Treatment of Hallux Rigidus: Comparison of Hemiarthroplasty with Cartiva Implant, Allograft Interpositional Arthroplasty, and Arthrodesis

Background: A modern technique for the treatment of hallux rigidus (HR) is first metatarsophalangeal (MTP) hemiarthroplasty with the use of a Cartiva synthetic cartilage implant. Current scientific literature reporting early outcomes of the procedure is sparse and mixed, indicating the need for furt...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ryan Sanii MD, MPH, Kevin Phan MD, Drew Krumm MD, Daniel J. Patton MD, Tyler Madden MD, John G. Anderson MD, John D. Maskill MD, Donald R. Bohay MD, FACS, Michelle A. Padley PhD, Cameron G. Patthanacharoenphon MD
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2025-03-01
Series:Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/24730114251324184
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850209566770331648
author Ryan Sanii MD, MPH
Kevin Phan MD
Drew Krumm MD
Daniel J. Patton MD
Tyler Madden MD
John G. Anderson MD
John D. Maskill MD
Donald R. Bohay MD, FACS
Michelle A. Padley PhD
Cameron G. Patthanacharoenphon MD
author_facet Ryan Sanii MD, MPH
Kevin Phan MD
Drew Krumm MD
Daniel J. Patton MD
Tyler Madden MD
John G. Anderson MD
John D. Maskill MD
Donald R. Bohay MD, FACS
Michelle A. Padley PhD
Cameron G. Patthanacharoenphon MD
author_sort Ryan Sanii MD, MPH
collection DOAJ
description Background: A modern technique for the treatment of hallux rigidus (HR) is first metatarsophalangeal (MTP) hemiarthroplasty with the use of a Cartiva synthetic cartilage implant. Current scientific literature reporting early outcomes of the procedure is sparse and mixed, indicating the need for further analysis. The objective of this study was to compare improvement in visual analog scale (VAS) scores with first MTP hemiarthroplasty with Cartiva implant (HI), allograft interposition arthroplasty (IA), and arthrodesis (A) in patients who failed conservative management or cheilectomy. Methods: A retrospective cohort study of 99 patients was performed. There were 49 patients in the HI group, 25 patients in the IA group, and 25 patients in the A group. A follow-up survey was administered from which updated VAS and updated American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society scores were obtained. Results: Mean VAS scores improved by 2.73 (SD ± 2.80) points in the HI group, 4.16 (SD ± 2.01) points in the IA group, and 4.36 (SD ± 3.67) points in the A group ( P  = .035). Mean AOFAS scores improved by 14.90 (SD ± 17.31) points in the HI group, 27.80 (SD ± 15.22) points in the IA group, and 27.88 (SD ± 25.34) points in the A group ( P  = .005). There were 3 (6.1%) revision surgeries in the HI group, 2 (8.0%) revision surgeries in the A group, and no revision surgeries in the IA group ( P  = .59). Within the HI group, all 3 revisions were due to pain associated with the implant and were revised to MTP arthrodesis. The A group had 1 revision due to broken hardware and 1 revision due to infection. In both cases, the patients were treated with hardware removal. Conclusion: Pain and function may be slightly more improved with interpositional arthroplasty and arthrodesis for the treatment of HR, when compared to hemiarthroplasty with the Cartiva implant. Level of Evidence: Level III, therapeutic studies; case-control study.
format Article
id doaj-art-286dccf0b76f40c398b342fa7925a7cc
institution OA Journals
issn 2473-0114
language English
publishDate 2025-03-01
publisher SAGE Publishing
record_format Article
series Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics
spelling doaj-art-286dccf0b76f40c398b342fa7925a7cc2025-08-20T02:09:59ZengSAGE PublishingFoot & Ankle Orthopaedics2473-01142025-03-011010.1177/24730114251324184Treatment of Hallux Rigidus: Comparison of Hemiarthroplasty with Cartiva Implant, Allograft Interpositional Arthroplasty, and ArthrodesisRyan Sanii MD, MPH0Kevin Phan MD1Drew Krumm MD2Daniel J. Patton MD3Tyler Madden MD4John G. Anderson MD5John D. Maskill MD6Donald R. Bohay MD, FACS7Michelle A. Padley PhD8Cameron G. Patthanacharoenphon MD9The University of Chicago Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chicago, IL, USAOrthopedic Associates of Michigan, Grand Rapids, MI, USACorewell Health/Michigan State University College of Human Medicine, Grand Rapids, MI, USAOrthopedic Associates of Michigan, Grand Rapids, MI, USACorewell Health/Michigan State University College of Human Medicine, Grand Rapids, MI, USAOrthopedic Associates of Michigan, Grand Rapids, MI, USAOrthopedic Associates of Michigan, Grand Rapids, MI, USAOrthopedic Associates of Michigan, Grand Rapids, MI, USAOrthopedic Associates of Michigan, Grand Rapids, MI, USATrinity Health IHA Medical Group, Byron Center, MI, USABackground: