Comparative Analysis of Islet Auto-Transplantation Outcome Classification Systems: Evaluating Concordance, Feasibility, and a Data-Driven Approach

A standardized approach to assessing islet autotransplantation outcomes is crucial for evaluating graft function and guiding clinical decisions. This study compares the performance of existing classification systems—Milan, Minneapolis, Chicago, Leicester, Igls, and a novel Data-Driven approach—by ev...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Davide Catarinella, Paola Magistretti, Raffaella Melzi, Alessia Mercalli, Stefano Tentori, Chiara Gremizzi, Vera Paloschi, Simona Sala, Libera Valla, Francesca Aleotti, Sabrina Costa, Francesco De Cobelli, Rossana Caldara, Lorenzo Piemonti
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2025-07-01
Series:Transplant International
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontierspartnerships.org/articles/10.3389/ti.2025.14714/full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849317561515114496
author Davide Catarinella
Paola Magistretti
Raffaella Melzi
Alessia Mercalli
Stefano Tentori
Chiara Gremizzi
Vera Paloschi
Simona Sala
Libera Valla
Francesca Aleotti
Sabrina Costa
Francesco De Cobelli
Francesco De Cobelli
Rossana Caldara
Lorenzo Piemonti
Lorenzo Piemonti
author_facet Davide Catarinella
Paola Magistretti
Raffaella Melzi
Alessia Mercalli
Stefano Tentori
Chiara Gremizzi
Vera Paloschi
Simona Sala
Libera Valla
Francesca Aleotti
Sabrina Costa
Francesco De Cobelli
Francesco De Cobelli
Rossana Caldara
Lorenzo Piemonti
Lorenzo Piemonti
author_sort Davide Catarinella
collection DOAJ
description A standardized approach to assessing islet autotransplantation outcomes is crucial for evaluating graft function and guiding clinical decisions. This study compares the performance of existing classification systems—Milan, Minneapolis, Chicago, Leicester, Igls, and a novel Data-Driven approach—by evaluating their ability to differentiate transplant outcomes using metabolic and insulin secretion parameters. Our analysis shows strong concordance among Milan, Minneapolis, Chicago, and Igls, primarily due to minor variations in C-peptide thresholds. The Leicester and Data-Driven systems, however, exhibit greater divergence, with the Leicester system simplifying assessment by excluding severe hypoglycemic events and HbA1c, and the Data-Driven approach offering a more dynamic framework without predefined thresholds. Fasting C-peptide levels emerged as a highly reliable predictor of graft function, with the arginine test proving more effective than Mixed Meal Tolerance Test for additional evaluation. The Data-Driven approach provided superior stratification of outcomes, highlighting the importance of residual insulin secretion in metabolic control. These findings suggest that refining classification systems, particularly by considering insulin sensitivity and residual secretion, could enhance long-term patient monitoring and improve our understanding of beta-cell replacement therapies. Further validation across diverse cohorts is essential for broader clinical adoption.
format Article
id doaj-art-27d1c96a0fc3485fa43bf97f7a05c831
institution Kabale University
issn 1432-2277
language English
publishDate 2025-07-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Transplant International
spelling doaj-art-27d1c96a0fc3485fa43bf97f7a05c8312025-08-20T03:51:09ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Transplant International1432-22772025-07-013810.3389/ti.2025.1471414714Comparative Analysis of Islet Auto-Transplantation Outcome Classification Systems: Evaluating Concordance, Feasibility, and a Data-Driven ApproachDavide Catarinella0Paola Magistretti1Raffaella Melzi2Alessia Mercalli3Stefano Tentori4Chiara Gremizzi5Vera Paloschi6Simona Sala7Libera Valla8Francesca Aleotti9Sabrina Costa10Francesco De Cobelli11Francesco De Cobelli12Rossana Caldara13Lorenzo Piemonti14Lorenzo Piemonti15Clinic Unit of Regenerative Medicine and Organ Transplants, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, ItalyDiabetes Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, ItalyDiabetes Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, ItalyDiabetes Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, ItalyClinic Unit of Regenerative Medicine and Organ Transplants, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, ItalyClinic Unit of Regenerative Medicine and Organ Transplants, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, ItalyClinic Unit of Regenerative Medicine and Organ Transplants, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, ItalyClinic Unit of Regenerative Medicine and Organ Transplants, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, ItalyDiabetes Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, ItalyPancreatic Surgery, Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Center, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, ItalyDiabetes Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, ItalyDepartment of Radiology, Experimental Imaging Center, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, ItalyUniversità Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, ItalyClinic Unit of Regenerative Medicine and Organ Transplants, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, ItalyClinic Unit of Regenerative Medicine and Organ Transplants, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, ItalyUniversità Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, ItalyA standardized approach to assessing islet autotransplantation outcomes is crucial for evaluating