Hard to Swallow: Scaling Relationships Between the Size of Avian Prey and the Overall Size and Maximal Gape of Brown Treesnakes

ABSTRACT Snakes are a useful model for gaining insights into the relationships between predator and prey sizes and resource utilization because their anatomy limits the size of prey that can be swallowed whole. However, data are sparse regarding how commonly gape‐limited predators eat or attempt to...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shane R. Siers, Juan‐Carlos Mungaray, Martin Kastner, Bruce C. Jayne
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2025-04-01
Series:Ecology and Evolution
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.71338
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849419257948930048
author Shane R. Siers
Juan‐Carlos Mungaray
Martin Kastner
Bruce C. Jayne
author_facet Shane R. Siers
Juan‐Carlos Mungaray
Martin Kastner
Bruce C. Jayne
author_sort Shane R. Siers
collection DOAJ
description ABSTRACT Snakes are a useful model for gaining insights into the relationships between predator and prey sizes and resource utilization because their anatomy limits the size of prey that can be swallowed whole. However, data are sparse regarding how commonly gape‐limited predators eat or attempt to eat prey with sizes up to or exceeding their maximal gape. Thus, for an invasive predator, the brown treesnake (Boiga irregularis), we fed captive snakes dead birds with an extremely large range (17%–447%) of relative prey area (RPA = prey cross‐sectional area/snake gape area) to test the predictive value of RPA for snakes attempting to ingest or successfully ingesting prey. As expected, RPA significantly predicted (logistic regression p < 0.0001) the probability of birds being eaten, with an upper size limit similar to the maximal gape of the snakes. Although RPA also significantly predicted (p = 0.003) the probability of attempting to eat a bird, it was less accurate in predicting attempts than successes, and many snakes attempted to eat birds too large to swallow. Twenty‐five snakes attempted to eat birds with RPA ranging from 130% to 447%. The longest durations of unsuccessful feeding attempts were often for values of RPA near 100% rather than the extremely large values. For six large birds with mean measured RPA = 93%, the prey diameter soon after ingestion averaged 14% less than that measured prior to ingestion, which can allow snakes to consume 30% more mass than would otherwise be possible. Our findings complement a recent field study that concluded brown treesnakes regularly attempt to eat live birds too large to swallow. Our results also greatly expanded the known range of avian prey sizes that these snakes attempt to eat. Consequently, brown treesnakes pose a risk to birds with sizes well beyond the limit on prey size imposed by gape.
format Article
id doaj-art-2b49f886c267449ca3b0e38e40cd2205
institution Kabale University
issn 2045-7758
language English
publishDate 2025-04-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Ecology and Evolution
spelling doaj-art-2b49f886c267449ca3b0e38e40cd22052025-08-20T03:32:11ZengWileyEcology and Evolution2045-77582025-04-01154n/an/a10.1002/ece3.71338Hard to Swallow: Scaling Relationships Between the Size of Avian Prey and the Overall Size and Maximal Gape of Brown TreesnakesShane R. Siers0Juan‐Carlos Mungaray1Martin Kastner2Bruce C. Jayne3United States Department of Agriculture, Wildlife Services National Wildlife Research Center Barrigada GuamResearch Corporation of the University of Guam University of Guam Mangilao GuamDepartment of Fish and Wildlife Conservation Virginia Tech Blacksburg Virginia USADepartment of Biological Sciences University of Cincinnati Cincinnati Ohio USAABSTRACT Snakes are a useful model for gaining insights into the relationships between predator and prey sizes and resource utilization because their anatomy limits the size of prey that can be swallowed whole. However, data are sparse regarding how commonly gape‐limited predators eat or attempt to eat prey with sizes up to or exceeding their maximal gape. Thus, for an invasive predator, the brown treesnake (Boiga irregularis), we fed captive snakes dead birds with an extremely large range (17%–447%) of relative prey area (RPA = prey cross‐sectional area/snake gape area) to test the predictive value of RPA for snakes attempting to ingest or successfully ingesting prey. As expected, RPA significantly predicted (logistic regression p < 0.0001) the probability of birds being eaten, with an upper size limit similar to the maximal gape of the snakes. Although RPA also significantly predicted (p = 0.003) the probability of attempting to eat a bird, it was less accurate in predicting attempts than successes, and many snakes attempted to eat birds too large to swallow. Twenty‐five snakes attempted to eat birds with RPA ranging from 130% to 447%. The longest durations of unsuccessful feeding attempts were often for values of RPA near 100% rather than the extremely large values. For six large birds with mean measured RPA = 93%, the prey diameter soon after ingestion averaged 14% less than that measured prior to ingestion, which can allow snakes to consume 30% more mass than would otherwise be possible. Our findings complement a recent field study that concluded brown treesnakes regularly attempt to eat live birds too large to swallow. Our results also greatly expanded the known range of avian prey sizes that these snakes attempt to eat. Consequently, brown treesnakes pose a risk to birds with sizes well beyond the limit on prey size imposed by gape.https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.71338allometrybehaviorbirdfeeding ecologypredationsnake
spellingShingle Shane R. Siers
Juan‐Carlos Mungaray
Martin Kastner
Bruce C. Jayne
Hard to Swallow: Scaling Relationships Between the Size of Avian Prey and the Overall Size and Maximal Gape of Brown Treesnakes
Ecology and Evolution
allometry
behavior
bird
feeding ecology
predation
snake
title Hard to Swallow: Scaling Relationships Between the Size of Avian Prey and the Overall Size and Maximal Gape of Brown Treesnakes
title_full Hard to Swallow: Scaling Relationships Between the Size of Avian Prey and the Overall Size and Maximal Gape of Brown Treesnakes
title_fullStr Hard to Swallow: Scaling Relationships Between the Size of Avian Prey and the Overall Size and Maximal Gape of Brown Treesnakes
title_full_unstemmed Hard to Swallow: Scaling Relationships Between the Size of Avian Prey and the Overall Size and Maximal Gape of Brown Treesnakes
title_short Hard to Swallow: Scaling Relationships Between the Size of Avian Prey and the Overall Size and Maximal Gape of Brown Treesnakes
title_sort hard to swallow scaling relationships between the size of avian prey and the overall size and maximal gape of brown treesnakes
topic allometry
behavior
bird
feeding ecology
predation
snake
url https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.71338
work_keys_str_mv AT shanersiers hardtoswallowscalingrelationshipsbetweenthesizeofavianpreyandtheoverallsizeandmaximalgapeofbrowntreesnakes
AT juancarlosmungaray hardtoswallowscalingrelationshipsbetweenthesizeofavianpreyandtheoverallsizeandmaximalgapeofbrowntreesnakes
AT martinkastner hardtoswallowscalingrelationshipsbetweenthesizeofavianpreyandtheoverallsizeandmaximalgapeofbrowntreesnakes
AT brucecjayne hardtoswallowscalingrelationshipsbetweenthesizeofavianpreyandtheoverallsizeandmaximalgapeofbrowntreesnakes