Does incidental durotomy affect clinical outcome in patients with lumbar degenerative diseases after posterior open lumbar interbody fusion? a multicenter observational study

Abstract Background Incidental durotomy (ID) during spinal surgery is common during spinal surgery. This study aimed to determine whether intraoperative ID affects the perioperative and long-term clinical outcomes in patients with degenerative lumbar disease (DLD) undergoing posterior open lumbar in...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zhendong Huan, Linkai Lei
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2025-04-01
Series:Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-025-05792-2
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850181384490975232
author Zhendong Huan
Linkai Lei
author_facet Zhendong Huan
Linkai Lei
author_sort Zhendong Huan
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Incidental durotomy (ID) during spinal surgery is common during spinal surgery. This study aimed to determine whether intraoperative ID affects the perioperative and long-term clinical outcomes in patients with degenerative lumbar disease (DLD) undergoing posterior open lumbar interbody fusion (POLIF). Methods This multicenter observational study was conducted at two spinal centers between January 2020 and December 2022. The patients were divided into ID and non-ID groups according to whether ID occurred intraoperatively. Primary outcome measure was the length of hospital stay (LOS), while secondary outcome measures were 30-day readmission rate; hospital costs; postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) scores for low back pain (LBP) and leg pain (LP) at 1 day, 3, 7, and 15 days, 1 month, 3, 6, and 12 months; and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) at 1 month, 3, 6, and 12 months. Results Intraoperative ID occurred in 8.7% (36/415) patients. LOS, operative time, estimated blood loss, 30-day readmission rate, and hospital costs were significantly higher in the ID group. On average, the LOS increased by 2.9 days and hospital costs increased by 4800.2 yuan per patient. The ID group had significantly higher baseline VAS scores for LBP 15 days and 1 month postoperatively than the non-ID group. The ODI was significantly higher in the ID group than in the non-ID group 1 month postoperatively. No significant differences were noted in the VAS scores and ODI between the two groups at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. Finally, we found that a higher BMI (P = 0.035, OR: 1.195, 95%CI: 1.012–1.412) and revision surgery (P = 0.022, OR: 2.901, 95%CI: 1.164–7.233) were risk factors for intraoperative ID. Conclusions Although ID does not significantly affect the long-term outcomes in patients with DLD after POLIF, it can lead to poorer perioperative clinical outcomes. Lumbar fusion surgery should be performed meticulously to minimize the incidence of intraoperative ID.
format Article
id doaj-art-2afa6b30706e48f3a6a12b5f29dbd936
institution OA Journals
issn 1749-799X
language English
publishDate 2025-04-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
spelling doaj-art-2afa6b30706e48f3a6a12b5f29dbd9362025-08-20T02:17:56ZengBMCJournal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research1749-799X2025-04-012011910.1186/s13018-025-05792-2Does incidental durotomy affect clinical outcome in patients with lumbar degenerative diseases after posterior open lumbar interbody fusion? a multicenter observational studyZhendong Huan0Linkai Lei1Department of Trauma Orthopedics, Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital Affiliated to Qingdao UniversityDepartment of Spine Surgery, Yantaishan HospitalAbstract Background Incidental durotomy (ID) during spinal surgery is common during spinal surgery. This study aimed to determine whether intraoperative ID affects the perioperative and long-term clinical outcomes in patients with degenerative lumbar disease (DLD) undergoing posterior open lumbar interbody fusion (POLIF). Methods This multicenter observational study was conducted at two spinal centers between January 2020 and December 2022. The patients were divided into ID and non-ID groups according to whether ID occurred intraoperatively. Primary outcome measure was the length of hospital stay (LOS), while secondary outcome measures were 30-day readmission rate; hospital costs; postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) scores for low back pain (LBP) and leg pain (LP) at 1 day, 3, 7, and 15 days, 1 month, 3, 6, and 12 months; and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) at 1 month, 3, 6, and 12 months. Results Intraoperative ID occurred in 8.7% (36/415) patients. LOS, operative time, estimated blood loss, 30-day readmission rate, and hospital costs were significantly higher in the ID group. On average, the LOS increased by 2.9 days and hospital costs increased by 4800.2 yuan per patient. The ID group had significantly higher baseline VAS scores for LBP 15 days and 1 month postoperatively than the non-ID group. The ODI was significantly higher in the ID group than in the non-ID group 1 month postoperatively. No significant differences were noted in the VAS scores and ODI between the two groups at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. Finally, we found that a higher BMI (P = 0.035, OR: 1.195, 95%CI: 1.012–1.412) and revision surgery (P = 0.022, OR: 2.901, 95%CI: 1.164–7.233) were risk factors for intraoperative ID. Conclusions Although ID does not significantly affect the long-term outcomes in patients with DLD after POLIF, it can lead to poorer perioperative clinical outcomes. Lumbar fusion surgery should be performed meticulously to minimize the incidence of intraoperative ID.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-025-05792-2Degenerative lumbar diseasesPosterior open lumbar interbody fusionIncidental durotomyClinical outcomesRisk factor
spellingShingle Zhendong Huan
Linkai Lei
Does incidental durotomy affect clinical outcome in patients with lumbar degenerative diseases after posterior open lumbar interbody fusion? a multicenter observational study
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
Degenerative lumbar diseases
Posterior open lumbar interbody fusion
Incidental durotomy
Clinical outcomes
Risk factor
title Does incidental durotomy affect clinical outcome in patients with lumbar degenerative diseases after posterior open lumbar interbody fusion? a multicenter observational study
title_full Does incidental durotomy affect clinical outcome in patients with lumbar degenerative diseases after posterior open lumbar interbody fusion? a multicenter observational study
title_fullStr Does incidental durotomy affect clinical outcome in patients with lumbar degenerative diseases after posterior open lumbar interbody fusion? a multicenter observational study
title_full_unstemmed Does incidental durotomy affect clinical outcome in patients with lumbar degenerative diseases after posterior open lumbar interbody fusion? a multicenter observational study
title_short Does incidental durotomy affect clinical outcome in patients with lumbar degenerative diseases after posterior open lumbar interbody fusion? a multicenter observational study
title_sort does incidental durotomy affect clinical outcome in patients with lumbar degenerative diseases after posterior open lumbar interbody fusion a multicenter observational study
topic Degenerative lumbar diseases
Posterior open lumbar interbody fusion
Incidental durotomy
Clinical outcomes
Risk factor
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-025-05792-2
work_keys_str_mv AT zhendonghuan doesincidentaldurotomyaffectclinicaloutcomeinpatientswithlumbardegenerativediseasesafterposterioropenlumbarinterbodyfusionamulticenterobservationalstudy
AT linkailei doesincidentaldurotomyaffectclinicaloutcomeinpatientswithlumbardegenerativediseasesafterposterioropenlumbarinterbodyfusionamulticenterobservationalstudy