Does outsourcing enable the survival of good care homes? A longitudinal analysis of all care homes in England, 2011–2023

Background It is unclear whether outsourcing has enabled the growth and survival of the best care homes, as intended. We aimed to test whether ownership (for-profit, public and third sector (non-profit)) influences determinants of closure among all care homes in England, 2011–2023.Methods We created...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Anders Malthe Bach-Mortensen, Michelle Degli Esposti, Benjamin Goodair
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMJ Publishing Group 2024-08-01
Series:BMJ Public Health
Online Access:https://bmjpublichealth.bmj.com/content/2/2/e001227.full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832539880032305152
author Anders Malthe Bach-Mortensen
Michelle Degli Esposti
Benjamin Goodair
author_facet Anders Malthe Bach-Mortensen
Michelle Degli Esposti
Benjamin Goodair
author_sort Anders Malthe Bach-Mortensen
collection DOAJ
description Background It is unclear whether outsourcing has enabled the growth and survival of the best care homes, as intended. We aimed to test whether ownership (for-profit, public and third sector (non-profit)) influences determinants of closure among all care homes in England, 2011–2023.Methods We created a dataset of all care homes from 2011 to 2023 (29 548 care homes and 8346 closures) and Care Quality Commission inspections from 2014 to 2023 (n=65 726). Using logistic regression, we investigated determinants of care home closures including care home characteristics (eg, number of beds), service registrations (eg, dementia and nursing), quality (inspection ratings) and area deprivation. We then tested for interaction effects; specifically exploring (1) whether the determinants of closure vary by ownership and (2) whether quality differences between active and closed for-profit and third sector/public homes vary by area deprivation.Results The prevalence of for-profit care homes increased from 2011 to 2023. Ownership was a key determinant of care home closure; public and third sector care homes were almost twice as likely to close than for-profit providers (OR 1.8; 95% CI 1.44 to 2.24, p<0.001 and OR 1.6; 95% CI 1.37 to 1.76, p<0.001, respectively). Although care quality was also a significant determinant of closure, this association varied by care home ownership. For example, public and third sector homes rated ‘good’ were 7.6 percentage points (p<0.001) and 5.9 percentage points (p<0.001) more likely to close than for-profit homes with the same rating. Lastly, the quality of for-profit homes is heavily influenced by area deprivation, and the best active homes in deprived areas are operated by public and third sector providers.Conclusion Our findings suggest that outsourcing of care services has not promoted the survival of the best care homes and may have adverse effects on the equity and accessibility of care. This calls for a reassessment of current policies to ensure that vulnerable populations have continued access to adequate quality of care.
format Article
id doaj-art-27e6d32f2edc4efe8c1f06a1aba9e17c
institution Kabale University
issn 2753-4294
language English
publishDate 2024-08-01
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format Article
series BMJ Public Health
spelling doaj-art-27e6d32f2edc4efe8c1f06a1aba9e17c2025-02-05T07:55:09ZengBMJ Publishing GroupBMJ Public Health2753-42942024-08-012210.1136/bmjph-2024-001227Does outsourcing enable the survival of good care homes? A longitudinal analysis of all care homes in England, 2011–2023Anders Malthe Bach-Mortensen0Michelle Degli Esposti1Benjamin Goodair2Social Policy and Intervention, University of Oxford, Oxford, UKDepartment of Social Policy and Intervention, University of Oxford, Oxford, UKpostdoctoral researcherBackground It is unclear whether outsourcing has enabled the growth and survival of the best care homes, as intended. We aimed to test whether ownership (for-profit, public and third sector (non-profit)) influences determinants of closure among all care homes in England, 2011–2023.Methods We created a dataset of all care homes from 2011 to 2023 (29 548 care homes and 8346 closures) and Care Quality Commission inspections from 2014 to 2023 (n=65 726). Using logistic regression, we investigated determinants of care home closures including care home characteristics (eg, number of beds), service registrations (eg, dementia and nursing), quality (inspection ratings) and area deprivation. We then tested for interaction effects; specifically exploring (1) whether the determinants of closure vary by ownership and (2) whether quality differences between active and closed for-profit and third sector/public homes vary by area deprivation.Results The prevalence of for-profit care homes increased from 2011 to 2023. Ownership was a key determinant of care home closure; public and third sector care homes were almost twice as likely to close than for-profit providers (OR 1.8; 95% CI 1.44 to 2.24, p<0.001 and OR 1.6; 95% CI 1.37 to 1.76, p<0.001, respectively). Although care quality was also a significant determinant of closure, this association varied by care home ownership. For example, public and third sector homes rated ‘good’ were 7.6 percentage points (p<0.001) and 5.9 percentage points (p<0.001) more likely to close than for-profit homes with the same rating. Lastly, the quality of for-profit homes is heavily influenced by area deprivation, and the best active homes in deprived areas are operated by public and third sector providers.Conclusion Our findings suggest that outsourcing of care services has not promoted the survival of the best care homes and may have adverse effects on the equity and accessibility of care. This calls for a reassessment of current policies to ensure that vulnerable populations have continued access to adequate quality of care.https://bmjpublichealth.bmj.com/content/2/2/e001227.full
spellingShingle Anders Malthe Bach-Mortensen
Michelle Degli Esposti
Benjamin Goodair
Does outsourcing enable the survival of good care homes? A longitudinal analysis of all care homes in England, 2011–2023
BMJ Public Health
title Does outsourcing enable the survival of good care homes? A longitudinal analysis of all care homes in England, 2011–2023
title_full Does outsourcing enable the survival of good care homes? A longitudinal analysis of all care homes in England, 2011–2023
title_fullStr Does outsourcing enable the survival of good care homes? A longitudinal analysis of all care homes in England, 2011–2023
title_full_unstemmed Does outsourcing enable the survival of good care homes? A longitudinal analysis of all care homes in England, 2011–2023
title_short Does outsourcing enable the survival of good care homes? A longitudinal analysis of all care homes in England, 2011–2023
title_sort does outsourcing enable the survival of good care homes a longitudinal analysis of all care homes in england 2011 2023
url https://bmjpublichealth.bmj.com/content/2/2/e001227.full
work_keys_str_mv AT andersmalthebachmortensen doesoutsourcingenablethesurvivalofgoodcarehomesalongitudinalanalysisofallcarehomesinengland20112023
AT michelledegliesposti doesoutsourcingenablethesurvivalofgoodcarehomesalongitudinalanalysisofallcarehomesinengland20112023
AT benjamingoodair doesoutsourcingenablethesurvivalofgoodcarehomesalongitudinalanalysisofallcarehomesinengland20112023