Gen Z Sexual and Gender Fluidity in US Scripted Television

This essay addresses the rise in sexual and gender-fluid characters in scripted US television targeting the Gen Z audience (born 1997–2012), based on their moniker as the “queerest” generation, with over 20% of younger US and international respondents identifying as LGBTQ in polls, the majority as s...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Traci B. Abbott
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Cogitatio 2025-03-01
Series:Media and Communication
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/9374
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850150577776885760
author Traci B. Abbott
author_facet Traci B. Abbott
author_sort Traci B. Abbott
collection DOAJ
description This essay addresses the rise in sexual and gender-fluid characters in scripted US television targeting the Gen Z audience (born 1997–2012), based on their moniker as the “queerest” generation, with over 20% of younger US and international respondents identifying as LGBTQ in polls, the majority as sexually fluid (bi/pansexual) or non-binary (genderfluid/genderqueer). By analyzing six series (2019–2023) marketed as “authentically” Gen Z, I argue this shift invests in Gen Z’s “hip” attitude towards such fluidity the same way Caldwell argues that 1990’s diversification of the televisual audience produced a “programming agenda…that cultivates and rewards distinction in ethnic, racial, and class terms” (2020, p. 376). Caldwell’s (2020) theory of boutique programming, described as “a selective, signature world where artistic sensitivity went hand in hand with social relevance and viewer discrimination” (p. 164), exposes how these recent series rely on “visual flourishes…and narrative embellishments” (p. 377) but move beyond cinematic techniques by combining palatial settings and extravagant lifestyles with shockingly explicit sexual situations. Caldwell’s (2020, p. 377) assertion that “stardom and gossip defeat the dramatic obligation or need for narrative coherence” is reflected in the 21st century’s reliance on social media promotions with hypersexual imagery and expensive designer outfits for its high school-age characters and an entertainment media which highlights their “edgy,” “sexy,” “explicit,” and “provocative” content. Therefore, I argue that, like Caldwell, we should avoid “overestimat[ing] the political value” (2020, p. 376) of these presentations when these non-binary identities are shown as inaccessible, depoliticized, and hypersexualized, which maintains rather than challenges entrenched binary ideals of gender and sexuality.
format Article
id doaj-art-2a373e948ec7438cafd6e52fcb645eab
institution OA Journals
issn 2183-2439
language English
publishDate 2025-03-01
publisher Cogitatio
record_format Article
series Media and Communication
spelling doaj-art-2a373e948ec7438cafd6e52fcb645eab2025-08-20T02:26:31ZengCogitatioMedia and Communication2183-24392025-03-0113010.17645/mac.93744083Gen Z Sexual and Gender Fluidity in US Scripted TelevisionTraci B. Abbott0Department of English and Media Studies, Bentley University, USAThis essay addresses the rise in sexual and gender-fluid characters in scripted US television targeting the Gen Z audience (born 1997–2012), based on their moniker as the “queerest” generation, with over 20% of younger US and international respondents identifying as LGBTQ in polls, the majority as sexually fluid (bi/pansexual) or non-binary (genderfluid/genderqueer). By analyzing six series (2019–2023) marketed as “authentically” Gen Z, I argue this shift invests in Gen Z’s “hip” attitude towards such fluidity the same way Caldwell argues that 1990’s diversification of the televisual audience produced a “programming agenda…that cultivates and rewards distinction in ethnic, racial, and class terms” (2020, p. 376). Caldwell’s (2020) theory of boutique programming, described as “a selective, signature world where artistic sensitivity went hand in hand with social relevance and viewer discrimination” (p. 164), exposes how these recent series rely on “visual flourishes…and narrative embellishments” (p. 377) but move beyond cinematic techniques by combining palatial settings and extravagant lifestyles with shockingly explicit sexual situations. Caldwell’s (2020, p. 377) assertion that “stardom and gossip defeat the dramatic obligation or need for narrative coherence” is reflected in the 21st century’s reliance on social media promotions with hypersexual imagery and expensive designer outfits for its high school-age characters and an entertainment media which highlights their “edgy,” “sexy,” “explicit,” and “provocative” content. Therefore, I argue that, like Caldwell, we should avoid “overestimat[ing] the political value” (2020, p. 376) of these presentations when these non-binary identities are shown as inaccessible, depoliticized, and hypersexualized, which maintains rather than challenges entrenched binary ideals of gender and sexuality.https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/9374american televisionbisexualitygender non-binarygen zlgbtqtelevisiontelevisualityteen series
spellingShingle Traci B. Abbott
Gen Z Sexual and Gender Fluidity in US Scripted Television
Media and Communication
american television
bisexuality
gender non-binary
gen z
lgbtq
television
televisuality
teen series
title Gen Z Sexual and Gender Fluidity in US Scripted Television
title_full Gen Z Sexual and Gender Fluidity in US Scripted Television
title_fullStr Gen Z Sexual and Gender Fluidity in US Scripted Television
title_full_unstemmed Gen Z Sexual and Gender Fluidity in US Scripted Television
title_short Gen Z Sexual and Gender Fluidity in US Scripted Television
title_sort gen z sexual and gender fluidity in us scripted television
topic american television
bisexuality
gender non-binary
gen z
lgbtq
television
televisuality
teen series
url https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/9374
work_keys_str_mv AT tracibabbott genzsexualandgenderfluidityinusscriptedtelevision