Deer harvest variation in small and large management units in Pennsylvania
ABSTRACT Large game management units often lead to criticisms from hunters because they assume smaller units possess less variation in wildlife populations and more closely represent their local area. In 2003, Pennsylvania, USA, replaced smaller, socio‐political county‐based management units with la...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | Christopher S. Rosenberry, Duane R. Diefenbach |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wiley
2019-03-01
|
| Series: | Wildlife Society Bulletin |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.939 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Use of citizen advisory committees to direct deer management in Pennsylvania
by: Jeannine T. Fleegle, et al.
Published: (2013-03-01) -
White‐tailed deer age ratios as herd management and predator impact measures in pennsylvania
by: Christopher S. Rosenberry, et al.
Published: (2011-12-01) -
Factors influencing spatial heterogeneity of female white‐tailed deer harvest dynamics
by: Gabriel R. Karns, et al.
Published: (2016-12-01) -
Effects of restrictive harvest criteria on antler size of hunter‐harvested male white‐tailed deer and hunter opportunity
by: William D. Gulsby, et al.
Published: (2019-06-01) -
FACTORS SUPPRESSING A WILD TURKEY POPULATION IN SOUTHCENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA
by: Mary Jo Casalena, et al.
Published: (2005-01-01)