Economic influences on trapper participation and per capita harvest of muskrat

ABSTRACT Muskrat (Ondatra zibethicus) populations in North America appear in decline in parts of their geographic range, prompting in‐depth investigations into population trends. However, long‐term data on muskrat population abundance are rare and managers often rely on harvest data to track relativ...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Adam A. Ahlers, Edward J. Heske, Craig A. Miller
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2016-09-01
Series:Wildlife Society Bulletin
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.696
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850064646240731136
author Adam A. Ahlers
Edward J. Heske
Craig A. Miller
author_facet Adam A. Ahlers
Edward J. Heske
Craig A. Miller
author_sort Adam A. Ahlers
collection DOAJ
description ABSTRACT Muskrat (Ondatra zibethicus) populations in North America appear in decline in parts of their geographic range, prompting in‐depth investigations into population trends. However, long‐term data on muskrat population abundance are rare and managers often rely on harvest data to track relative changes in population sizes. These data are likely biased by factors that influence trapper participation and effort and, if left unidentified and uncontrolled for, may provide misleading indices of muskrat abundance. Using 36 years (1976–2011) of detailed muskrat‐harvest information from Illinois, USA, we estimated the relative importance of economic factors to trapper participation and annual per capita muskrat harvest. As expected, annual muskrat harvest was positively correlated with the number of individuals participating in muskrat trapping. Participation in muskrat trapping was associated positively with pelt and gas prices and negatively with the unemployment rate during the trapping season (R2 = 0.76). Variance partitioning within our most‐supported model revealed that pelt prices, independent of gasoline prices and unemployment rates, was the most important predictor of muskrat trapper participation. Our only supported model of per capita muskrat harvest indicated that gasoline prices negatively influenced the number of muskrats harvested per trapper each year (r2 = 0.17). Remaining unexplained variation in this model may be due to factors affecting muskrat availability (e.g., muskrat abundance, access to good‐quality trapping areas) to trappers and may be useful for managers investigating population trends. We recommend that future investigations using muskrat harvest data, at minimum, statistically adjust for the strong positive effect of pelt prices. © 2016 The Wildlife Society.
format Article
id doaj-art-2909819cd0f04c7ca34b92f8ddda4a34
institution DOAJ
issn 2328-5540
language English
publishDate 2016-09-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Wildlife Society Bulletin
spelling doaj-art-2909819cd0f04c7ca34b92f8ddda4a342025-08-20T02:49:15ZengWileyWildlife Society Bulletin2328-55402016-09-0140354855310.1002/wsb.696Economic influences on trapper participation and per capita harvest of muskratAdam A. Ahlers0Edward J. Heske1Craig A. Miller2Department of Horticulture and Natural ResourcesKansas State UniversityManhattanKS66506USAIllinois Natural History SurveyPrairie Research InstituteChampaignIL61820USAIllinois Natural History SurveyPrairie Research InstituteChampaignIL61820USAABSTRACT Muskrat (Ondatra zibethicus) populations in North America appear in decline in parts of their geographic range, prompting in‐depth investigations into population trends. However, long‐term data on muskrat population abundance are rare and managers often rely on harvest data to track relative changes in population sizes. These data are likely biased by factors that influence trapper participation and effort and, if left unidentified and uncontrolled for, may provide misleading indices of muskrat abundance. Using 36 years (1976–2011) of detailed muskrat‐harvest information from Illinois, USA, we estimated the relative importance of economic factors to trapper participation and annual per capita muskrat harvest. As expected, annual muskrat harvest was positively correlated with the number of individuals participating in muskrat trapping. Participation in muskrat trapping was associated positively with pelt and gas prices and negatively with the unemployment rate during the trapping season (R2 = 0.76). Variance partitioning within our most‐supported model revealed that pelt prices, independent of gasoline prices and unemployment rates, was the most important predictor of muskrat trapper participation. Our only supported model of per capita muskrat harvest indicated that gasoline prices negatively influenced the number of muskrats harvested per trapper each year (r2 = 0.17). Remaining unexplained variation in this model may be due to factors affecting muskrat availability (e.g., muskrat abundance, access to good‐quality trapping areas) to trappers and may be useful for managers investigating population trends. We recommend that future investigations using muskrat harvest data, at minimum, statistically adjust for the strong positive effect of pelt prices. © 2016 The Wildlife Society.https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.696gasoline priceharvestIllinoismuskratOndatra zibethicuspelt price
spellingShingle Adam A. Ahlers
Edward J. Heske
Craig A. Miller
Economic influences on trapper participation and per capita harvest of muskrat
Wildlife Society Bulletin
gasoline price
harvest
Illinois
muskrat
Ondatra zibethicus
pelt price
title Economic influences on trapper participation and per capita harvest of muskrat
title_full Economic influences on trapper participation and per capita harvest of muskrat
title_fullStr Economic influences on trapper participation and per capita harvest of muskrat
title_full_unstemmed Economic influences on trapper participation and per capita harvest of muskrat
title_short Economic influences on trapper participation and per capita harvest of muskrat
title_sort economic influences on trapper participation and per capita harvest of muskrat
topic gasoline price
harvest
Illinois
muskrat
Ondatra zibethicus
pelt price
url https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.696
work_keys_str_mv AT adamaahlers economicinfluencesontrapperparticipationandpercapitaharvestofmuskrat
AT edwardjheske economicinfluencesontrapperparticipationandpercapitaharvestofmuskrat
AT craigamiller economicinfluencesontrapperparticipationandpercapitaharvestofmuskrat