Analyzing the Environmental Impacts and Empirical Limitations of Green Remodeling with Life Cycle Assessment

The Government of Korea uses green remodeling (GR) as a central policy for achieving carbon neutrality in the building sector. However, despite GR’s energy-saving benefits, it raises embodied carbon (EC) due to the incorporation of new materials, and there is a lack of impact analysis and assessment...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jaemoon Kim, Wonkyeong Ko, Jaehee Kim, Jiyeon Byun, Seonghoon Nam, Subin Jeong
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2025-02-01
Series:Buildings
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2075-5309/15/5/783
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850051771201748992
author Jaemoon Kim
Wonkyeong Ko
Jaehee Kim
Jiyeon Byun
Seonghoon Nam
Subin Jeong
author_facet Jaemoon Kim
Wonkyeong Ko
Jaehee Kim
Jiyeon Byun
Seonghoon Nam
Subin Jeong
author_sort Jaemoon Kim
collection DOAJ
description The Government of Korea uses green remodeling (GR) as a central policy for achieving carbon neutrality in the building sector. However, despite GR’s energy-saving benefits, it raises embodied carbon (EC) due to the incorporation of new materials, and there is a lack of impact analysis and assessment research. Thus, this study established the GR-LCA methodology to evaluate the environmental impacts (EIs) of GR, including EC. The methodology disaggregated and assessed the effects of EC and energy on GR in terms of GR’s proportion of EC, six EI categories, and the carbon reduction impacts. The analysis revealed that GR’s EC accounted for 10.6%, reducing to 9.89% when EPD materials were used. In terms of the reduction impact across six EIs, GWP was reduced to 0.84 and EP to 0.96. However, ODP, ADP, AP, and POCP, all elevated by high EIs from material inputs, increased to 626.7, 1.04, 1.16, and 250.09, respectively. Ultimately, the carbon reduction in GR was 24.9% when considering only energy usage, and 16.1% when including EC. When EPD materials were applied, the efficiency of reduction improved by an additional 0.6%, indicating a minimal application effect. Based on these findings, the differences in GR’s EC compared to new constructions, reduction limitations, and potential improvements were discussed.
format Article
id doaj-art-2aff5cc0f8d042978c0e47bc0fe15841
institution DOAJ
issn 2075-5309
language English
publishDate 2025-02-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Buildings
spelling doaj-art-2aff5cc0f8d042978c0e47bc0fe158412025-08-20T02:53:02ZengMDPI AGBuildings2075-53092025-02-0115578310.3390/buildings15050783Analyzing the Environmental Impacts and Empirical Limitations of Green Remodeling with Life Cycle AssessmentJaemoon Kim0Wonkyeong Ko1Jaehee Kim2Jiyeon Byun3Seonghoon Nam4Subin Jeong5Technology Research Institution, SAMOOCM Architect and Engineers, Seoul 05556, Republic of KoreaTechnology Research Institution, SAMOOCM Architect and Engineers, Seoul 05556, Republic of KoreaTechnology Research Institution, SAMOOCM Architect and Engineers, Seoul 05556, Republic of KoreaTechnology Research Institution, SAMOOCM Architect and Engineers, Seoul 05556, Republic of KoreaTechnology Research Institution, SAMOOCM Architect and Engineers, Seoul 05556, Republic of KoreaDepartment of Green Smart Architectural Engineering/Graduate School of Energy Systems Engineering, Kongju National University, Gongju-si 32588, Republic of KoreaThe Government of Korea uses green remodeling (GR) as a central policy for achieving carbon neutrality in the building sector. However, despite GR’s energy-saving benefits, it raises embodied carbon (EC) due to the incorporation of new materials, and there is a lack of impact analysis and assessment research. Thus, this study established the GR-LCA methodology to evaluate the environmental impacts (EIs) of GR, including EC. The methodology disaggregated and assessed the effects of EC and energy on GR in terms of GR’s proportion of EC, six EI categories, and the carbon reduction impacts. The analysis revealed that GR’s EC accounted for 10.6%, reducing to 9.89% when EPD materials were used. In terms of the reduction impact across six EIs, GWP was reduced to 0.84 and EP to 0.96. However, ODP, ADP, AP, and POCP, all elevated by high EIs from material inputs, increased to 626.7, 1.04, 1.16, and 250.09, respectively. Ultimately, the carbon reduction in GR was 24.9% when considering only energy usage, and 16.1% when including EC. When EPD materials were applied, the efficiency of reduction improved by an additional 0.6%, indicating a minimal application effect. Based on these findings, the differences in GR’s EC compared to new constructions, reduction limitations, and potential improvements were discussed.https://www.mdpi.com/2075-5309/15/5/783green remodeling (GR)embodied carbon (EC)environmental impacts (EIs)building-LCAGR-LCAEPD materials
spellingShingle Jaemoon Kim
Wonkyeong Ko
Jaehee Kim
Jiyeon Byun
Seonghoon Nam
Subin Jeong
Analyzing the Environmental Impacts and Empirical Limitations of Green Remodeling with Life Cycle Assessment
Buildings
green remodeling (GR)
embodied carbon (EC)
environmental impacts (EIs)
building-LCA
GR-LCA
EPD materials
title Analyzing the Environmental Impacts and Empirical Limitations of Green Remodeling with Life Cycle Assessment
title_full Analyzing the Environmental Impacts and Empirical Limitations of Green Remodeling with Life Cycle Assessment
title_fullStr Analyzing the Environmental Impacts and Empirical Limitations of Green Remodeling with Life Cycle Assessment
title_full_unstemmed Analyzing the Environmental Impacts and Empirical Limitations of Green Remodeling with Life Cycle Assessment
title_short Analyzing the Environmental Impacts and Empirical Limitations of Green Remodeling with Life Cycle Assessment
title_sort analyzing the environmental impacts and empirical limitations of green remodeling with life cycle assessment
topic green remodeling (GR)
embodied carbon (EC)
environmental impacts (EIs)
building-LCA
GR-LCA
EPD materials
url https://www.mdpi.com/2075-5309/15/5/783
work_keys_str_mv AT jaemoonkim analyzingtheenvironmentalimpactsandempiricallimitationsofgreenremodelingwithlifecycleassessment
AT wonkyeongko analyzingtheenvironmentalimpactsandempiricallimitationsofgreenremodelingwithlifecycleassessment
AT jaeheekim analyzingtheenvironmentalimpactsandempiricallimitationsofgreenremodelingwithlifecycleassessment
AT jiyeonbyun analyzingtheenvironmentalimpactsandempiricallimitationsofgreenremodelingwithlifecycleassessment
AT seonghoonnam analyzingtheenvironmentalimpactsandempiricallimitationsofgreenremodelingwithlifecycleassessment
AT subinjeong analyzingtheenvironmentalimpactsandempiricallimitationsofgreenremodelingwithlifecycleassessment