Evaluating the Efficacy of a Serious Game to Deliver Health Education About Invasive Meningococcal Disease: Clustered Randomized Controlled Equivalence Trial
BackgroundInvasive meningococcal disease (IMD) is a serious, vaccine-preventable infectious disease that can be life-threatening. Teaching adolescents about the early detection and prevention of IMD can be challenging in a school environment, with educators reporting they lac...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
JMIR Publications
2025-02-01
|
| Series: | JMIR Serious Games |
| Online Access: | https://games.jmir.org/2025/1/e60755 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1823858032817209344 |
|---|---|
| author | Lauren Bloomfield Julie Boston Martin Masek Lesley Andrew Donna Barwood Amanda Devine |
| author_facet | Lauren Bloomfield Julie Boston Martin Masek Lesley Andrew Donna Barwood Amanda Devine |
| author_sort | Lauren Bloomfield |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description |
BackgroundInvasive meningococcal disease (IMD) is a serious, vaccine-preventable infectious disease that can be life-threatening. Teaching adolescents about the early detection and prevention of IMD can be challenging in a school environment, with educators reporting they lack confidence or expertise to cover this in the classroom environment. Professional guest educators are an alternative to cover specialist topics such as IMD; however, time and resourcing constraints can mean that these educators are not always available. Serious games may be an alternative to face-to-face education, where complex health information may be delivered via self-directed gameplay.
ObjectiveThis study aims to develop a serious game that can replace a face-to-face educator in a classroom setting to educate adolescents aged 12 years to 15 years. This study evaluates the efficacy of the Meningococcal Immunisation Awareness, Prevention and Protection app (MIApp), a serious game designed to replicate the information provided in a 30-minute face-to-face presentation provided by a trained educator.
MethodsThis clustered, randomized controlled equivalence trial involved students (Years 7-10) from 6 secondary schools across metropolitan Western Australia who completed pre- and postintervention questionnaires with a follow-up at 3 months postintervention to measure the primary outcome of IMD knowledge acquisition following this self-guided intervention. The findings were compared with changes in an active control (comparison) group who received an in-class educational presentation about IMD transmission and protection. A questionnaire was developed to assess 9 key areas of knowledge. Median scores for knowledge pre- and postintervention were collected from a self-administered assessment of this questionnaire and, at 3 months postintervention, were compared between groups. A knowledge score of +/–2/16 was determined a priori to meet the criteria for equivalence. Participants who used MIApp were also asked a series of questions to assess the enjoyment of and engagement with the game.
ResultsOf the 788 participating students, the median postintervention correct score in both the MIApp and control cohorts was 14/16 (87.5% correct responses), compared with the median pre-intervention correct score of 6/16 (37.5% correct responses), representing a significant (P<.001) increase in IMD knowledge in both groups. Improvements were retained in both groups 3 months after the initial intervention (median correct score: 11/16 in the intervention group; 12/16 in the control group; P=.86), demonstrating the efficacy of MIApp to deliver health education about IMD transmission and protection, although response rates in the follow-up cohort were low (255/788, 32.4%).
ConclusionsMIApp met the predetermined threshold for equivalence, demonstrating similar improvements in knowledge posttrial and at the 3-month follow-up. Participating adolescents considered the MIApp game more enjoyable than a presentation, with equivalent improvements in knowledge. Serious games could represent a constructive tool to help teachers impart specialized health education. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-2887ed361f5b49b18f6d9d2f685b1b3c |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2291-9279 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-02-01 |
| publisher | JMIR Publications |
| record_format | Article |
| series | JMIR Serious Games |
| spelling | doaj-art-2887ed361f5b49b18f6d9d2f685b1b3c2025-02-11T16:00:54ZengJMIR PublicationsJMIR Serious Games2291-92792025-02-0113e6075510.2196/60755Evaluating the Efficacy of a Serious Game to Deliver Health Education About Invasive Meningococcal Disease: Clustered Randomized Controlled Equivalence TrialLauren Bloomfieldhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-5890-4254Julie Bostonhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-3892-6031Martin Masekhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-8620-6779Lesley Andrewhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-0344-4611Donna Barwoodhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-7447-6333Amanda Devinehttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-6978-6249 BackgroundInvasive meningococcal disease (IMD) is a serious, vaccine-preventable infectious disease that can be life-threatening. Teaching adolescents about the