graft function and guiding clinical decisions. This study compares the performance of existing classification systems—Milan, Minneapolis, Chicago, Leicester, Igls, and a novel Data-Driven approach—by evaluating their ability to differentiate transplant outcomes using metabolic and insulin secretion parameters. Our analysis shows strong concordance among Milan, Minneapolis, Chicago, and Igls, primarily due to minor variations in C-peptide thresholds. The Leicester and Data-Driven systems, however, exhibit greater divergence, with the Leicester system simplifying assessment by excluding severe hypoglycemic events and HbA1c, and the Data-Driven approach offering a more dynamic framework without predefined thresholds. Fasting C-peptide levels emerged as a highly reliable predictor of graft function, with the arginine test proving more effective than Mixed Meal Tolerance Test for additional evaluation. The Data-Driven approach provided superior stratification of outcomes, highlighting the importance of residual insulin secretion in metabolic control. These findings suggest that refining classification systems, particularly by considering insulin sensitivity and residual secretion, could enhance long-term patient monitoring and improve our understanding of beta-cell replacement therapies. Further validation across diverse cohorts is essential for broader clinical adoption.https://www.frontierspartnerships.org/articles/10.3389/ti.2025.14714/fullislet autotransplantationgraft functionclassification systemsC-peptideinsulin secretion
spellingShingle Davide Catarinella
Paola Magistretti
Raffaella Melzi
Alessia Mercalli
Stefano Tentori
Chiara Gremizzi
Vera Paloschi
Simona Sala
Libera Valla
Francesca Aleotti
Sabrina Costa
Francesco De Cobelli
Francesco De Cobelli
Rossana Caldara
Lorenzo Piemonti
Lorenzo Piemonti
Comparative Analysis of Islet Auto-Transplantation Outcome Classification Systems: Evaluating Concordance, Feasibility, and a Data-Driven Approach
Transplant International
islet autotransplantation
graft function
classification systems
C-peptide
insulin secretion
title Comparative Analysis of Islet Auto-Transplantation Outcome Classification Systems: Evaluating Concordance, Feasibility, and a Data-Driven Approach
title_full Comparative Analysis of Islet Auto-Transplantation Outcome Classification Systems: Evaluating Concordance, Feasibility, and a Data-Driven Approach
title_fullStr Comparative Analysis of Islet Auto-Transplantation Outcome Classification Systems: Evaluating Concordance, Feasibility, and a Data-Driven Approach
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Analysis of Islet Auto-Transplantation Outcome Classification Systems: Evaluating Concordance, Feasibility, and a Data-Driven Approach
title_short Comparative Analysis of Islet Auto-Transplantation Outcome Classification Systems: Evaluating Concordance, Feasibility, and a Data-Driven Approach
title_sort comparative analysis of islet auto transplantation outcome classification systems evaluating concordance feasibility and a data driven approach
topic islet autotransplantation
graft function
classification systems
C-peptide
insulin secretion
url https://www.frontierspartnerships.org/articles/10.3389/ti.2025.14714/full
work_keys_str_mv AT davidecatarinella comparativeanalysisofisletautotransplantationoutcomeclassificationsystemsevaluatingconcordancefeasibilityandadatadrivenapproach
AT paolamagistretti comparativeanalysisofisletautotransplantationoutcomeclassificationsystemsevaluatingconcordancefeasibilityandadatadrivenapproach
AT raffaellamelzi comparativeanalysisofisletautotransplantationoutcomeclassificationsystemsevaluatingconcordancefeasibilityandadatadrivenapproach
AT alessiamercalli comparativeanalysisofisletautotransplantationoutcomeclassificationsystemsevaluatingconcordancefeasibilityandadatadrivenapproach
AT stefanotentori comparativeanalysisofisletautotransplantationoutcomeclassificationsystemsevaluatingconcordancefeasibilityandadatadrivenapproach
AT chiaragremizzi comparativeanalysisofisletautotransplantationoutcomeclassificationsystemsevaluatingconcordancefeasibilityandadatadrivenapproach
AT verapaloschi comparativeanalysisofisletautotransplantationoutcomeclassificationsystemsevaluatingconcordancefeasibilityandadatadrivenapproach
AT simonasala comparativeanalysisofisletautotransplantationoutcomeclassificationsystemsevaluatingconcordancefeasibilityandadatadrivenapproach
AT liberavalla comparativeanalysisofisletautotransplantationoutcomeclassificationsystemsevaluatingconcordancefeasibilityandadatadrivenapproach
AT francescaaleotti comparativeanalysisofisletautotransplantationoutcomeclassificationsystemsevaluatingconcordancefeasibilityandadatadrivenapproach
AT sabrinacosta comparativeanalysisofisletautotransplantationoutcomeclassificationsystemsevaluatingconcordancefeasibilityandadatadrivenapproach
AT francescodecobelli comparativeanalysisofisletautotransplantationoutcomeclassificationsystemsevaluatingconcordancefeasibilityandadatadrivenapproach
AT francescodecobelli comparativeanalysisofisletautotransplantationoutcomeclassificationsystemsevaluatingconcordancefeasibilityandadatadrivenapproach
AT rossanacaldara comparativeanalysisofisletautotransplantationoutcomeclassificationsystemsevaluatingconcordancefeasibilityandadatadrivenapproach
AT lorenzopiemonti comparativeanalysisofisletautotransplantationoutcomeclassificationsystemsevaluatingconcordancefeasibilityandadatadrivenapproach
AT lorenzopiemonti comparativeanalysisofisletautotransplantationoutcomeclassificationsystemsevaluatingconcordancefeasibilityandadatadrivenapproach