Socio-economic inequalities in access to COVID-19 tests in France in 2020: evidence from the EPICOV socio-epidemiological cohort

BackgroundTesting for COVID-19 has been strongly recommended for individuals experiencing COVID-19-like symptoms or those with a close relative who tested positive. In France, tests were free of charge until mid-October 2021 and became widely available after June 2020. Our main objective was to inve...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Pierre-Yves Geoffard, Florence Jusot, Antoine Sireyjol, Josiane Warszawski, Nathalie Bajos
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2025-01-01
Series:Frontiers in Public Health
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1434370/full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832590450791284736
author Pierre-Yves Geoffard
Pierre-Yves Geoffard
Florence Jusot
Antoine Sireyjol
Josiane Warszawski
Nathalie Bajos
author_facet Pierre-Yves Geoffard
Pierre-Yves Geoffard
Florence Jusot
Antoine Sireyjol
Josiane Warszawski
Nathalie Bajos
author_sort Pierre-Yves Geoffard
collection DOAJ
description BackgroundTesting for COVID-19 has been strongly recommended for individuals experiencing COVID-19-like symptoms or those with a close relative who tested positive. In France, tests were free of charge until mid-October 2021 and became widely available after June 2020. Our main objective was to investigate whether access to COVID-19 testing in France was associated with socio-economic conditions, considering gender and ethno-racial status.MethodsA random population-based cohort survey was conducted in France in May 2020 and November 2020, including 95,388 participants aged 18 and over. We used logistic regressions to identify how having been tested in 2020 was associated with socio-economic status and exposure factors among two groups of individuals. The first group consisted of individuals who had no close relative test positive but reported experiencing COVID-19-like symptoms, such as cough, fever, dyspnea, or sudden onset of ageusia, dysgeusia, or anosmia (N = 12,729). The second group included individuals, with or without symptoms, who reported that a close relative had tested positive for COVID-19 (N = 5,360).FindingsIn both groups, testing was more frequent among individuals living in urban areas. For individuals who had no close relative test positive but reported COVID-19-like symptoms, women were 1.04 (95%CI [1.01–1.06]) more likely than men to be tested, and testing decreased with age up to 35. Individuals holding a university degree were (1.08 [1.04–1.12]) more likely than those who only completed high school to be tested, as well as those in one of the three top income deciles with reference to the bottom decile (OR 1.07, [1.02–1.13] for the top decile). Ethno-racial status was not significantly associated with testing. For respondents who had a close relative test positive, testing was strongly associated with having experienced some symptoms, especially after September 1 (OR 1.34, 95%CI [1.30–1.39]). However, there was no link between testing and income, education, or ethno-racial status.InterpretationWhen an individual experiences symptoms but has no close relative who is positive, the motivation to test to avoid transmitting the virus to relatives by isolating oneself is particularly strong. This strategy makes sense when there are actual possibilities to isolate, which may explain why higher income and education positively impact the propensity to test. For individuals who had a close relative test positive, most socio-economic variables were no longer related to testing once infection risk was controlled for. The availability of tests at no cost is not sufficient in itself to eliminate socio-economic inequalities in testing.
