Judging Expert Testimony: From Verbal Formalism to Practical Advice
Appraising the worth of others’ testimony is always complex; appraising the worth of expert testimony is even harder; appraising the worth of expert testimony in a legal context is harder yet. Legal efforts to assess the reliability of expert testimony—I’ll focus on evolving U.S. law governing the a...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | Susan Haack |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Universitat de Girona. Cátedra de Cultura Jurídica
2020-01-01
|
| Series: | Quaestio Facti |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://revistes.udg.edu/quaestio-facti/article/view/22312 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
On the Criteria for Evaluating an Expert's Opinion and Forensic Methods by Participants in the Legal Proceedings
by: P. Giverts, et al.
Published: (2022-04-01) -
The judicial assessment of expert evidence in Polish criminal procedure
by: Denis Solodov
Published: (2023-03-01) -
The Use of Expert Testimony and Results of Search Operations in the Criminal Process in Keeping with Decisions of the European Court of Human Right
by: Irina E. Nikitina
Published: (2017-06-01) -
Investigation of the Famous Theory of Testimony on Testimony
by: Seyed Jafar Alavi, et al.
Published: (2020-02-01) -
Reconsidering the Admissibility of Expert Forensic Evidence in South African Criminal Proceedings
by: Chevaure Du Pokoy
Published: (2025-05-01)