Comparative Evaluation of Cyclooxygenase Inhibition Profiles Across Various NSAID Forms and Doses: Implications for Efficacy and Adverse Effects

Abstract Introduction Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are commonly used for pain disorders and exert pharmacological effects by inhibiting cyclooxygenase (COX). Although previous studies have evaluated the COX inhibitory activity and selectivity of NSAIDs, none has compared COX inhibit...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kenshu Shirakawa, Masafumi Takeno, Hidekazu Kuma, Takaaki Terahara, Shigeki Yamaguchi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Adis, Springer Healthcare 2024-12-01
Series:Pain and Therapy
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1007/s40122-024-00687-2
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832586041517670400
author Kenshu Shirakawa
Masafumi Takeno
Hidekazu Kuma
Takaaki Terahara
Shigeki Yamaguchi
author_facet Kenshu Shirakawa
Masafumi Takeno
Hidekazu Kuma
Takaaki Terahara
Shigeki Yamaguchi
author_sort Kenshu Shirakawa
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Introduction Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are commonly used for pain disorders and exert pharmacological effects by inhibiting cyclooxygenase (COX). Although previous studies have evaluated the COX inhibitory activity and selectivity of NSAIDs, none has compared COX inhibitory concentrations with the plasma concentrations of clinical doses or investigated the efficacy and adverse effects of different dosage forms. Therefore, in this study we evaluated the COX inhibitory activities and inhibition rates of clinical doses of the various NSAID formulations, especially diclofenac sodium. Methods Human blood and the drug (diclofenac sodium, celecoxib, ibuprofen, flurbiprofen, or etodolac) were mixed and incubated, and the supernatant was collected and quantified the COX inhibitory activity of each drug by ELISA. Logistic regression analyses were used to calculate the inhibition rates at maximum plasma drug concentration (C max) of clinical doses of marketed formulations. For diclofenac sodium, we also calculated the concentrations at which COX inhibition rates were 50% and 80% (IC50 and IC80). Results COX-2 inhibition rate at C max of clinical doses exceeded 50% except celecoxib 100 mg. For diclofenac sodium, the C max at the clinical doses of the oral and suppository formulations showed almost complete inhibition of COX-2 and an inhibition rate exceeding IC80 for COX-1. The C max at repeated doses of the transdermal formulation showed an inhibition rate above IC80 for COX-2 but below IC80 for COX-1. Discussion This result explains why gastrointestinal disorders frequently occur with oral and suppository formulations of diclofenac sodium despite its relatively high COX-2 selectivity. Although the plasma drug concentration of the transdermal formulation is lower than oral and suppository formulations, it has an inhibition rate above IC50 for COX-2, which is required for analgesic efficacy, and has a lower COX-1 inhibition rate than these formulations. Conclusion The findings explain why the transdermal formulation exerts an analgesic effect despite having a lower C max than other diclofenac sodium formulations.
format Article
id doaj-art-2923c4570d484070a96606685a5f2bed
institution Kabale University
issn 2193-8237
2193-651X
language English
publishDate 2024-12-01
publisher Adis, Springer Healthcare
record_format Article
series Pain and Therapy
spelling doaj-art-2923c4570d484070a96606685a5f2bed2025-01-26T12:13:47ZengAdis, Springer HealthcarePain and Therapy2193-82372193-651X2024-12-0114132933810.1007/s40122-024-00687-2Comparative Evaluation of Cyclooxygenase Inhibition Profiles Across Various NSAID Forms and Doses: Implications for Efficacy and Adverse EffectsKenshu Shirakawa0Masafumi Takeno1Hidekazu Kuma2Takaaki Terahara3Shigeki Yamaguchi4Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Dokkyo Medical University School of MedicineHisamitsu Pharmaceutical Co., Inc.Hisamitsu Pharmaceutical Co., Inc.Hisamitsu Pharmaceutical Co., Inc.Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Dokkyo Medical University School of MedicineAbstract Introduction Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are commonly used for pain disorders and exert pharmacological effects by inhibiting cyclooxygenase (COX). Although previous studies have evaluated the COX inhibitory activity and selectivity of NSAIDs, none has compared COX inhibitory concentrations with the plasma concentrations of clinical doses or investigated the efficacy and adverse effects of different dosage forms. Therefore, in this study we evaluated the COX inhibitory activities and inhibition rates of clinical doses of the various NSAID formulations, especially diclofenac sodium. Methods Human blood and the drug (diclofenac sodium, celecoxib, ibuprofen, flurbiprofen, or etodolac) were mixed and incubated, and the supernatant was collected and quantified the COX inhibitory activity of each drug by ELISA. Logistic regression analyses were used to calculate the inhibition rates at maximum plasma drug concentration (C max) of clinical doses of marketed formulations. For diclofenac sodium, we also calculated the concentrations at which COX inhibition rates were 50% and 80% (IC50 and IC80). Results COX-2 inhibition rate at C max of clinical doses exceeded 50% except celecoxib 100 mg. For diclofenac sodium, the C max at the clinical doses of the oral and suppository formulations showed almost complete inhibition of COX-2 and an inhibition rate exceeding IC80 for COX-1. The C max at repeated doses of the transdermal formulation showed an inhibition rate above IC80 for COX-2 but below IC80 for COX-1. Discussion This result explains why gastrointestinal disorders frequently occur with oral and suppository formulations of diclofenac sodium despite its relatively high COX-2 selectivity. Although the plasma drug concentration of the transdermal formulation is lower than oral and suppository formulations, it has an inhibition rate above IC50 for COX-2, which is required for analgesic efficacy, and has a lower COX-1 inhibition rate than these formulations. Conclusion The findings explain why the transdermal formulation exerts an analgesic effect despite having a lower C max than other diclofenac sodium formulations.https://doi.org/10.1007/s40122-024-00687-2Diclofenac sodiumNSAIDCyclooxygenase (COX)Whole blood assay (WBA)Gastrointestinal disorders
spellingShingle Kenshu Shirakawa
Masafumi Takeno
Hidekazu Kuma
Takaaki Terahara
Shigeki Yamaguchi
Comparative Evaluation of Cyclooxygenase Inhibition Profiles Across Various NSAID Forms and Doses: Implications for Efficacy and Adverse Effects
Pain and Therapy
Diclofenac sodium
NSAID
Cyclooxygenase (COX)
Whole blood assay (WBA)
Gastrointestinal disorders
title Comparative Evaluation of Cyclooxygenase Inhibition Profiles Across Various NSAID Forms and Doses: Implications for Efficacy and Adverse Effects
title_full Comparative Evaluation of Cyclooxygenase Inhibition Profiles Across Various NSAID Forms and Doses: Implications for Efficacy and Adverse Effects
title_fullStr Comparative Evaluation of Cyclooxygenase Inhibition Profiles Across Various NSAID Forms and Doses: Implications for Efficacy and Adverse Effects
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Evaluation of Cyclooxygenase Inhibition Profiles Across Various NSAID Forms and Doses: Implications for Efficacy and Adverse Effects
title_short Comparative Evaluation of Cyclooxygenase Inhibition Profiles Across Various NSAID Forms and Doses: Implications for Efficacy and Adverse Effects
title_sort comparative evaluation of cyclooxygenase inhibition profiles across various nsaid forms and doses implications for efficacy and adverse effects
topic Diclofenac sodium
NSAID
Cyclooxygenase (COX)
Whole blood assay (WBA)
Gastrointestinal disorders
url https://doi.org/10.1007/s40122-024-00687-2
work_keys_str_mv AT kenshushirakawa comparativeevaluationofcyclooxygenaseinhibitionprofilesacrossvariousnsaidformsanddosesimplicationsforefficacyandadverseeffects
AT masafumitakeno comparativeevaluationofcyclooxygenaseinhibitionprofilesacrossvariousnsaidformsanddosesimplicationsforefficacyandadverseeffects
AT hidekazukuma comparativeevaluationofcyclooxygenaseinhibitionprofilesacrossvariousnsaidformsanddosesimplicationsforefficacyandadverseeffects
AT takaakiterahara comparativeevaluationofcyclooxygenaseinhibitionprofilesacrossvariousnsaidformsanddosesimplicationsforefficacyandadverseeffects
AT shigekiyamaguchi comparativeevaluationofcyclooxygenaseinhibitionprofilesacrossvariousnsaidformsanddosesimplicationsforefficacyandadverseeffects