format Article
id doaj-art-27a628a0fa7f43a8ac9fa9dcea6666aa
institution Kabale University
issn 2296-2565
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Public Health
spelling doaj-art-27a628a0fa7f43a8ac9fa9dcea6666aa2025-01-23T16:49:51ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Public Health2296-25652025-01-011210.3389/fpubh.2024.14343701434370Socio-economic inequalities in access to COVID-19 tests in France in 2020: evidence from the EPICOV socio-epidemiological cohortPierre-Yves Geoffard0Pierre-Yves Geoffard1Florence Jusot2Antoine Sireyjol3Josiane Warszawski4Nathalie Bajos5Paris School of Economics, Paris, FranceCNRS, Paris, FrancePSL Research University, Université Paris Dauphine, LEDA, UMR CNRS, Paris, FranceIRIS, Inserm/EHESS/CNRS, Aubervilliers, FranceCESP UMR, Université Paris-Saclay, APHP, le Kremlin-Bicêtre, FranceIRIS, Inserm/EHESS/CNRS, Aubervilliers, FranceBackgroundTesting for COVID-19 has been strongly recommended for individuals experiencing COVID-19-like symptoms or those with a close relative who tested positive. In France, tests were free of charge until mid-October 2021 and became widely available after June 2020. Our main objective was to investigate whether access to COVID-19 testing in France was associated with socio-economic conditions, considering gender and ethno-racial status.MethodsA random population-based cohort survey was conducted in France in May 2020 and November 2020, including 95,388 participants aged 18 and over. We used logistic regressions to identify how having been tested in 2020 was associated with socio-economic status and exposure factors among two groups of individuals. The first group consisted of individuals who had no close relative test positive but reported experiencing COVID-19-like symptoms, such as cough, fever, dyspnea, or sudden onset of ageusia, dysgeusia, or anosmia (N = 12,729). The second group included individuals, with or without symptoms, who reported that a close relative had tested positive for COVID-19 (N = 5,360).FindingsIn both groups, testing was more frequent among individuals living in urban areas. For individuals who had no close relative test positive but reported COVID-19-like symptoms, women were 1.04 (95%CI [1.01–1.06]) more likely than men to be tested, and testing decreased with age up to 35. Individuals holding a university degree were (1.08 [1.04–1.12]) more likely than those who only completed high school to be tested, as well as those in one of the three top income deciles with reference to the bottom decile (OR 1.07, [1.02–1.13] for the top decile). Ethno-racial status was not significantly associated with testing. For respondents who had a close relative test positive, testing was strongly associated with having experienced some symptoms, especially after September 1 (OR 1.34, 95%CI [1.30–1.39]). However, there was no link between testing and income, education, or ethno-racial status.InterpretationWhen an individual experiences symptoms but has no close relative who is positive, the motivation to test to avoid transmitting the virus to relatives by isolating oneself is particularly strong. This strategy makes sense when there are actual possibilities to isolate, which may explain why higher income and education positively impact the propensity to test. For individuals who had a close relative test positive, most socio-economic variables were no longer related to testing once infection risk was controlled for. The availability of tests at no cost is not sufficient in itself to eliminate socio-economic inequalities in testing.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1434370/fullCOVID-19socio-economic inequalitiestestingrandom surveyFrance
spellingShingle Pierre-Yves Geoffard
Pierre-Yves Geoffard
Florence Jusot
Antoine Sireyjol
Josiane Warszawski
Nathalie Bajos
Socio-economic inequalities in access to COVID-19 tests in France in 2020: evidence from the EPICOV socio-epidemiological cohort
Frontiers in Public Health
COVID-19
socio-economic inequalities
testing
random survey
France
title Socio-economic inequalities in access to COVID-19 tests in France in 2020: evidence from the EPICOV socio-epidemiological cohort
title_full Socio-economic inequalities in access to COVID-19 tests in France in 2020: evidence from the EPICOV socio-epidemiological cohort
title_fullStr Socio-economic inequalities in access to COVID-19 tests in France in 2020: evidence from the EPICOV socio-epidemiological cohort
title_full_unstemmed Socio-economic inequalities in access to COVID-19 tests in France in 2020: evidence from the EPICOV socio-epidemiological cohort
title_short Socio-economic inequalities in access to COVID-19 tests in France in 2020: evidence from the EPICOV socio-epidemiological cohort
title_sort socio economic inequalities in access to covid 19 tests in france in 2020 evidence from the epicov socio epidemiological cohort
topic COVID-19
socio-economic inequalities
testing
random survey
France
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1434370/full
work_keys_str_mv AT pierreyvesgeoffard socioeconomicinequalitiesinaccesstocovid19testsinfrancein2020evidencefromtheepicovsocioepidemiologicalcohort
AT pierreyvesgeoffard socioeconomicinequalitiesinaccesstocovid19testsinfrancein2020evidencefromtheepicovsocioepidemiologicalcohort
AT florencejusot socioeconomicinequalitiesinaccesstocovid19testsinfrancein2020evidencefromtheepicovsocioepidemiologicalcohort
AT antoinesireyjol socioeconomicinequalitiesinaccesstocovid19testsinfrancein2020evidencefromtheepicovsocioepidemiologicalcohort
AT josianewarszawski socioeconomicinequalitiesinaccesstocovid19testsinfrancein2020evidencefromtheepicovsocioepidemiologicalcohort
AT nathaliebajos socioeconomicinequalitiesinaccesstocovid19testsinfrancein2020evidencefromtheepicovsocioepidemiologicalcohort