Comparative Outcomes of Video vs. Direct Laryngoscopy in Adults in Critical Condition: A Narrative Review of First-Attempt Success, Complications, and Contextual Decision-Making

Tracheal intubation emerges as a fundamental medical procedure for critically ill patients, facilitating the establishment of a secure airway and ensuring adequate oxygenation and ventilation. This narrative review compares video laryngoscopy (VL) and direct laryngoscopy (DL) in critically ill adult...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Cristian Camilo Villa Gómez, Camilo Hernández Ortiz, Julio Andrés Boda Garnica, Omar Andrés Olea Muñoz, Daniela Giraldo Restrepo, Angie Marcela Pérez Pinto, Marlon Andrés David Orrego, Luisa Fernanda Herrera Aguirre, Gustavo Adolfo Serrano Baez
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Emergency Department of Hospital San Pedro (Logroño, Spain) 2025-04-01
Series:Iberoamerican Journal of Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.53986/ibjm.2025.0014
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849409383623032832
author Cristian Camilo Villa Gómez
Camilo Hernández Ortiz
Julio Andrés Boda Garnica
Omar Andrés Olea Muñoz
Daniela Giraldo Restrepo
Angie Marcela Pérez Pinto
Marlon Andrés David Orrego
Luisa Fernanda Herrera Aguirre
Gustavo Adolfo Serrano Baez
author_facet Cristian Camilo Villa Gómez
Camilo Hernández Ortiz
Julio Andrés Boda Garnica
Omar Andrés Olea Muñoz
Daniela Giraldo Restrepo
Angie Marcela Pérez Pinto
Marlon Andrés David Orrego
Luisa Fernanda Herrera Aguirre
Gustavo Adolfo Serrano Baez
author_sort Cristian Camilo Villa Gómez
collection DOAJ
description Tracheal intubation emerges as a fundamental medical procedure for critically ill patients, facilitating the establishment of a secure airway and ensuring adequate oxygenation and ventilation. This narrative review compares video laryngoscopy (VL) and direct laryngoscopy (DL) in critically ill adults, evaluating three key parameters: first-attempt success rates, incidence of severe complications (hypoxemia, hemodynamic instability), and contextual factors influencing technique selection (patient anatomy, operator expertise, resource availability). Literature review found that challenges frequently arise in critically ill patients, influencing their respiratory, cardiovascular, and neurological systems. The primary techniques for tracheal intubation include DL and VL. Various studies have compared these techniques across diverse clinical scenarios. While some studies suggest potential advantages of VL, such as higher first-attempt success rates, others report no significant disparities. These findings underscore the inherent complexities in decision-making. To make an informed choice, considerations must include patient anatomy, operator experience, equipment availability, continuous monitoring, and adherence to clinical guidelines. Thus, the determination between DL and VL for intubating critically ill patients is multifaceted. Individual patient assessment, clinician proficiency, and resource accessibility are of paramount importance. Adherence to best practices and the ability to dynamically adapt to unforeseen challenges are critical aspects. Patient safety remains the highest priority, and these strategies provide a comprehensive framework for informed decision-making in critical scenarios. Ongoing research and continuous evaluation of clinical guidelines are essential endeavors to enhance our understanding of the most suitable technique for specific circumstances.
format Article
id doaj-art-2a78228c55e244ccb8044fb7b0bd006a
institution Kabale University
issn 2695-5075
language English
publishDate 2025-04-01
publisher Emergency Department of Hospital San Pedro (Logroño, Spain)
record_format Article
series Iberoamerican Journal of Medicine
spelling doaj-art-2a78228c55e244ccb8044fb7b0bd006a2025-08-20T03:35:32ZengEmergency Department of Hospital San Pedro (Logroño, Spain)Iberoamerican Journal of Medicine2695-50752025-04-0173869210.53986/ibjm.2025.0014Comparative Outcomes of Video vs. Direct Laryngoscopy in Adults in Critical Condition: A Narrative Review of First-Attempt Success, Complications, and Contextual Decision-MakingCristian Camilo Villa Gómez0https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8425-6078Camilo Hernández Ortiz1https://orcid.org/0009-0003-3719-2456Julio Andrés Boda Garnica2https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3213-9376Omar Andrés Olea Muñoz3https://orcid.org/0009-0009-8136-9486Daniela Giraldo Restrepo4https://orcid.org/0009-0007-8248-1985Angie Marcela Pérez Pinto5https://orcid.org/0009-0004-5290-7517Marlon Andrés David Orrego6https://orcid.org/0009-0001-8593-3365Luisa Fernanda Herrera Aguirre7Gustavo Adolfo Serrano Baez8https://orcid.org/0009-0002-7236-2396Universidad de Antioquia, Medellín, ColombiaUniversidad Cooperativa de Colombia, Medellín, ColombiaUniversidad Cooperativa de Colombia, Medellín, ColombiaUniversidad Cooperativa de Colombia, Medellín, ColombiaUniversidad Cooperativa de Colombia, Medellín, ColombiaUniversidad de Antioquia, Medellín, ColombiaUniversidad Cooperativa de Colombia, Medellín, ColombiaUniversidad Cooperativa de Colombia, Medellín, ColombiaFundación Oftalmológica de Santander, Clínica Ardila Lulle, Bucaramanga, ColombiaTracheal intubation emerges as a fundamental