Conceptual design and process assessment of a MSW waste-to-energy plant with oxy-combustion CO2 capture

Capturing CO2 from waste to energy plants has attracted increasing interest, particularly for the goal of achieving negative emissions. Oxy-combustion is a competitive alternative technology for CO2 capture. The main challenge is that oxygen production is expensive. In addition, a subsequent purific...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chao Fu, Mario Ditaranto, Michaël Becidan, David Berstad, Johnny Stuen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2025-12-01
Series:Carbon Management
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/17583004.2025.2473913
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Capturing CO2 from waste to energy plants has attracted increasing interest, particularly for the goal of achieving negative emissions. Oxy-combustion is a competitive alternative technology for CO2 capture. The main challenge is that oxygen production is expensive. In addition, a subsequent purification process is normally required to removal impurities, such as N2, O2, and Ar from CO2. This study presents a conceptual design of an oxy-combustion waste to energy plant with CO2 capture. A negative emission of 510.6 kg CO2/ton municipal solid waste has been achieved. The study further assesses the influences of air leakage, oxygen content at the furnace outlet, and purity of O2 supplied on the energy performance. It is concluded that efforts should be primarily made to reduce the impurities levels by minimizing air leakage and reducing oxygen content at furnace outlet when the impurities are high. In case of low air leakage and low oxygen content, efforts should be primarily made to reduce the power consumption of air separation units since it dominates the total power consumption. When compared to a reference monoethanolamine capture process, oxy-combustionhas a much lower specific primary energy consumption for CO2 avoided (SPECCA) of 2.73 vs. 7.8 MJLHV/kgCO2 for the monoethanolamine capture.
ISSN:1758-3004
1758-3012