Grading of Age-Related Macular Degeneration: Comparison between Color Fundus Photography, Fluorescein Angiography, and Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography

Purpose. To compare color fundus photography (FP), fluorescein angiography (FA), and spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SDOCT) for the detection of age-related macular degeneration (AMD), choroidal neovascularisation (CNV), and CNV activity. Methods. FPs, FAs, and SDOCT volume scans from...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nils F. Mokwa, Tina Ristau, Pearse A. Keane, Bernd Kirchhof, Srinivas R. Sadda, Sandra Liakopoulos
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2013-01-01
Series:Journal of Ophthalmology
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/385915
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850228573206478848
author Nils F. Mokwa
Tina Ristau
Pearse A. Keane
Bernd Kirchhof
Srinivas R. Sadda
Sandra Liakopoulos
author_facet Nils F. Mokwa
Tina Ristau
Pearse A. Keane
Bernd Kirchhof
Srinivas R. Sadda
Sandra Liakopoulos
author_sort Nils F. Mokwa
collection DOAJ
description Purpose. To compare color fundus photography (FP), fluorescein angiography (FA), and spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SDOCT) for the detection of age-related macular degeneration (AMD), choroidal neovascularisation (CNV), and CNV activity. Methods. FPs, FAs, and SDOCT volume scans from 120 eyes of 66 AMD and control patients were randomly collected. Control eyes were required to show no AMD, but other retinal pathology was allowed. The presence of drusen, pigmentary changes, CNV, and signs for CNV activity was independently analyzed for all imaging modalities. Results. AMD was diagnosed based on FP in 75 eyes. SDOCT and FA showed sensitivity (specificity) of 89% (76%) and 92% (82%), respectively. CNV was present on FA in 68 eyes. Sensitivity (specificity) was 78% (100%) for FP and 94% (98%) for SDOCT. CNV activity was detected by SDOCT or FA in 60 eyes with an agreement in 46 eyes. Sensitivity was 88% for SDOCT and 88% for FA. FP showed sensitivity of 38% and specificity of 98%. Conclusions. CNV lesions and activity may be missed by FP alone, but FP may help identifying drusen and pigmentary changes. SDOCT is highly sensitive for the detection of AMD, CNV, and CNV activity; however, it cannot fully replace FA.
format Article
id doaj-art-2b65fd35a9624b349d1dc788a1e746fa
institution OA Journals
issn 2090-004X
2090-0058
language English
publishDate 2013-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Journal of Ophthalmology
spelling doaj-art-2b65fd35a9624b349d1dc788a1e746fa2025-08-20T02:04:30ZengWileyJournal of Ophthalmology2090-004X2090-00582013-01-01201310.1155/2013/385915385915Grading of Age-Related Macular Degeneration: Comparison between Color Fundus Photography, Fluorescein Angiography, and Spectral Domain Optical Coherence TomographyNils F. Mokwa0Tina Ristau1Pearse A. Keane2Bernd Kirchhof3Srinivas R. Sadda4Sandra Liakopoulos5Cologne Image Reading Center and Laboratory, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Cologne, 50924 Cologne, GermanyCologne Image Reading Center and Laboratory, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Cologne, 50924 Cologne, GermanyBiomedical Research Centre for Ophthalmology, Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, London EC1V 2PD, UKCologne Image Reading Center and Laboratory, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Cologne, 50924 Cologne, GermanyDoheny Image Reading Center, Doheny Eye Institute, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USACologne Image Reading Center and Laboratory, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Cologne, 50924 Cologne, GermanyPurpose. To compare color fundus photography (FP), fluorescein angiography (FA), and spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SDOCT) for the detection of age-related macular degeneration (AMD), choroidal neovascularisation (CNV), and CNV activity. Methods. FPs, FAs, and SDOCT volume scans from 120 eyes of 66 AMD and control patients were randomly collected. Control eyes were required to show no AMD, but other retinal pathology was allowed. The presence of drusen, pigmentary changes, CNV, and signs for CNV activity was independently analyzed for all imaging modalities. Results. AMD was diagnosed based on FP in 75 eyes. SDOCT and FA showed sensitivity (specificity) of 89% (76%) and 92% (82%), respectively. CNV was present on FA in 68 eyes. Sensitivity (specificity) was 78% (100%) for FP and 94% (98%) for SDOCT. CNV activity was detected by SDOCT or FA in 60 eyes with an agreement in 46 eyes. Sensitivity was 88% for SDOCT and 88% for FA. FP showed sensitivity of 38% and specificity of 98%. Conclusions. CNV lesions and activity may be missed by FP alone, but FP may help identifying drusen and pigmentary changes. SDOCT is highly sensitive for the detection of AMD, CNV, and CNV activity; however, it cannot fully replace FA.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/385915
spellingShingle Nils F. Mokwa
Tina Ristau
Pearse A. Keane
Bernd Kirchhof
Srinivas R. Sadda
Sandra Liakopoulos
Grading of Age-Related Macular Degeneration: Comparison between Color Fundus Photography, Fluorescein Angiography, and Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography
Journal of Ophthalmology
title Grading of Age-Related Macular Degeneration: Comparison between Color Fundus Photography, Fluorescein Angiography, and Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography
title_full Grading of Age-Related Macular Degeneration: Comparison between Color Fundus Photography, Fluorescein Angiography, and Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography
title_fullStr Grading of Age-Related Macular Degeneration: Comparison between Color Fundus Photography, Fluorescein Angiography, and Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography
title_full_unstemmed Grading of Age-Related Macular Degeneration: Comparison between Color Fundus Photography, Fluorescein Angiography, and Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography
title_short Grading of Age-Related Macular Degeneration: Comparison between Color Fundus Photography, Fluorescein Angiography, and Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography
title_sort grading of age related macular degeneration comparison between color fundus photography fluorescein angiography and spectral domain optical coherence tomography
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/385915
work_keys_str_mv AT nilsfmokwa gradingofagerelatedmaculardegenerationcomparisonbetweencolorfundusphotographyfluoresceinangiographyandspectraldomainopticalcoherencetomography
AT tinaristau gradingofagerelatedmaculardegenerationcomparisonbetweencolorfundusphotographyfluoresceinangiographyandspectraldomainopticalcoherencetomography
AT pearseakeane gradingofagerelatedmaculardegenerationcomparisonbetweencolorfundusphotographyfluoresceinangiographyandspectraldomainopticalcoherencetomography
AT berndkirchhof gradingofagerelatedmaculardegenerationcomparisonbetweencolorfundusphotographyfluoresceinangiographyandspectraldomainopticalcoherencetomography
AT srinivasrsadda gradingofagerelatedmaculardegenerationcomparisonbetweencolorfundusphotographyfluoresceinangiographyandspectraldomainopticalcoherencetomography
AT sandraliakopoulos gradingofagerelatedmaculardegenerationcomparisonbetweencolorfundusphotographyfluoresceinangiographyandspectraldomainopticalcoherencetomography