Du déroutage de l’évaluation
Work assessment has become a ubiquitous practice in the workplace. Yet what is designated as such raises questions. Evaluation as applied to work not only demonstrates certain limits, but above all problematic developments in its use and aims. From the plurality and complexity of what was originally...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | fra |
| Published: |
Université de Provence
2023-12-01
|
| Series: | Questions Vives |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://journals.openedition.org/questionsvives/8505 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | Work assessment has become a ubiquitous practice in the workplace. Yet what is designated as such raises questions. Evaluation as applied to work not only demonstrates certain limits, but above all problematic developments in its use and aims. From the plurality and complexity of what was originally covered by the evaluative approach, all that remains is a standardized tool that no longer focuses on actions including qualitative aspects, but on individuals and measurability indices. As a result of these changes, it has to be said that evaluation, rather than (in)training, is increasingly distorting the relationship to professionalism of those involved, by obscuring what constitutes their core business. This internal deprofessionalization is also supported by another process at work in managerial discourse, namely the naturalization of skills. When skills become innate, it seems difficult to to have one’s professional quality recognised. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1635-4079 1775-433X |