Evaluating a discretized data acquisition method for couch modeling to streamline the commissioning process of radiological instruments

Abstract Background The commissioning of radiotherapy treatment planning system (RTPS) involves many time-consuming tests to maintain consistency between actual and planned dose. As the number of new technologies and peripheral devices increases year by year, there is a need for time-efficient and a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Syouta Tomimoto, Yusuke Saeki, Okihiro Motoda, Masato Tanaka, Syouki Tsumoto, Hana Nishikawa, Yuki Miyashima, Makiko Higuchi, Tadashi Tani, Kuniaki Katsui, Yoshinori Tanabe
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2025-05-01
Series:The Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s43055-025-01479-0
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849704724993933312
author Syouta Tomimoto
Yusuke Saeki
Okihiro Motoda
Masato Tanaka
Syouki Tsumoto
Hana Nishikawa
Yuki Miyashima
Makiko Higuchi
Tadashi Tani
Kuniaki Katsui
Yoshinori Tanabe
author_facet Syouta Tomimoto
Yusuke Saeki
Okihiro Motoda
Masato Tanaka
Syouki Tsumoto
Hana Nishikawa
Yuki Miyashima
Makiko Higuchi
Tadashi Tani
Kuniaki Katsui
Yoshinori Tanabe
author_sort Syouta Tomimoto
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background The commissioning of radiotherapy treatment planning system (RTPS) involves many time-consuming tests to maintain consistency between actual and planned dose. As the number of new technologies and peripheral devices increases year by year, there is a need for time-efficient and accurate commissioning of radiation therapy equipment. Couch modeling is one type of commissioning, and there are no recommended values for CT due to differences in equipment calibration between facilities. This study evaluated the optimal electron density (ED) for the couch using discretized gantry angles. Results All discrete-angle groups showed a high correlation between the surface ED and dose difference between the actual and planned doses (|r|> 0.9). AcurosXB did not demonstrate a significant correlation between dose differences and each energy. For a small number of discretized gantry groups, the optimal couch modeling results revealed several combinations of surface and interior ED with the same score. Upon adding all couch thickness scores, all energy scores, and both algorithm scores, the optimal surface and interior EDs with the highest score across all couch thicknesses were 0.4 and 0.07, respectively. Conclusions The optimal couch surface ED dose difference trend was identified, and the effectiveness indicated using the dose difference score from discrete-angle couch modeling. Using this method, couch modeling can be evaluated in a highly precise and quick manner, which helps in the commissioning of complicated linear accelerator and radiological treatment plans.
format Article
id doaj-art-27b527d73bd747a5ab78a9de9deb7974
institution DOAJ
issn 2090-4762
language English
publishDate 2025-05-01
publisher SpringerOpen
record_format Article
series The Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine
spelling doaj-art-27b527d73bd747a5ab78a9de9deb79742025-08-20T03:16:40ZengSpringerOpenThe Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine2090-47622025-05-0156111010.1186/s43055-025-01479-0Evaluating a discretized data acquisition method for couch modeling to streamline the commissioning process of radiological instrumentsSyouta Tomimoto0Yusuke Saeki1Okihiro Motoda2Masato Tanaka3Syouki Tsumoto4Hana Nishikawa5Yuki Miyashima6Makiko Higuchi7Tadashi Tani8Kuniaki Katsui9Yoshinori Tanabe10Department of Radiological Technology, Faculty of Medicine, Graduate School of Health Sciences, Okayama UniversityDepartment of Radiological Technology, Kawasaki Medical School HospitalDepartment of Radiological Technology, Kawasaki Medical School HospitalDepartment of Radiological Technology, Kawasaki Medical School HospitalDepartment of Radiological Technology, Faculty of Medicine, Graduate School of Health Sciences, Okayama UniversityDepartment of Radiological Technology, Faculty of Medicine, Graduate School of Health Sciences, Okayama UniversityDepartment of Radiological Technology, Kawasaki Medical School HospitalDepartment of Radiological Technology, Kawasaki Medical School HospitalDepartment of Radiological Technology, Kawasaki Medical School HospitalDepartment of Radiology, Kawasaki Medical SchoolDepartment of Radiological Technology, Faculty of Medicine, Graduate School of Health Sciences, Okayama UniversityAbstract Background The commissioning of radiotherapy treatment planning system (RTPS) involves many time-consuming tests to