early detection and prevention of IMD can be challenging in a school environment, with educators reporting they lack confidence or expertise to cover this in the classroom environment. Professional guest educators are an alternative to cover specialist topics such as IMD; however, time and resourcing constraints can mean that these educators are not always available. Serious games may be an alternative to face-to-face education, where complex health information may be delivered via self-directed gameplay. ObjectiveThis study aims to develop a serious game that can replace a face-to-face educator in a classroom setting to educate adolescents aged 12 years to 15 years. This study evaluates the efficacy of the Meningococcal Immunisation Awareness, Prevention and Protection app (MIApp), a serious game designed to replicate the information provided in a 30-minute face-to-face presentation provided by a trained educator. MethodsThis clustered, randomized controlled equivalence trial involved students (Years 7-10) from 6 secondary schools across metropolitan Western Australia who completed pre- and postintervention questionnaires with a follow-up at 3 months postintervention to measure the primary outcome of IMD knowledge acquisition following this self-guided intervention. The findings were compared with changes in an active control (comparison) group who received an in-class educational presentation about IMD transmission and protection. A questionnaire was developed to assess 9 key areas of knowledge. Median scores for knowledge pre- and postintervention were collected from a self-administered assessment of this questionnaire and, at 3 months postintervention, were compared between groups. A knowledge score of +/–2/16 was determined a priori to meet the criteria for equivalence. Participants who used MIApp were also asked a series of questions to assess the enjoyment of and engagement with the game. ResultsOf the 788 participating students, the median postintervention correct score in both the MIApp and control cohorts was 14/16 (87.5% correct responses), compared with the median pre-intervention correct score of 6/16 (37.5% correct responses), representing a significant (P<.001) increase in IMD knowledge in both groups. Improvements were retained in both groups 3 months after the initial intervention (median correct score: 11/16 in the intervention group; 12/16 in the control group; P=.86), demonstrating the efficacy of MIApp to deliver health education about IMD transmission and protection, although response rates in the follow-up cohort were low (255/788, 32.4%). ConclusionsMIApp met the predetermined threshold for equivalence, demonstrating similar improvements in knowledge posttrial and at the 3-month follow-up. Participating adolescents considered the MIApp game more enjoyable than a presentation, with equivalent improvements in knowledge. Serious games could represent a constructive tool to help teachers impart specialized health education.https://games.jmir.org/2025/1/e60755 |
| spellingShingle | Lauren Bloomfield Julie Boston Martin Masek Lesley Andrew Donna Barwood Amanda Devine Evaluating the Efficacy of a Serious Game to Deliver Health Education About Invasive Meningococcal Disease: Clustered Randomized Controlled Equivalence Trial JMIR Serious Games |
| title | Evaluating the Efficacy of a Serious Game to Deliver Health Education About Invasive Meningococcal Disease: Clustered Randomized Controlled Equivalence Trial |
| title_full | Evaluating the Efficacy of a Serious Game to Deliver Health Education About Invasive Meningococcal Disease: Clustered Randomized Controlled Equivalence Trial |
| title_fullStr | Evaluating the Efficacy of a Serious Game to Deliver Health Education About Invasive Meningococcal Disease: Clustered Randomized Controlled Equivalence Trial |
| title_full_unstemmed | Evaluating the Efficacy of a Serious Game to Deliver Health Education About Invasive Meningococcal Disease: Clustered Randomized Controlled Equivalence Trial |
| title_short | Evaluating the Efficacy of a Serious Game to Deliver Health Education About Invasive Meningococcal Disease: Clustered Randomized Controlled Equivalence Trial |
| title_sort | evaluating the efficacy of a serious game to deliver health education about invasive meningococcal disease clustered randomized controlled equivalence trial |
| url | https://games.jmir.org/2025/1/e60755 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT laurenbloomfield evaluatingtheefficacyofaseriousgametodeliverhealtheducationaboutinvasivemeningococcaldiseaseclusteredrandomizedcontrolledequivalencetrial AT julieboston evaluatingtheefficacyofaseriousgametodeliverhealtheducationaboutinvasivemeningococcaldiseaseclusteredrandomizedcontrolledequivalencetrial AT martinmasek evaluatingtheefficacyofaseriousgametodeliverhealtheducationaboutinvasivemeningococcaldiseaseclusteredrandomizedcontrolledequivalencetrial AT lesleyandrew evaluatingtheefficacyofaseriousgametodeliverhealtheducationaboutinvasivemeningococcaldiseaseclusteredrandomizedcontrolledequivalencetrial AT donnabarwood evaluatingtheefficacyofaseriousgametodeliverhealtheducationaboutinvasivemeningococcaldiseaseclusteredrandomizedcontrolledequivalencetrial AT amandadevine evaluatingtheefficacyofaseriousgametodeliverhealtheducationaboutinvasivemeningococcaldiseaseclusteredrandomizedcontrolledequivalencetrial |