medical procedure for critically ill patients, facilitating the establishment of a secure airway and ensuring adequate oxygenation and ventilation. This narrative review compares video laryngoscopy (VL) and direct laryngoscopy (DL) in critically ill adults, evaluating three key parameters: first-attempt success rates, incidence of severe complications (hypoxemia, hemodynamic instability), and contextual factors influencing technique selection (patient anatomy, operator expertise, resource availability). Literature review found that challenges frequently arise in critically ill patients, influencing their respiratory, cardiovascular, and neurological systems. The primary techniques for tracheal intubation include DL and VL. Various studies have compared these techniques across diverse clinical scenarios. While some studies suggest potential advantages of VL, such as higher first-attempt success rates, others report no significant disparities. These findings underscore the inherent complexities in decision-making. To make an informed choice, considerations must include patient anatomy, operator experience, equipment availability, continuous monitoring, and adherence to clinical guidelines. Thus, the determination between DL and VL for intubating critically ill patients is multifaceted. Individual patient assessment, clinician proficiency, and resource accessibility are of paramount importance. Adherence to best practices and the ability to dynamically adapt to unforeseen challenges are critical aspects. Patient safety remains the highest priority, and these strategies provide a comprehensive framework for informed decision-making in critical scenarios. Ongoing research and continuous evaluation of clinical guidelines are essential endeavors to enhance our understanding of the most suitable technique for specific circumstances.https://doi.org/10.53986/ibjm.2025.0014intubationairway managementintesive care unitsafety
spellingShingle Cristian Camilo Villa Gómez
Camilo Hernández Ortiz
Julio Andrés Boda Garnica
Omar Andrés Olea Muñoz
Daniela Giraldo Restrepo
Angie Marcela Pérez Pinto
Marlon Andrés David Orrego
Luisa Fernanda Herrera Aguirre
Gustavo Adolfo Serrano Baez
Comparative Outcomes of Video vs. Direct Laryngoscopy in Adults in Critical Condition: A Narrative Review of First-Attempt Success, Complications, and Contextual Decision-Making
Iberoamerican Journal of Medicine
intubation
airway management
intesive care unit
safety
title Comparative Outcomes of Video vs. Direct Laryngoscopy in Adults in Critical Condition: A Narrative Review of First-Attempt Success, Complications, and Contextual Decision-Making
title_full Comparative Outcomes of Video vs. Direct Laryngoscopy in Adults in Critical Condition: A Narrative Review of First-Attempt Success, Complications, and Contextual Decision-Making
title_fullStr Comparative Outcomes of Video vs. Direct Laryngoscopy in Adults in Critical Condition: A Narrative Review of First-Attempt Success, Complications, and Contextual Decision-Making
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Outcomes of Video vs. Direct Laryngoscopy in Adults in Critical Condition: A Narrative Review of First-Attempt Success, Complications, and Contextual Decision-Making
title_short Comparative Outcomes of Video vs. Direct Laryngoscopy in Adults in Critical Condition: A Narrative Review of First-Attempt Success, Complications, and Contextual Decision-Making
title_sort comparative outcomes of video vs direct laryngoscopy in adults in critical condition a narrative review of first attempt success complications and contextual decision making
topic intubation
airway management
intesive care unit
safety
url https://doi.org/10.53986/ibjm.2025.0014
work_keys_str_mv AT cristiancamilovillagomez comparativeoutcomesofvideovsdirectlaryngoscopyinadultsincriticalconditionanarrativereviewoffirstattemptsuccesscomplicationsandcontextualdecisionmaking
AT camilohernandezortiz comparativeoutcomesofvideovsdirectlaryngoscopyinadultsincriticalconditionanarrativereviewoffirstattemptsuccesscomplicationsandcontextualdecisionmaking
AT julioandresbodagarnica comparativeoutcomesofvideovsdirectlaryngoscopyinadultsincriticalconditionanarrativereviewoffirstattemptsuccesscomplicationsandcontextualdecisionmaking
AT omarandresoleamunoz comparativeoutcomesofvideovsdirectlaryngoscopyinadultsincriticalconditionanarrativereviewoffirstattemptsuccesscomplicationsandcontextualdecisionmaking
AT danielagiraldorestrepo comparativeoutcomesofvideovsdirectlaryngoscopyinadultsincriticalconditionanarrativereviewoffirstattemptsuccesscomplicationsandcontextualdecisionmaking
AT angiemarcelaperezpinto comparativeoutcomesofvideovsdirectlaryngoscopyinadultsincriticalconditionanarrativereviewoffirstattemptsuccesscomplicationsandcontextualdecisionmaking
AT marlonandresdavidorrego comparativeoutcomesofvideovsdirectlaryngoscopyinadultsincriticalconditionanarrativereviewoffirstattemptsuccesscomplicationsandcontextualdecisionmaking
AT luisafernandaherreraaguirre comparativeoutcomesofvideovsdirectlaryngoscopyinadultsincriticalconditionanarrativereviewoffirstattemptsuccesscomplicationsandcontextualdecisionmaking
AT gustavoadolfoserranobaez comparativeoutcomesofvideovsdirectlaryngoscopyinadultsincriticalconditionanarrativereviewoffirstattemptsuccesscomplicationsandcontextualdecisionmaking