of trail proximity. We identified a distance to trail threshold of 600–655 m, where elk utilization shifted from lower‐than‐expected utilization to higher‐than‐expected utilization, indicating that this elk population was redistributed to some degree within 57.5% of the study area's extent. Quantifying recreation traffic counts was key to understanding species' responses to recreation, highlighting the need for managers to consider both trail placement and human traffic regulation to mitigate recreation impacts.
format Article
id doaj-art-2c3c34fb01594a7a8c6b500addde45fa
institution OA Journals
issn 2150-8925
language English
publishDate 2025-06-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Ecosphere
spelling doaj-art-2c3c34fb01594a7a8c6b500addde45fa2025-08-20T02:35:07ZengWileyEcosphere2150-89252025-06-01166n/an/a10.1002/ecs2.70305Recreational trail traffic counts and trail proximity as a driver of ungulate landscape utilizationChloe Beaupre0Alissa Bevan1Jessica R. Young2Kevin A. Blecha3Clark School of Environment and Sustainability Western Colorado University Gunnison Colorado USAClark School of Environment and Sustainability Western Colorado University Gunnison Colorado USAClark School of Environment and Sustainability Western Colorado University Gunnison Colorado USAColorado Parks and Wildlife Gunnison Colorado USAAbstract With continual growth in recreational trail use, it is becoming increasingly complicated to balance demands for outdoor recreation opportunities with wildlife conservation. To better understand how mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus) and Rocky Mountain elk (Cervus canadensis) respond to trail‐based recreation, we deployed remote cameras in a paired study design to assess ungulate encounter rates relative to recreation traffic counts and distance from trails. Our methodology allowed us to estimate the magnitude of human activity on public land trails, which can be challenging, but is a key step in understanding recreational effects on animal utilization, especially if any interaction in trail proximity and human traffic rates exists. Paired cameras provided a comparison of animal encounter rates on‐ and off‐trail at varying trail proximities, and the on‐trail camera also yielded daily recreation traffic counts to assess how animals respond to varying traffic for each camera pair. Elk avoided busier trails and showed a strong positive response to distance from trails, while mule deer exhibited a positive response to higher traffic counts and no measurable effect of trail proximity. We identified a distance to trail threshold of 600–655 m, where elk utilization shifted from lower‐than‐expected utilization to higher‐than‐expected utilization, indicating that this elk population was redistributed to some degree within 57.5% of the study area's extent. Quantifying recreation traffic counts was key to understanding species' responses to recreation, highlighting the need for managers to consider both trail placement and human traffic regulation to mitigate recreation impacts.https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.70305camera trapelkhuman activityhuman wildlife interactionmule deerrecreation
spellingShingle Chloe Beaupre
Alissa Bevan
Jessica R. Young
Kevin A. Blecha
Recreational trail traffic counts and trail proximity as a driver of ungulate landscape utilization
Ecosphere
camera trap
elk
human activity
human wildlife interaction
mule deer
recreation
title Recreational trail traffic counts and trail proximity as a driver of ungulate landscape utilization
title_full Recreational trail traffic counts and trail proximity as a driver of ungulate landscape utilization
title_fullStr Recreational trail traffic counts and trail proximity as a driver of ungulate landscape utilization
title_full_unstemmed Recreational trail traffic counts and trail proximity as a driver of ungulate landscape utilization
title_short Recreational trail traffic counts and trail proximity as a driver of ungulate landscape utilization
title_sort recreational trail traffic counts and trail proximity as a driver of ungulate landscape utilization
topic camera trap
elk
human activity
human wildlife interaction
mule deer
recreation
url https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.70305
work_keys_str_mv AT chloebeaupre recreationaltrailtrafficcountsandtrailproximityasadriverofungulatelandscapeutilization
AT alissabevan recreationaltrailtrafficcountsandtrailproximityasadriverofungulatelandscapeutilization
AT jessicaryoung recreationaltrailtrafficcountsandtrailproximityasadriverofungulatelandscapeutilization
AT kevinablecha recreationaltrailtrafficcountsandtrailproximityasadriverofungulatelandscapeutilization