The impact of visual fidelity on screen-based virtual reality food choices: A randomized pilot study.
<h4>Objective</h4>To understand the impact of fidelity and perceived realism on virtual reality food choices, and task motivation, engagement, and interest.<h4>Design</h4>Randomized controlled trial.<h4>Setting</h4>Online.<h4>Participants</h4>84 partic...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2025-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0312772 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1825206775912071168 |
---|---|
author | Bianca Curi Braga Pejman Sajjadi Mahda Bagher Alexander Klippel Jessica Menold Travis Masterson |
author_facet | Bianca Curi Braga Pejman Sajjadi Mahda Bagher Alexander Klippel Jessica Menold Travis Masterson |
author_sort | Bianca Curi Braga |
collection | DOAJ |
description | <h4>Objective</h4>To understand the impact of fidelity and perceived realism on virtual reality food choices, and task motivation, engagement, and interest.<h4>Design</h4>Randomized controlled trial.<h4>Setting</h4>Online.<h4>Participants</h4>84 participants recruited from Amazon Mechanical Turk.<h4>Intervention</h4>Participants were randomly assigned to either a high- (n = 43) or a low- (n = 41) visual fidelity environment and were asked to select foods to have a meal with a friend.<h4>Main outcome measures</h4>Food choice, motivation of food choices, engagement, and interest.<h4>Analysis</h4>Simple linear regressions between visual fidelity and perceived realism, and log-linear regressions for visual fidelity or perceived realism on either motivation, interest, or engagement. Poisson models between visual fidelity or perceived realism, and food selections.<h4>Results</h4>Manipulating visual fidelity was not associated with perceived realism, motivation, interest, or engagement in the food selection task. Perceived realism increased motivation by 0.3% (SE 0.056; p = 0.022), interest by 1.4% (SE 0.002; p<0.001), and engagement by 0.9% (SE 0.001; p<0.001) in the food selection task. High visual fidelity decreased the total number of foods selected (B = 0.216; CI (-0.384; -0.047); p = 0.012).<h4>Conclusion and implications</h4>Perceived realism, but not visual fidelity, is important for task related factors like motivation, engagement, and interest. Visual fidelity may influence some food selections. |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-2c29fd52110f40338037d917848e215e |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 1932-6203 |
language | English |
publishDate | 2025-01-01 |
publisher | Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
record_format | Article |
series | PLoS ONE |
spelling | doaj-art-2c29fd52110f40338037d917848e215e2025-02-07T05:30:44ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032025-01-01201e031277210.1371/journal.pone.0312772The impact of visual fidelity on screen-based virtual reality food choices: A randomized pilot study.Bianca Curi BragaPejman SajjadiMahda BagherAlexander KlippelJessica MenoldTravis Masterson<h4>Objective</h4>To understand the impact of fidelity and perceived realism on virtual reality food choices, and task motivation, engagement, and interest.<h4>Design</h4>Randomized controlled trial.<h4>Setting</h4>Online.<h4>Participants</h4>84 participants recruited from Amazon Mechanical Turk.<h4>Intervention</h4>Participants were randomly assigned to either a high- (n = 43) or a low- (n = 41) visual fidelity environment and were asked to select foods to have a meal with a friend.<h4>Main outcome measures</h4>Food choice, motivation of food choices, engagement, and interest.<h4>Analysis</h4>Simple linear regressions between visual fidelity and perceived realism, and log-linear regressions for visual fidelity or perceived realism on either motivation, interest, or engagement. Poisson models between visual fidelity or perceived realism, and food selections.<h4>Results</h4>Manipulating visual fidelity was not associated with perceived realism, motivation, interest, or engagement in the food selection task. Perceived realism increased motivation by 0.3% (SE 0.056; p = 0.022), interest by 1.4% (SE 0.002; p<0.001), and engagement by 0.9% (SE 0.001; p<0.001) in the food selection task. High visual fidelity decreased the total number of foods selected (B = 0.216; CI (-0.384; -0.047); p = 0.012).<h4>Conclusion and implications</h4>Perceived realism, but not visual fidelity, is important for task related factors like motivation, engagement, and interest. Visual fidelity may influence some food selections.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0312772 |
spellingShingle | Bianca Curi Braga Pejman Sajjadi Mahda Bagher Alexander Klippel Jessica Menold Travis Masterson The impact of visual fidelity on screen-based virtual reality food choices: A randomized pilot study. PLoS ONE |
title | The impact of visual fidelity on screen-based virtual reality food choices: A randomized pilot study. |
title_full | The impact of visual fidelity on screen-based virtual reality food choices: A randomized pilot study. |
title_fullStr | The impact of visual fidelity on screen-based virtual reality food choices: A randomized pilot study. |
title_full_unstemmed | The impact of visual fidelity on screen-based virtual reality food choices: A randomized pilot study. |
title_short | The impact of visual fidelity on screen-based virtual reality food choices: A randomized pilot study. |
title_sort | impact of visual fidelity on screen based virtual reality food choices a randomized pilot study |
url | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0312772 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT biancacuribraga theimpactofvisualfidelityonscreenbasedvirtualrealityfoodchoicesarandomizedpilotstudy AT pejmansajjadi theimpactofvisualfidelityonscreenbasedvirtualrealityfoodchoicesarandomizedpilotstudy AT mahdabagher theimpactofvisualfidelityonscreenbasedvirtualrealityfoodchoicesarandomizedpilotstudy AT alexanderklippel theimpactofvisualfidelityonscreenbasedvirtualrealityfoodchoicesarandomizedpilotstudy AT jessicamenold theimpactofvisualfidelityonscreenbasedvirtualrealityfoodchoicesarandomizedpilotstudy AT travismasterson theimpactofvisualfidelityonscreenbasedvirtualrealityfoodchoicesarandomizedpilotstudy AT biancacuribraga impactofvisualfidelityonscreenbasedvirtualrealityfoodchoicesarandomizedpilotstudy AT pejmansajjadi impactofvisualfidelityonscreenbasedvirtualrealityfoodchoicesarandomizedpilotstudy AT mahdabagher impactofvisualfidelityonscreenbasedvirtualrealityfoodchoicesarandomizedpilotstudy AT alexanderklippel impactofvisualfidelityonscreenbasedvirtualrealityfoodchoicesarandomizedpilotstudy AT jessicamenold impactofvisualfidelityonscreenbasedvirtualrealityfoodchoicesarandomizedpilotstudy AT travismasterson impactofvisualfidelityonscreenbasedvirtualrealityfoodchoicesarandomizedpilotstudy |