maintain consistency between actual and planned dose. As the number of new technologies and peripheral devices increases year by year, there is a need for time-efficient and accurate commissioning of radiation therapy equipment. Couch modeling is one type of commissioning, and there are no recommended values for CT due to differences in equipment calibration between facilities. This study evaluated the optimal electron density (ED) for the couch using discretized gantry angles. Results All discrete-angle groups showed a high correlation between the surface ED and dose difference between the actual and planned doses (|r|> 0.9). AcurosXB did not demonstrate a significant correlation between dose differences and each energy. For a small number of discretized gantry groups, the optimal couch modeling results revealed several combinations of surface and interior ED with the same score. Upon adding all couch thickness scores, all energy scores, and both algorithm scores, the optimal surface and interior EDs with the highest score across all couch thicknesses were 0.4 and 0.07, respectively. Conclusions The optimal couch surface ED dose difference trend was identified, and the effectiveness indicated using the dose difference score from discrete-angle couch modeling. Using this method, couch modeling can be evaluated in a highly precise and quick manner, which helps in the commissioning of complicated linear accelerator and radiological treatment plans.https://doi.org/10.1186/s43055-025-01479-0Couch modelingCommissioningAttenuation of couchLinear acceleratorRadiotherapy planning system
spellingShingle Syouta Tomimoto
Yusuke Saeki
Okihiro Motoda
Masato Tanaka
Syouki Tsumoto
Hana Nishikawa
Yuki Miyashima
Makiko Higuchi
Tadashi Tani
Kuniaki Katsui
Yoshinori Tanabe
Evaluating a discretized data acquisition method for couch modeling to streamline the commissioning process of radiological instruments
The Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine
Couch modeling
Commissioning
Attenuation of couch
Linear accelerator
Radiotherapy planning system
title Evaluating a discretized data acquisition method for couch modeling to streamline the commissioning process of radiological instruments
title_full Evaluating a discretized data acquisition method for couch modeling to streamline the commissioning process of radiological instruments
title_fullStr Evaluating a discretized data acquisition method for couch modeling to streamline the commissioning process of radiological instruments
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating a discretized data acquisition method for couch modeling to streamline the commissioning process of radiological instruments
title_short Evaluating a discretized data acquisition method for couch modeling to streamline the commissioning process of radiological instruments
title_sort evaluating a discretized data acquisition method for couch modeling to streamline the commissioning process of radiological instruments
topic Couch modeling
Commissioning
Attenuation of couch
Linear accelerator
Radiotherapy planning system
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s43055-025-01479-0
work_keys_str_mv AT syoutatomimoto evaluatingadiscretizeddataacquisitionmethodforcouchmodelingtostreamlinethecommissioningprocessofradiologicalinstruments
AT yusukesaeki evaluatingadiscretizeddataacquisitionmethodforcouchmodelingtostreamlinethecommissioningprocessofradiologicalinstruments
AT okihiromotoda evaluatingadiscretizeddataacquisitionmethodforcouchmodelingtostreamlinethecommissioningprocessofradiologicalinstruments
AT masatotanaka evaluatingadiscretizeddataacquisitionmethodforcouchmodelingtostreamlinethecommissioningprocessofradiologicalinstruments
AT syoukitsumoto evaluatingadiscretizeddataacquisitionmethodforcouchmodelingtostreamlinethecommissioningprocessofradiologicalinstruments
AT hananishikawa evaluatingadiscretizeddataacquisitionmethodforcouchmodelingtostreamlinethecommissioningprocessofradiologicalinstruments
AT yukimiyashima evaluatingadiscretizeddataacquisitionmethodforcouchmodelingtostreamlinethecommissioningprocessofradiologicalinstruments
AT makikohiguchi evaluatingadiscretizeddataacquisitionmethodforcouchmodelingtostreamlinethecommissioningprocessofradiologicalinstruments
AT tadashitani evaluatingadiscretizeddataacquisitionmethodforcouchmodelingtostreamlinethecommissioningprocessofradiologicalinstruments
AT kuniakikatsui evaluatingadiscretizeddataacquisitionmethodforcouchmodelingtostreamlinethecommissioningprocessofradiologicalinstruments
AT yoshinoritanabe evaluatingadiscretizeddataacquisitionmethodforcouchmodelingtostreamlinethecommissioningprocessofradiologicalinstruments