Editorial

In June 2016 the South African Commission on Gender Equality declared that a local KwaZulu-Natal municipality’s scheme of “bursaries for virgins” was unlawful, unconstitutional, and discriminatory. The findings and recommendations of the report were celebrated by gender activists who welcomed the r...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sarojini Nadar, Fatima Seedat
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: UJ Press 2022-09-01
Series:African Journal of Gender and Religion (AJGR)
Online Access:https://journals.uj.ac.za/index.php/ajgr/article/view/1489
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850114407662616576
author Sarojini Nadar
Fatima Seedat
author_facet Sarojini Nadar
Fatima Seedat
author_sort Sarojini Nadar
collection DOAJ
description In June 2016 the South African Commission on Gender Equality declared that a local KwaZulu-Natal municipality’s scheme of “bursaries for virgins” was unlawful, unconstitutional, and discriminatory. The findings and recommendations of the report were celebrated by gender activists who welcomed the recognition of the CGE that this scheme was marked by culturally patriarchal ideals of women’s bodies. Significant within the celebrations of the ruling, was little evidence of deep and thoughtful engagement with the tensions between provisions by the constitution of South Africa for cultural and religious freedom and women’s bodily autonomy. Moreover, the ruling brought up for introspection an interrogation of the ways in which femininity and masculinity are conceptualized within religious and cultural domains. This and other contemporary case studies within South Africa and beyond, highlight the need for continuous and sustained theoretical and philosophical engagement on the intersections of gender, religion and culture that is firmly rooted within an advocacy paradigm.
format Article
id doaj-art-2affa3285d624864910b1ab74b8d2f52
institution OA Journals
issn 2707-2991
language English
publishDate 2022-09-01
publisher UJ Press
record_format Article
series African Journal of Gender and Religion (AJGR)
spelling doaj-art-2affa3285d624864910b1ab74b8d2f522025-08-20T02:36:53ZengUJ PressAfrican Journal of Gender and Religion (AJGR)2707-29912022-09-0122110.36615/ajgr.v22i1.1489EditorialSarojini Nadar0https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6308-3454Fatima Seedat1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1099-1675University of the Western CapeUniversity of Cape Town In June 2016 the South African Commission on Gender Equality declared that a local KwaZulu-Natal municipality’s scheme of “bursaries for virgins” was unlawful, unconstitutional, and discriminatory. The findings and recommendations of the report were celebrated by gender activists who welcomed the recognition of the CGE that this scheme was marked by culturally patriarchal ideals of women’s bodies. Significant within the celebrations of the ruling, was little evidence of deep and thoughtful engagement with the tensions between provisions by the constitution of South Africa for cultural and religious freedom and women’s bodily autonomy. Moreover, the ruling brought up for introspection an interrogation of the ways in which femininity and masculinity are conceptualized within religious and cultural domains. This and other contemporary case studies within South Africa and beyond, highlight the need for continuous and sustained theoretical and philosophical engagement on the intersections of gender, religion and culture that is firmly rooted within an advocacy paradigm. https://journals.uj.ac.za/index.php/ajgr/article/view/1489
spellingShingle Sarojini Nadar
Fatima Seedat
Editorial
African Journal of Gender and Religion (AJGR)
title Editorial
title_full Editorial
title_fullStr Editorial
title_full_unstemmed Editorial
title_short Editorial
title_sort editorial
url https://journals.uj.ac.za/index.php/ajgr/article/view/1489
work_keys_str_mv AT sarojininadar editorial
AT fatimaseedat editorial