Sulfasalzine in the management of pure axial spondyloarthritis: Need to have a relook!

The role of sulfasalazine in pure axial spondyloarthritis (axial SpA) is claimed to be almost non-existent, due to very low-quality evidence from available literature. Guidelines recommend early institution of biologic therapy if one fails 2 NSAIDs sequentially in optimal doses over 4 weeks. As NSAI...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Subramanian Shankar, Arun Hegde
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2020-01-01
Series:Indian Journal of Rheumatology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.indianjrheumatol.com/article.asp?issn=0973-3698;year=2020;volume=15;issue=5;spage=57;epage=63;aulast=Shankar
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832544043145363456
author Subramanian Shankar
Arun Hegde
author_facet Subramanian Shankar
Arun Hegde
author_sort Subramanian Shankar
collection DOAJ
description The role of sulfasalazine in pure axial spondyloarthritis (axial SpA) is claimed to be almost non-existent, due to very low-quality evidence from available literature. Guidelines recommend early institution of biologic therapy if one fails 2 NSAIDs sequentially in optimal doses over 4 weeks. As NSAIDs are effective in about 70% cases, the remaining 30% patients would require biologics within the first few weeks of onset of illness. With each passing year, a significant percentage of the remaining patients would require biologics due to NSAID failure. Relapse rates after discontinuation of TNFα inhibitors at 1-year followup is almost 100%, implying lifelong therapy with biologics. Cochrane metaanalysis reveals that ASAS 40 response (40% improvement in pain, function, and inflammation) is in the range of 25%-40% for various biologics over 24 weeks. Considering that in a country with a per Capita GDP of just Rs 1.44 lakhs/ year, where 80% of people have to meet their medical expenses out of pocket and the cheapest anti TNFs cost over Rs 2 lakhs per annum, the western guidelines are clearly impractical in Indian context. In this review article, we present a contrarian view on the use of Sulfasalazine in axial SpA. We look at the available data on Sulphasalazine with a different perspective and arrive at different conclusions. We also explore the role of other innovative strategies in the management of axial SpA and suggest alternate algorithms catering to the Indian scenario.
format Article
id doaj-art-2a214025396b4f4f89b5a1e1e7d78215
institution Kabale University
issn 0973-3698
0973-3701
language English
publishDate 2020-01-01
publisher SAGE Publishing
record_format Article
series Indian Journal of Rheumatology
spelling doaj-art-2a214025396b4f4f89b5a1e1e7d782152025-02-03T11:07:26ZengSAGE PublishingIndian Journal of Rheumatology0973-36980973-37012020-01-01155576310.4103/0973-3698.284743Sulfasalzine in the management of pure axial spondyloarthritis: Need to have a relook!Subramanian ShankarArun HegdeThe role of sulfasalazine in pure axial spondyloarthritis (axial SpA) is claimed to be almost non-existent, due to very low-quality evidence from available literature. Guidelines recommend early institution of biologic therapy if one fails 2 NSAIDs sequentially in optimal doses over 4 weeks. As NSAIDs are effective in about 70% cases, the remaining 30% patients would require biologics within the first few weeks of onset of illness. With each passing year, a significant percentage of the remaining patients would require biologics due to NSAID failure. Relapse rates after discontinuation of TNFα inhibitors at 1-year followup is almost 100%, implying lifelong therapy with biologics. Cochrane metaanalysis reveals that ASAS 40 response (40% improvement in pain, function, and inflammation) is in the range of 25%-40% for various biologics over 24 weeks. Considering that in a country with a per Capita GDP of just Rs 1.44 lakhs/ year, where 80% of people have to meet their medical expenses out of pocket and the cheapest anti TNFs cost over Rs 2 lakhs per annum, the western guidelines are clearly impractical in Indian context. In this review article, we present a contrarian view on the use of Sulfasalazine in axial SpA. We look at the available data on Sulphasalazine with a different perspective and arrive at different conclusions. We also explore the role of other innovative strategies in the management of axial SpA and suggest alternate algorithms catering to the Indian scenario.http://www.indianjrheumatol.com/article.asp?issn=0973-3698;year=2020;volume=15;issue=5;spage=57;epage=63;aulast=Shankaraxial spondyloarthritiscost effectiveinnovative strategiessulphasalazine
spellingShingle Subramanian Shankar
Arun Hegde
Sulfasalzine in the management of pure axial spondyloarthritis: Need to have a relook!
Indian Journal of Rheumatology
axial spondyloarthritis
cost effective
innovative strategies
sulphasalazine
title Sulfasalzine in the management of pure axial spondyloarthritis: Need to have a relook!
title_full Sulfasalzine in the management of pure axial spondyloarthritis: Need to have a relook!
title_fullStr Sulfasalzine in the management of pure axial spondyloarthritis: Need to have a relook!
title_full_unstemmed Sulfasalzine in the management of pure axial spondyloarthritis: Need to have a relook!
title_short Sulfasalzine in the management of pure axial spondyloarthritis: Need to have a relook!
title_sort sulfasalzine in the management of pure axial spondyloarthritis need to have a relook
topic axial spondyloarthritis
cost effective
innovative strategies
sulphasalazine
url http://www.indianjrheumatol.com/article.asp?issn=0973-3698;year=2020;volume=15;issue=5;spage=57;epage=63;aulast=Shankar
work_keys_str_mv AT subramanianshankar sulfasalzineinthemanagementofpureaxialspondyloarthritisneedtohavearelook
AT arunhegde sulfasalzineinthemanagementofpureaxialspondyloarthritisneedtohavearelook