Impact Angle Control of Local Intense dB/dt Variations During Shock‐Induced Substorms

Abstract The impact of interplanetary shocks on the magnetosphere can trigger magnetic substorms that intensify auroral electrojet currents. These currents enhance ground magnetic field perturbations (dB/dt), which in turn generate geomagnetically induced currents (GICs) that can be detrimental to p...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Denny M. Oliveira, James M. Weygand, Eftyhia Zesta, Chigomezyo M. Ngwira, Michael D. Hartinger, Zhonghua Xu, Barbara L. Giles, Daniel J. Gershman, Marcos V. D. Silveira, Vítor M. Souza
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2021-12-01
Series:Space Weather
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1029/2021SW002933
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841536391418216448
author Denny M. Oliveira
James M. Weygand
Eftyhia Zesta
Chigomezyo M. Ngwira
Michael D. Hartinger
Zhonghua Xu
Barbara L. Giles
Daniel J. Gershman
Marcos V. D. Silveira
Vítor M. Souza
author_facet Denny M. Oliveira
James M. Weygand
Eftyhia Zesta
Chigomezyo M. Ngwira
Michael D. Hartinger
Zhonghua Xu
Barbara L. Giles
Daniel J. Gershman
Marcos V. D. Silveira
Vítor M. Souza
author_sort Denny M. Oliveira
collection DOAJ
description Abstract The impact of interplanetary shocks on the magnetosphere can trigger magnetic substorms that intensify auroral electrojet currents. These currents enhance ground magnetic field perturbations (dB/dt), which in turn generate geomagnetically induced currents (GICs) that can be detrimental to power transmission infrastructure. We perform a comparative study of dB/dt variations in response to two similarly strong shocks, but with one being nearly frontal and the other highly inclined. Multi‐instrument analyses by the Time History of Events and Macroscale Interactions during Substorms (THEMIS) and Los Alamos National Laboratory spacecraft show that nightside substorm‐time energetic particle injections are more intense and occur faster in the case of the nearly head‐on impact. The same trend is observed in dB/dt variations recorded by THEMIS ground magnetometers. THEMIS all‐sky imager data show a fast and clear poleward auroral expansion in the first case, which does not clearly occur in the second case. Strong field‐aligned currents computed with the spherical elementary current system (SECS) technique occur in both cases, but the current variations resulting from the inclined shock impact are weaker and slower compared to the nearly frontal case. SECS analyses also reveal that geographic areas with dB/dt surpassing the thresholds 1.5 and 5 nT/s, usually linked to high‐risk GICs, are larger and occur earlier due to the symmetric compression caused by the nearly head‐on impact. These results, with profound space weather implications, suggest that shock impact angles affect the geospace driving conditions and the location and intensity of the subsequent dB/dt variations during substorm activity.
format Article
id doaj-art-2b2f3ae525ce469ca97bb5d94c16dc90
institution Kabale University
issn 1542-7390
language English
publishDate 2021-12-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Space Weather
spelling doaj-art-2b2f3ae525ce469ca97bb5d94c16dc902025-01-14T16:27:22ZengWileySpace Weather1542-73902021-12-011912n/an/a10.1029/2021SW002933Impact Angle Control of Local Intense dB/dt Variations During Shock‐Induced SubstormsDenny M. Oliveira0James M. Weygand1Eftyhia Zesta2Chigomezyo M. Ngwira3Michael D. Hartinger4Zhonghua Xu5Barbara L. Giles6Daniel J. Gershman7Marcos V. D. Silveira8Vítor M. Souza9Goddard Planetary Heliophysics Institute University of Maryland, Baltimore County Baltimore MD USADepartment of Earth, Planetary, and Space Sciences University of California Los Angeles Los Angeles CA USAHeliophysics Science Division NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt MD USAAtmospheric and Space Technology Research Associates LLC Louisville CO USASpace Science Institute Boulder CO USACenter for Space Science and Engineering Research Virginia Tech Blacksburg VA USAHeliophysics Science Division NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt MD USAHeliophysics Science Division NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt MD USANational Institute for Space Research – INPE São José dos Campos BrazilNational Institute for Space Research – INPE São José dos Campos BrazilAbstract The impact of interplanetary shocks on the magnetosphere can trigger magnetic substorms that intensify auroral electrojet currents. These currents enhance ground magnetic field perturbations (dB/dt), which in turn generate geomagnetically induced currents (GICs) that can be detrimental to power transmission infrastructure. We perform a comparative study of dB/dt variations in response to two similarly strong shocks, but with one being nearly frontal and the other highly inclined. Multi‐instrument analyses by the Time History of Events and Macroscale Interactions during Substorms (THEMIS) and Los Alamos National Laboratory spacecraft show that nightside substorm‐time energetic particle injections are more intense and occur faster in the case of the nearly head‐on impact. The same trend is observed in dB/dt variations recorded by THEMIS ground magnetometers. THEMIS all‐sky imager data show a fast and clear poleward auroral expansion in the first case, which does not clearly occur in the second case. Strong field‐aligned currents computed with the spherical elementary current system (SECS) technique occur in both cases, but the current variations resulting from the inclined shock impact are weaker and slower compared to the nearly frontal case. SECS analyses also reveal that geographic areas with dB/dt surpassing the thresholds 1.5 and 5 nT/s, usually linked to high‐risk GICs, are larger and occur earlier due to the symmetric compression caused by the nearly head‐on impact. These results, with profound space weather implications, suggest that shock impact angles affect the geospace driving conditions and the location and intensity of the subsequent dB/dt variations during substorm activity.https://doi.org/10.1029/2021SW002933interplanetary shocksshock impact angleauroral substormsgeomagnetically induced currents
spellingShingle Denny M. Oliveira
James M. Weygand
Eftyhia Zesta
Chigomezyo M. Ngwira
Michael D. Hartinger
Zhonghua Xu
Barbara L. Giles
Daniel J. Gershman
Marcos V. D. Silveira
Vítor M. Souza
Impact Angle Control of Local Intense dB/dt Variations During Shock‐Induced Substorms
Space Weather
interplanetary shocks
shock impact angle
auroral substorms
geomagnetically induced currents
title Impact Angle Control of Local Intense dB/dt Variations During Shock‐Induced Substorms
title_full Impact Angle Control of Local Intense dB/dt Variations During Shock‐Induced Substorms
title_fullStr Impact Angle Control of Local Intense dB/dt Variations During Shock‐Induced Substorms
title_full_unstemmed Impact Angle Control of Local Intense dB/dt Variations During Shock‐Induced Substorms
title_short Impact Angle Control of Local Intense dB/dt Variations During Shock‐Induced Substorms
title_sort impact angle control of local intense db dt variations during shock induced substorms
topic interplanetary shocks
shock impact angle
auroral substorms
geomagnetically induced currents
url https://doi.org/10.1029/2021SW002933
work_keys_str_mv AT dennymoliveira impactanglecontroloflocalintensedbdtvariationsduringshockinducedsubstorms
AT jamesmweygand impactanglecontroloflocalintensedbdtvariationsduringshockinducedsubstorms
AT eftyhiazesta impactanglecontroloflocalintensedbdtvariationsduringshockinducedsubstorms
AT chigomezyomngwira impactanglecontroloflocalintensedbdtvariationsduringshockinducedsubstorms
AT michaeldhartinger impactanglecontroloflocalintensedbdtvariationsduringshockinducedsubstorms
AT zhonghuaxu impactanglecontroloflocalintensedbdtvariationsduringshockinducedsubstorms
AT barbaralgiles impactanglecontroloflocalintensedbdtvariationsduringshockinducedsubstorms
AT danieljgershman impactanglecontroloflocalintensedbdtvariationsduringshockinducedsubstorms
AT marcosvdsilveira impactanglecontroloflocalintensedbdtvariationsduringshockinducedsubstorms
AT vitormsouza impactanglecontroloflocalintensedbdtvariationsduringshockinducedsubstorms