A thematic analysis of South African opinions about COVID-19 vaccination on Twitter
Vaccine hesitancy is a public health concern in South Africa and internationally. Literature on vaccine hesitancy associates this with mistrust of the government. We present a qualitative analysis of opinions about COVID-19 vaccination expressed by South African Twitter (now X) users during the fir...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Academy of Science of South Africa
2024-12-01
|
| Series: | South African Journal of Science |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://sajs.co.za/article/view/17423 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850167941908135936 |
|---|---|
| author | Philippa Kerr Kevin Durrheim Maria Schuld Davide Morselli |
| author_facet | Philippa Kerr Kevin Durrheim Maria Schuld Davide Morselli |
| author_sort | Philippa Kerr |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description |
Vaccine hesitancy is a public health concern in South Africa and internationally. Literature on vaccine hesitancy associates this with mistrust of the government. We present a qualitative analysis of opinions about COVID-19 vaccination expressed by South African Twitter (now X) users during the first year of the vaccine rollout in South Africa. We conducted a thematic analysis of 800 randomly selected tweets containing vaccine-related keywords, sampled from four time periods in 2021. We categorised comprehensible South African non-news tweets as pro-vaccination (24.75% of sample), anti-vaccination (20.25%) or ambivalent (4.5%), and then identified themes. Among pro-vaccination tweets, the most common themes were criticism of the government’s handling of vaccine procurement and the rollout; concerns that the vaccine was urgently needed and/or not being made available fast enough; and statements that vaccines were safe and/or effective against COVID-19. Among anti-vaccination tweets, the most common themes were claims that the vaccine was harmful or too risky; suspicion of the government’s intentions with respect to the vaccine it was offering the public; and opposition to mandatory or ‘forced’ vaccination. Criticism and mistrust of the government were present among both pro- and anti-vaccination tweets, though for different reasons. We discuss this in light of literature recommending trust-building as a response to vaccine hesitancy.
Significance:
Numerous studies recognise mistrust in the government as a correlate of anti-vaccination opinions, but our findings suggest that holders of both pro- and anti-vaccination opinions in South Africa mistrust the government – albeit for different reasons. Several South African authors propose ‘trust-building’ as a solution to vaccine hesitancy and refusal, but we suggest that in a context of government corruption, it is not more trust that the South African public needs, but more critical literacy in order to discern when the government is and is not acting in the public (health) interest.
|
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-2b7e2faf6c77497ba1adc2b9d10e6a95 |
| institution | OA Journals |
| issn | 1996-7489 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2024-12-01 |
| publisher | Academy of Science of South Africa |
| record_format | Article |
| series | South African Journal of Science |
| spelling | doaj-art-2b7e2faf6c77497ba1adc2b9d10e6a952025-08-20T02:21:06ZengAcademy of Science of South AfricaSouth African Journal of Science1996-74892024-12-0112011/1210.17159/sajs.2024/17423A thematic analysis of South African opinions about COVID-19 vaccination on TwitterPhilippa Kerr0https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4257-6078Kevin Durrheim1https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2926-5953Maria Schuld2https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8626-168XDavide Morselli3https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1490-9691Department of Psychology, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South AfricaDepartment of Psychology, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South AfricaDepartment of Psychology, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South AfricaSwiss Centre of Expertise in Life Course Research (LIVES), University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland Vaccine hesitancy is a public health concern in South Africa and internationally. Literature on vaccine hesitancy associates this with mistrust of the government. We present a qualitative analysis of opinions about COVID-19 vaccination expressed by South African Twitter (now X) users during the first year of the vaccine rollout in South Africa. We conducted a thematic analysis of 800 randomly selected tweets containing vaccine-related keywords, sampled from four time periods in 2021. We categorised comprehensible South African non-news tweets as pro-vaccination (24.75% of sample), anti-vaccination (20.25%) or ambivalent (4.5%), and then identified themes. Among pro-vaccination tweets, the most common themes were criticism of the government’s handling of vaccine procurement and the rollout; concerns that the vaccine was urgently needed and/or not being made available fast enough; and statements that vaccines were safe and/or effective against COVID-19. Among anti-vaccination tweets, the most common themes were claims that the vaccine was harmful or too risky; suspicion of the government’s intentions with respect to the vaccine it was offering the public; and opposition to mandatory or ‘forced’ vaccination. Criticism and mistrust of the government were present among both pro- and anti-vaccination tweets, though for different reasons. We discuss this in light of literature recommending trust-building as a response to vaccine hesitancy. Significance: Numerous studies recognise mistrust in the government as a correlate of anti-vaccination opinions, but our findings suggest that holders of both pro- and anti-vaccination opinions in South Africa mistrust the government – albeit for different reasons. Several South African authors propose ‘trust-building’ as a solution to vaccine hesitancy and refusal, but we suggest that in a context of government corruption, it is not more trust that the South African public needs, but more critical literacy in order to discern when the government is and is not acting in the public (health) interest. https://sajs.co.za/article/view/17423COVID-19vaccinationTwitterpro-vaccinationanti-vaccination |
| spellingShingle | Philippa Kerr Kevin Durrheim Maria Schuld Davide Morselli A thematic analysis of South African opinions about COVID-19 vaccination on Twitter South African Journal of Science COVID-19 vaccination pro-vaccination anti-vaccination |
| title | A thematic analysis of South African opinions about COVID-19 vaccination on Twitter |
| title_full | A thematic analysis of South African opinions about COVID-19 vaccination on Twitter |
| title_fullStr | A thematic analysis of South African opinions about COVID-19 vaccination on Twitter |
| title_full_unstemmed | A thematic analysis of South African opinions about COVID-19 vaccination on Twitter |
| title_short | A thematic analysis of South African opinions about COVID-19 vaccination on Twitter |
| title_sort | thematic analysis of south african opinions about covid 19 vaccination on twitter |
| topic | COVID-19 vaccination pro-vaccination anti-vaccination |
| url | https://sajs.co.za/article/view/17423 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT philippakerr athematicanalysisofsouthafricanopinionsaboutcovid19vaccinationontwitter AT kevindurrheim athematicanalysisofsouthafricanopinionsaboutcovid19vaccinationontwitter AT mariaschuld athematicanalysisofsouthafricanopinionsaboutcovid19vaccinationontwitter AT davidemorselli athematicanalysisofsouthafricanopinionsaboutcovid19vaccinationontwitter AT philippakerr thematicanalysisofsouthafricanopinionsaboutcovid19vaccinationontwitter AT kevindurrheim thematicanalysisofsouthafricanopinionsaboutcovid19vaccinationontwitter AT mariaschuld thematicanalysisofsouthafricanopinionsaboutcovid19vaccinationontwitter AT davidemorselli thematicanalysisofsouthafricanopinionsaboutcovid19vaccinationontwitter |