A modern technique for the treatment of hallux rigidus (HR) is first metatarsophalangeal (MTP) hemiarthroplasty with the use of a Cartiva synthetic cartilage implant. Current scientific literature reporting early outcomes of the procedure is sparse and mixed, indicating the need for further analysis. The objective of this study was to compare improvement in visual analog scale (VAS) scores with first MTP hemiarthroplasty with Cartiva implant (HI), allograft interposition arthroplasty (IA), and arthrodesis (A) in patients who failed conservative management or cheilectomy. Methods: A retrospective cohort study of 99 patients was performed. There were 49 patients in the HI group, 25 patients in the IA group, and 25 patients in the A group. A follow-up survey was administered from which updated VAS and updated American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society scores were obtained. Results: Mean VAS scores improved by 2.73 (SD ± 2.80) points in the HI group, 4.16 (SD ± 2.01) points in the IA group, and 4.36 (SD ± 3.67) points in the A group ( P  = .035). Mean AOFAS scores improved by 14.90 (SD ± 17.31) points in the HI group, 27.80 (SD ± 15.22) points in the IA group, and 27.88 (SD ± 25.34) points in the A group ( P  = .005). There were 3 (6.1%) revision surgeries in the HI group, 2 (8.0%) revision surgeries in the A group, and no revision surgeries in the IA group ( P  = .59). Within the HI group, all 3 revisions were due to pain associated with the implant and were revised to MTP arthrodesis. The A group had 1 revision due to broken hardware and 1 revision due to infection. In both cases, the patients were treated with hardware removal. Conclusion: Pain and function may be slightly more improved with interpositional arthroplasty and arthrodesis for the treatment of HR, when compared to hemiarthroplasty with the Cartiva implant. Level of Evidence: Level III, therapeutic studies; case-control study.https://doi.org/10.1177/24730114251324184
spellingShingle Ryan Sanii MD, MPH
Kevin Phan MD
Drew Krumm MD
Daniel J. Patton MD
Tyler Madden MD
John G. Anderson MD
John D. Maskill MD
Donald R. Bohay MD, FACS
Michelle A. Padley PhD
Cameron G. Patthanacharoenphon MD
Treatment of Hallux Rigidus: Comparison of Hemiarthroplasty with Cartiva Implant, Allograft Interpositional Arthroplasty, and Arthrodesis
Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics
title Treatment of Hallux Rigidus: Comparison of Hemiarthroplasty with Cartiva Implant, Allograft Interpositional Arthroplasty, and Arthrodesis
title_full Treatment of Hallux Rigidus: Comparison of Hemiarthroplasty with Cartiva Implant, Allograft Interpositional Arthroplasty, and Arthrodesis
title_fullStr Treatment of Hallux Rigidus: Comparison of Hemiarthroplasty with Cartiva Implant, Allograft Interpositional Arthroplasty, and Arthrodesis
title_full_unstemmed Treatment of Hallux Rigidus: Comparison of Hemiarthroplasty with Cartiva Implant, Allograft Interpositional Arthroplasty, and Arthrodesis
title_short Treatment of Hallux Rigidus: Comparison of Hemiarthroplasty with Cartiva Implant, Allograft Interpositional Arthroplasty, and Arthrodesis
title_sort treatment of hallux rigidus comparison of hemiarthroplasty with cartiva implant allograft interpositional arthroplasty and arthrodesis
url https://doi.org/10.1177/24730114251324184
work_keys_str_mv AT ryansaniimdmph treatmentofhalluxrigiduscomparisonofhemiarthroplastywithcartivaimplantallograftinterpositionalarthroplastyandarthrodesis
AT kevinphanmd treatmentofhalluxrigiduscomparisonofhemiarthroplastywithcartivaimplantallograftinterpositionalarthroplastyandarthrodesis
AT drewkrummmd treatmentofhalluxrigiduscomparisonofhemiarthroplastywithcartivaimplantallograftinterpositionalarthroplastyandarthrodesis
AT danieljpattonmd treatmentofhalluxrigiduscomparisonofhemiarthroplastywithcartivaimplantallograftinterpositionalarthroplastyandarthrodesis
AT tylermaddenmd treatmentofhalluxrigiduscomparisonofhemiarthroplastywithcartivaimplantallograftinterpositionalarthroplastyandarthrodesis
AT johngandersonmd treatmentofhalluxrigiduscomparisonofhemiarthroplastywithcartivaimplantallograftinterpositionalarthroplastyandarthrodesis
AT johndmaskillmd treatmentofhalluxrigiduscomparisonofhemiarthroplastywithcartivaimplantallograftinterpositionalarthroplastyandarthrodesis
AT donaldrbohaymdfacs treatmentofhalluxrigiduscomparisonofhemiarthroplastywithcartivaimplantallograftinterpositionalarthroplastyandarthrodesis
AT michelleapadleyphd treatmentofhalluxrigiduscomparisonofhemiarthroplastywithcartivaimplantallograftinterpositionalarthroplastyandarthrodesis
AT camerongpatthanacharoenphonmd treatmentofhalluxrigiduscomparisonofhemiarthroplastywithcartivaimplantallograftinterpositionalarthroplastyandarthrodesis