Effectiveness and safety of adalimumab compared with leflunomide in patients with Takayasu arteritis: a retrospective cohort study

Objective This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of adalimumab (ADA) compared with leflunomide (LEF) in patients with Takayasu arteritis (TAK).Method A retrospective cohort study was performed with the following inclusion criteria: the fulfilment of the 2022 American College Classi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Faustino Peron Filho, Andressa de Souza Moreira, Anna Larissa Faria Janes, Alexandre W S de Souza
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMJ Publishing Group 2024-02-01
Series:RMD Open
Online Access:https://rmdopen.bmj.com/content/10/1/e003992.full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850280997978898432
author Faustino Peron Filho
Andressa de Souza Moreira
Anna Larissa Faria Janes
Alexandre W S de Souza
author_facet Faustino Peron Filho
Andressa de Souza Moreira
Anna Larissa Faria Janes
Alexandre W S de Souza
author_sort Faustino Peron Filho
collection DOAJ
description Objective This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of adalimumab (ADA) compared with leflunomide (LEF) in patients with Takayasu arteritis (TAK).Method A retrospective cohort study was performed with the following inclusion criteria: the fulfilment of the 2022 American College Classification/European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology criteria for TAK, age ≥18 years, and written informed consent. Forty-four patients were treated with LEF (n=28) or ADA (n=16) therapy due to relapsing/refractory disease or toxicity from previous therapy. Patients were evaluated at baseline (T0), at a median of 7.0 months (T1) and at 15.0 months of follow-up (T2). Data regarding disease activity, daily dose of prednisone, side effects and angiographic progression were analysed.Results LEF and ADA groups had similar features on the baseline visit. However, intravenous methylprednisolone was more frequently prescribed for the ADA group (p=0.019). On T1 and T2 visits, complete response rates were similar for ADA and LEF groups (75.0% and 88.5%; p=0.397 and 62.5% vs 78.3%; p=0.307), respectively. The differences remained non-significant after adjusting for baseline variables by propensity score matching. Although the ADA group had a higher median daily prednisone on visit T1 (p=0.004), it was similar on visit T2 (p=0.595). Similar rates of angiographic progression were observed in ADA and LEF groups (40% vs 25%; p=0.467). Mild-to-moderate adverse events were observed only in the LEF group (17.9%).Conclusion LEF and ADA had comparable outcomes after a median of 15.0 months of follow-up. However, withdrawal from therapy and mild-to-moderate adverse events were only observed in the LEF group.
format Article
id doaj-art-2a8cf21cc57b4e509caa13c8a9d15389
institution OA Journals
issn 2056-5933
language English
publishDate 2024-02-01
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format Article
series RMD Open
spelling doaj-art-2a8cf21cc57b4e509caa13c8a9d153892025-08-20T01:48:30ZengBMJ Publishing GroupRMD Open2056-59332024-02-0110110.1136/rmdopen-2023-003992Effectiveness and safety of adalimumab compared with leflunomide in patients with Takayasu arteritis: a retrospective cohort studyFaustino Peron Filho0Andressa de Souza Moreira1Anna Larissa Faria Janes2Alexandre W S de Souza3Rheumatology Division, Department of Medicine, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Sao Paulo, BrazilRheumatology Division, Department of Medicine, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Sao Paulo, BrazilRheumatology Division, Department of Medicine, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Sao Paulo, BrazilRheumatology Division, Department of Medicine, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Sao Paulo, BrazilObjective This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of adalimumab (ADA) compared with leflunomide (LEF) in patients with Takayasu arteritis (TAK).Method A retrospective cohort study was performed with the following inclusion criteria: the fulfilment of the 2022 American College Classification/European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology criteria for TAK, age ≥18 years, and written informed consent. Forty-four patients were treated with LEF (n=28) or ADA (n=16) therapy due to relapsing/refractory disease or toxicity from previous therapy. Patients were evaluated at baseline (T0), at a median of 7.0 months (T1) and at 15.0 months of follow-up (T2). Data regarding disease activity, daily dose of prednisone, side effects and angiographic progression were analysed.Results LEF and ADA groups had similar features on the baseline visit. However, intravenous methylprednisolone was more frequently prescribed for the ADA group (p=0.019). On T1 and T2 visits, complete response rates were similar for ADA and LEF groups (75.0% and 88.5%; p=0.397 and 62.5% vs 78.3%; p=0.307), respectively. The differences remained non-significant after adjusting for baseline variables by propensity score matching. Although the ADA group had a higher median daily prednisone on visit T1 (p=0.004), it was similar on visit T2 (p=0.595). Similar rates of angiographic progression were observed in ADA and LEF groups (40% vs 25%; p=0.467). Mild-to-moderate adverse events were observed only in the LEF group (17.9%).Conclusion LEF and ADA had comparable outcomes after a median of 15.0 months of follow-up. However, withdrawal from therapy and mild-to-moderate adverse events were only observed in the LEF group.https://rmdopen.bmj.com/content/10/1/e003992.full
spellingShingle Faustino Peron Filho
Andressa de Souza Moreira
Anna Larissa Faria Janes
Alexandre W S de Souza
Effectiveness and safety of adalimumab compared with leflunomide in patients with Takayasu arteritis: a retrospective cohort study
RMD Open
title Effectiveness and safety of adalimumab compared with leflunomide in patients with Takayasu arteritis: a retrospective cohort study
title_full Effectiveness and safety of adalimumab compared with leflunomide in patients with Takayasu arteritis: a retrospective cohort study
title_fullStr Effectiveness and safety of adalimumab compared with leflunomide in patients with Takayasu arteritis: a retrospective cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness and safety of adalimumab compared with leflunomide in patients with Takayasu arteritis: a retrospective cohort study
title_short Effectiveness and safety of adalimumab compared with leflunomide in patients with Takayasu arteritis: a retrospective cohort study
title_sort effectiveness and safety of adalimumab compared with leflunomide in patients with takayasu arteritis a retrospective cohort study
url https://rmdopen.bmj.com/content/10/1/e003992.full
work_keys_str_mv AT faustinoperonfilho effectivenessandsafetyofadalimumabcomparedwithleflunomideinpatientswithtakayasuarteritisaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT andressadesouzamoreira effectivenessandsafetyofadalimumabcomparedwithleflunomideinpatientswithtakayasuarteritisaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT annalarissafariajanes effectivenessandsafetyofadalimumabcomparedwithleflunomideinpatientswithtakayasuarteritisaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT alexandrewsdesouza effectivenessandsafetyofadalimumabcomparedwithleflunomideinpatientswithtakayasuarteritisaretrospectivecohortstudy