L’argumentation éditoriale du Devoir sur la question nationale
This article identifies and compares the federalist position of former editor Claude Ryan of the Montreal newspaper Le Devoir with the independentist position of former editor Lise Bissonnette. An analysis of their editorials shows that their divergent positions did not stem from their respective vi...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | fra |
| Published: |
Université Laval
2012-01-01
|
| Series: | Communication |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://journals.openedition.org/communication/2759 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850125882012729344 |
|---|---|
| author | Gilles Gauthier |
| author_facet | Gilles Gauthier |
| author_sort | Gilles Gauthier |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | This article identifies and compares the federalist position of former editor Claude Ryan of the Montreal newspaper Le Devoir with the independentist position of former editor Lise Bissonnette. An analysis of their editorials shows that their divergent positions did not stem from their respective view on nationalism. Quite the contrary, both pass over in silence the question of Quebec nationalism and both their positions are rather in continuity with one another than in rupture. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-28d701948cc849918451f7834da2df14 |
| institution | OA Journals |
| issn | 1189-3788 1920-7344 |
| language | fra |
| publishDate | 2012-01-01 |
| publisher | Université Laval |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Communication |
| spelling | doaj-art-28d701948cc849918451f7834da2df142025-08-20T02:34:02ZfraUniversité LavalCommunication1189-37881920-73442012-01-0129210.4000/communication.2759L’argumentation éditoriale du Devoir sur la question nationaleGilles GauthierThis article identifies and compares the federalist position of former editor Claude Ryan of the Montreal newspaper Le Devoir with the independentist position of former editor Lise Bissonnette. An analysis of their editorials shows that their divergent positions did not stem from their respective view on nationalism. Quite the contrary, both pass over in silence the question of Quebec nationalism and both their positions are rather in continuity with one another than in rupture.https://journals.openedition.org/communication/2759Quebecnationalismfederalismsovereignismnational question |
| spellingShingle | Gilles Gauthier L’argumentation éditoriale du Devoir sur la question nationale Communication Quebec nationalism federalism sovereignism national question |
| title | L’argumentation éditoriale du Devoir sur la question nationale |
| title_full | L’argumentation éditoriale du Devoir sur la question nationale |
| title_fullStr | L’argumentation éditoriale du Devoir sur la question nationale |
| title_full_unstemmed | L’argumentation éditoriale du Devoir sur la question nationale |
| title_short | L’argumentation éditoriale du Devoir sur la question nationale |
| title_sort | l argumentation editoriale du devoir sur la question nationale |
| topic | Quebec nationalism federalism sovereignism national question |
| url | https://journals.openedition.org/communication/2759 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT gillesgauthier largumentationeditorialedudevoirsurlaquestionnationale |