Comparison Between Topographic-Based and Manifest-Based Astigmatism Corrections in the Second (Visumax 800)-Generation Keratorefractive Lenticule Extraction Surgery: A Real-World Study

<b>Objectives</b>: To evaluate the effectiveness of astigmatism correction between topographic- and manifest-based methods in individuals who underwent second-generation keratorefractive lenticule extraction (KLEx) surgery. <b>Methods</b>: This study was conducted with partic...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chia-Yi Lee, Hung-Chi Chen, Shun-Fa Yang, Yi-Jen Hsueh, Chin-Te Huang, Jing-Yang Huang, Ie-Bin Lian, Chao-Kai Chang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2025-01-01
Series:Diagnostics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4418/15/1/98
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841549254318882816
author Chia-Yi Lee
Hung-Chi Chen
Shun-Fa Yang
Yi-Jen Hsueh
Chin-Te Huang
Jing-Yang Huang
Ie-Bin Lian
Chao-Kai Chang
author_facet Chia-Yi Lee
Hung-Chi Chen
Shun-Fa Yang
Yi-Jen Hsueh
Chin-Te Huang
Jing-Yang Huang
Ie-Bin Lian
Chao-Kai Chang
author_sort Chia-Yi Lee
collection DOAJ
description <b>Objectives</b>: To evaluate the effectiveness of astigmatism correction between topographic- and manifest-based methods in individuals who underwent second-generation keratorefractive lenticule extraction (KLEx) surgery. <b>Methods</b>: This study was conducted with participants who underwent second-generation KLEx surgery. After exclusion, there were 46 and 43 participants in the manifest and topographic groups, respectively. The main outcomes were postoperative uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), spherical equivalent (SE), and residual astigmatism. The independent T-test and generalized estimate equation were used to investigate differences between the two groups. <b>Results</b>: Three months postoperatively, UDVA was 0.02 ± 0.04 in the manifest group and 0.00 ± 0.06 in the topographic group which also revealed no significant difference (<i>p</i> = 0.155). Also, the SE value in the two groups three months postoperatively was statistically similar (−0.57 ± 0.48D versus −0.63 ± 0.62D, <i>p</i> = 0.574). The final residual astigmatism was −0.26 ± 0.27 in the topographic group which was significantly lower than the −0.51 ± 0.40 in the manifest group (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Moreover, the amplitude of astigmatism change was significantly lower in the topographic group (<i>p</i> = 0.002). In the subgroup analysis, UDVA and residual astigmatism were significantly better in the topographic group than in the manifest group (both <i>p</i> < 0.05). <b>Conclusions</b>: The topographic-based method represents a better astigmatism correction than the manifest-based method in second-generation KLEx surgery, especially in the low astigmatism population.
format Article
id doaj-art-2a58902974194ef1904df0a177a44c79
institution Kabale University
issn 2075-4418
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Diagnostics
spelling doaj-art-2a58902974194ef1904df0a177a44c792025-01-10T13:16:43ZengMDPI AGDiagnostics2075-44182025-01-011519810.3390/diagnostics15010098Comparison Between Topographic-Based and Manifest-Based Astigmatism Corrections in the Second (Visumax 800)-Generation Keratorefractive Lenticule Extraction Surgery: A Real-World StudyChia-Yi Lee0Hung-Chi Chen1Shun-Fa Yang2Yi-Jen Hsueh3Chin-Te Huang4Jing-Yang Huang5Ie-Bin Lian6Chao-Kai Chang7Institute of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung 40201, TaiwanDepartment of Ophthalmology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, Taoyuan 33305, TaiwanInstitute of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung 40201, TaiwanDepartment of Ophthalmology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, Taoyuan 33305, TaiwanDepartment of Ophthalmology, Chung Shan Medical University Hospital, Taichung 40201, TaiwanDepartment of Medical Research, Chung Shan Medical University Hospital, Taichung 40201, TaiwanInstitute of Statistical and Information Science, National Changhua University of Education, Chunghua 50007, TaiwanNobel Eye Institute, Taipei 10041, Taiwan<b>Objectives</b>: To evaluate the effectiveness of astigmatism correction between topographic- and manifest-based methods in individuals who underwent second-generation keratorefractive lenticule extraction (KLEx) surgery. <b>Methods</b>: This study was conducted with participants who underwent second-generation KLEx surgery. After exclusion, there were 46 and 43 participants in the manifest and topographic groups, respectively. The main outcomes were postoperative uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), spherical equivalent (SE), and residual astigmatism. The independent T-test and generalized estimate equation were used to investigate differences between the two groups. <b>Results</b>: Three months postoperatively, UDVA was 0.02 ± 0.04 in the manifest group and 0.00 ± 0.06 in the topographic group which also revealed no significant difference (<i>p</i> = 0.155). Also, the SE value in the two groups three months postoperatively was statistically similar (−0.57 ± 0.48D versus −0.63 ± 0.62D, <i>p</i> = 0.574). The final residual astigmatism was −0.26 ± 0.27 in the topographic group which was significantly lower than the −0.51 ± 0.40 in the manifest group (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Moreover, the amplitude of astigmatism change was significantly lower in the topographic group (<i>p</i> = 0.002). In the subgroup analysis, UDVA and residual astigmatism were significantly better in the topographic group than in the manifest group (both <i>p</i> < 0.05). <b>Conclusions</b>: The topographic-based method represents a better astigmatism correction than the manifest-based method in second-generation KLEx surgery, especially in the low astigmatism population.https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4418/15/1/98keratorefractive lenticule extractionvisumax 800smile prouncorrected distance visual acuityastigmatism
spellingShingle Chia-Yi Lee
Hung-Chi Chen
Shun-Fa Yang
Yi-Jen Hsueh
Chin-Te Huang
Jing-Yang Huang
Ie-Bin Lian
Chao-Kai Chang
Comparison Between Topographic-Based and Manifest-Based Astigmatism Corrections in the Second (Visumax 800)-Generation Keratorefractive Lenticule Extraction Surgery: A Real-World Study
Diagnostics
keratorefractive lenticule extraction
visumax 800
smile pro
uncorrected distance visual acuity
astigmatism
title Comparison Between Topographic-Based and Manifest-Based Astigmatism Corrections in the Second (Visumax 800)-Generation Keratorefractive Lenticule Extraction Surgery: A Real-World Study
title_full Comparison Between Topographic-Based and Manifest-Based Astigmatism Corrections in the Second (Visumax 800)-Generation Keratorefractive Lenticule Extraction Surgery: A Real-World Study
title_fullStr Comparison Between Topographic-Based and Manifest-Based Astigmatism Corrections in the Second (Visumax 800)-Generation Keratorefractive Lenticule Extraction Surgery: A Real-World Study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison Between Topographic-Based and Manifest-Based Astigmatism Corrections in the Second (Visumax 800)-Generation Keratorefractive Lenticule Extraction Surgery: A Real-World Study
title_short Comparison Between Topographic-Based and Manifest-Based Astigmatism Corrections in the Second (Visumax 800)-Generation Keratorefractive Lenticule Extraction Surgery: A Real-World Study
title_sort comparison between topographic based and manifest based astigmatism corrections in the second visumax 800 generation keratorefractive lenticule extraction surgery a real world study
topic keratorefractive lenticule extraction
visumax 800
smile pro
uncorrected distance visual acuity
astigmatism
url https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4418/15/1/98
work_keys_str_mv AT chiayilee comparisonbetweentopographicbasedandmanifestbasedastigmatismcorrectionsinthesecondvisumax800generationkeratorefractivelenticuleextractionsurgeryarealworldstudy
AT hungchichen comparisonbetweentopographicbasedandmanifestbasedastigmatismcorrectionsinthesecondvisumax800generationkeratorefractivelenticuleextractionsurgeryarealworldstudy
AT shunfayang comparisonbetweentopographicbasedandmanifestbasedastigmatismcorrectionsinthesecondvisumax800generationkeratorefractivelenticuleextractionsurgeryarealworldstudy
AT yijenhsueh comparisonbetweentopographicbasedandmanifestbasedastigmatismcorrectionsinthesecondvisumax800generationkeratorefractivelenticuleextractionsurgeryarealworldstudy
AT chintehuang comparisonbetweentopographicbasedandmanifestbasedastigmatismcorrectionsinthesecondvisumax800generationkeratorefractivelenticuleextractionsurgeryarealworldstudy
AT jingyanghuang comparisonbetweentopographicbasedandmanifestbasedastigmatismcorrectionsinthesecondvisumax800generationkeratorefractivelenticuleextractionsurgeryarealworldstudy
AT iebinlian comparisonbetweentopographicbasedandmanifestbasedastigmatismcorrectionsinthesecondvisumax800generationkeratorefractivelenticuleextractionsurgeryarealworldstudy
AT chaokaichang comparisonbetweentopographicbasedandmanifestbasedastigmatismcorrectionsinthesecondvisumax800generationkeratorefractivelenticuleextractionsurgeryarealworldstudy