Benchmarking of snow water equivalent (SWE) products based on outcomes of the SnowPEx+ Intercomparison Project
<p>We assess and rank 23 gridded snow water equivalent (SWE) products by implementing a novel evaluation strategy using a new suite of reference data from two cross-validated sources and a series of product intercomparisons. The new reference data combine in situ measurements from both snow co...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Copernicus Publications
2025-01-01
|
| Series: | The Cryosphere |
| Online Access: | https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/19/201/2025/tc-19-201-2025.pdf |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1841525686453403648 |
|---|---|
| author | L. Mudryk C. Mortimer C. Derksen A. Elias Chereque P. Kushner |
| author_facet | L. Mudryk C. Mortimer C. Derksen A. Elias Chereque P. Kushner |
| author_sort | L. Mudryk |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | <p>We assess and rank 23 gridded snow water equivalent (SWE) products by implementing a novel evaluation strategy using a new suite of reference data from two cross-validated sources and a series of product intercomparisons. The new reference data combine in situ measurements from both snow courses and airborne gamma measurements. Compared to previous evaluations of gridded products, we have substantially increased the spatial coverage and sample size across North America, and we are able to evaluate product performance across both mountainous and nonmountainous regions. The evaluation strategy we use ranks overall relative product performance while still accounting for individual differences in the ability to represent SWE climatology, variability, and trends. Assessing these gridded products fills an important gap in the literature, since individual gridded products are frequently chosen without prior justification as the basis for evaluating land surface and climate model outputs, along with other climate applications. The top-performing product across the range of tests performed is ERA5-Land, followed by the Crocus snow model. Our evaluation indicates that the accurate representation of hemispheric SWE varies tremendously across the range of products. While most products are able to represent SWE reasonably well across Northern Hemisphere (NH) nonmountainous regions, the ability to accurately represent SWE in mountain regions and to accurately represent historical trends is much more variable. Finally, we demonstrate that, for the ensemble of products evaluated here, attempts to assimilate surface snow observations and/or satellite measurements lead to a deleterious influence on regional snow mass trends, which is an important consideration for how such gridded products are produced and applied in the future.</p> |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-29917321d7b94071b3784d0fa252b289 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 1994-0416 1994-0424 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-01-01 |
| publisher | Copernicus Publications |
| record_format | Article |
| series | The Cryosphere |
| spelling | doaj-art-29917321d7b94071b3784d0fa252b2892025-01-17T07:32:16ZengCopernicus PublicationsThe Cryosphere1994-04161994-04242025-01-011920121810.5194/tc-19-201-2025Benchmarking of snow water equivalent (SWE) products based on outcomes of the SnowPEx+ Intercomparison ProjectL. Mudryk0C. Mortimer1C. Derksen2A. Elias Chereque3P. Kushner4Climate Research Division, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Toronto, M3H 5T4, CanadaClimate Research Division, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Toronto, M3H 5T4, CanadaClimate Research Division, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Toronto, M3H 5T4, CanadaDepartment of Physics, University of Toronto, Toronto, M5S 1A7, CanadaDepartment of Physics, University of Toronto, Toronto, M5S 1A7, Canada<p>We assess and rank 23 gridded snow water equivalent (SWE) products by implementing a novel evaluation strategy using a new suite of reference data from two cross-validated sources and a series of product intercomparisons. The new reference data combine in situ measurements from both snow courses and airborne gamma measurements. Compared to previous evaluations of gridded products, we have substantially increased the spatial coverage and sample size across North America, and we are able to evaluate product performance across both mountainous and nonmountainous regions. The evaluation strategy we use ranks overall relative product performance while still accounting for individual differences in the ability to represent SWE climatology, variability, and trends. Assessing these gridded products fills an important gap in the literature, since individual gridded products are frequently chosen without prior justification as the basis for evaluating land surface and climate model outputs, along with other climate applications. The top-performing product across the range of tests performed is ERA5-Land, followed by the Crocus snow model. Our evaluation indicates that the accurate representation of hemispheric SWE varies tremendously across the range of products. While most products are able to represent SWE reasonably well across Northern Hemisphere (NH) nonmountainous regions, the ability to accurately represent SWE in mountain regions and to accurately represent historical trends is much more variable. Finally, we demonstrate that, for the ensemble of products evaluated here, attempts to assimilate surface snow observations and/or satellite measurements lead to a deleterious influence on regional snow mass trends, which is an important consideration for how such gridded products are produced and applied in the future.</p>https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/19/201/2025/tc-19-201-2025.pdf |
| spellingShingle | L. Mudryk C. Mortimer C. Derksen A. Elias Chereque P. Kushner Benchmarking of snow water equivalent (SWE) products based on outcomes of the SnowPEx+ Intercomparison Project The Cryosphere |
| title | Benchmarking of snow water equivalent (SWE) products based on outcomes of the SnowPEx+ Intercomparison Project |
| title_full | Benchmarking of snow water equivalent (SWE) products based on outcomes of the SnowPEx+ Intercomparison Project |
| title_fullStr | Benchmarking of snow water equivalent (SWE) products based on outcomes of the SnowPEx+ Intercomparison Project |
| title_full_unstemmed | Benchmarking of snow water equivalent (SWE) products based on outcomes of the SnowPEx+ Intercomparison Project |
| title_short | Benchmarking of snow water equivalent (SWE) products based on outcomes of the SnowPEx+ Intercomparison Project |
| title_sort | benchmarking of snow water equivalent swe products based on outcomes of the snowpex intercomparison project |
| url | https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/19/201/2025/tc-19-201-2025.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT lmudryk benchmarkingofsnowwaterequivalentsweproductsbasedonoutcomesofthesnowpexintercomparisonproject AT cmortimer benchmarkingofsnowwaterequivalentsweproductsbasedonoutcomesofthesnowpexintercomparisonproject AT cderksen benchmarkingofsnowwaterequivalentsweproductsbasedonoutcomesofthesnowpexintercomparisonproject AT aeliaschereque benchmarkingofsnowwaterequivalentsweproductsbasedonoutcomesofthesnowpexintercomparisonproject AT pkushner benchmarkingofsnowwaterequivalentsweproductsbasedonoutcomesofthesnowpexintercomparisonproject |