Exploring the community of inquiry framework in higher education: a bibliometric analysis
This article presents a bibliometric analysis of the Community of Inquiry (CoI) framework in Higher Education (HE) for the period 1990–2024. Using the PRISMA framework for systematic data retrieval, 280 articles from the Lens database were analysed to map research trends and key themes. Core metrics...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Taylor & Francis Group
2025-12-01
|
| Series: | Cogent Education |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2460224 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1832577376539639808 |
|---|---|
| author | Aarti Pushp Rawal |
| author_facet | Aarti Pushp Rawal |
| author_sort | Aarti Pushp Rawal |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | This article presents a bibliometric analysis of the Community of Inquiry (CoI) framework in Higher Education (HE) for the period 1990–2024. Using the PRISMA framework for systematic data retrieval, 280 articles from the Lens database were analysed to map research trends and key themes. Core metrics, including publication frequency, countries, authors, journals, and recurring keywords, were assessed to reveal the evolution of CoI research in HE. The findings revealed a surge in publications in 2022, with the United Kingdom leading in contributions (n = 100), highlighting the framework’s global impact. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning (IRRODL) emerged as a core source , while Purdue University ranked as a key contributor. Citation analysis revealed Garrison’s (1999) work, Critical Inquiry in a Text-Based Environment: Computer Conferencing in Higher Education, as a seminal publication, with 10,927 citations, establishing D.R. Garrison as a key figure in CoI discourse. Beyond quantitative metrics, this analysis offers insights into the theoretical evolution and practical relevance of CoI in pedagogy, technological integration, and curriculum in HE. It also proposes directions for future research to deepen the understanding of CoI’s pedagogical relevance and impact in diverse educational contexts. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-2c2ef81ff65d47f497dc742b4dff94f8 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2331-186X |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-12-01 |
| publisher | Taylor & Francis Group |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Cogent Education |
| spelling | doaj-art-2c2ef81ff65d47f497dc742b4dff94f82025-01-30T21:28:32ZengTaylor & Francis GroupCogent Education2331-186X2025-12-0112110.1080/2331186X.2025.2460224Exploring the community of inquiry framework in higher education: a bibliometric analysisAarti Pushp Rawal0Postgraduate Dept., FOELPM, SEGi University, Jalan Teknologi, Kota Damansara, Selangor, Petaling Jaya, MalaysiaThis article presents a bibliometric analysis of the Community of Inquiry (CoI) framework in Higher Education (HE) for the period 1990–2024. Using the PRISMA framework for systematic data retrieval, 280 articles from the Lens database were analysed to map research trends and key themes. Core metrics, including publication frequency, countries, authors, journals, and recurring keywords, were assessed to reveal the evolution of CoI research in HE. The findings revealed a surge in publications in 2022, with the United Kingdom leading in contributions (n = 100), highlighting the framework’s global impact. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning (IRRODL) emerged as a core source , while Purdue University ranked as a key contributor. Citation analysis revealed Garrison’s (1999) work, Critical Inquiry in a Text-Based Environment: Computer Conferencing in Higher Education, as a seminal publication, with 10,927 citations, establishing D.R. Garrison as a key figure in CoI discourse. Beyond quantitative metrics, this analysis offers insights into the theoretical evolution and practical relevance of CoI in pedagogy, technological integration, and curriculum in HE. It also proposes directions for future research to deepen the understanding of CoI’s pedagogical relevance and impact in diverse educational contexts.https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2460224Community of inquiryhigher educationbibliometric analysiscitation metricseducational researchTheories of Learning |
| spellingShingle | Aarti Pushp Rawal Exploring the community of inquiry framework in higher education: a bibliometric analysis Cogent Education Community of inquiry higher education bibliometric analysis citation metrics educational research Theories of Learning |
| title | Exploring the community of inquiry framework in higher education: a bibliometric analysis |
| title_full | Exploring the community of inquiry framework in higher education: a bibliometric analysis |
| title_fullStr | Exploring the community of inquiry framework in higher education: a bibliometric analysis |
| title_full_unstemmed | Exploring the community of inquiry framework in higher education: a bibliometric analysis |
| title_short | Exploring the community of inquiry framework in higher education: a bibliometric analysis |
| title_sort | exploring the community of inquiry framework in higher education a bibliometric analysis |
| topic | Community of inquiry higher education bibliometric analysis citation metrics educational research Theories of Learning |
| url | https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2460224 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT aartipushprawal exploringthecommunityofinquiryframeworkinhighereducationabibliometricanalysis |