Epistemic Injustice in the Criminal Trial
Jasmine Gonzales Rose, Rachel Herdy, Tareeq Jalloh and Abenaa Owusu-Bempah have each written a paper commenting on my essay ‘Evidential Reasoning, Testimonial Injustice and the Fairness of the Criminal Trial’, which appeared in Quaestio Facti in 2024. In this reply I engage with their insightful wo...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | Federico Picinali |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Universitat de Girona. Cátedra de Cultura Jurídica
2025-01-01
|
| Series: | Quaestio Facti |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://revistes.udg.edu/quaestio-facti/article/view/23098 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Evidential reasoning, testimonial injustice and the fairness of the criminal trial
by: Federico Picinali
Published: (2023-09-01) -
Understanding and preventing testimonial injustice in criminal proceedings
by: Abenaa Owusu-Bempah
Published: (2024-06-01) -
A Critical Perspective on Testimonial Injustice: Interrogating Witnesses' Credibility Excess in Criminal Trials
by: Jasmine Gonzales Rose
Published: (2024-06-01) -
Epistemic injustices and curriculum: Strategizing for justice
by: Yogendra Babu, et al.
Published: (2025-01-01) -
Editorial of dossier “Epistemic Injustice in Criminal Procedure”
by: Andrés Páez, et al.
Published: (2023-03-01)