Transcriptomic landscape around wound bed defines regenerative versus non-regenerative outcomes in mouse digit amputation.

In the mouse distal terminal phalanx (P3), it remains mystery why amputation at less than 33% of the digit results in regeneration, while amputation exceeding 67% leads to non-regeneration. Unraveling the molecular mechanisms underlying this disparity could provide crucial insights for regenerative...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Archana Prabahar, Connie S Chamberlain, Ray Vanderby, William L Murphy, William Dangelo, Kulkarni Mangesh, Bryan Brown, Barsanjit Mazumder, Stephen Badylak, Peng Jiang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2025-04-01
Series:PLoS Computational Biology
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012997
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850144938861264896
author Archana Prabahar
Connie S Chamberlain
Ray Vanderby
William L Murphy
William Dangelo
Kulkarni Mangesh
Bryan Brown
Barsanjit Mazumder
Stephen Badylak
Peng Jiang
author_facet Archana Prabahar
Connie S Chamberlain
Ray Vanderby
William L Murphy
William Dangelo
Kulkarni Mangesh
Bryan Brown
Barsanjit Mazumder
Stephen Badylak
Peng Jiang
author_sort Archana Prabahar
collection DOAJ
description In the mouse distal terminal phalanx (P3), it remains mystery why amputation at less than 33% of the digit results in regeneration, while amputation exceeding 67% leads to non-regeneration. Unraveling the molecular mechanisms underlying this disparity could provide crucial insights for regenerative medicine. In this study, we aim to investigate the tissues within the wound bed to understand the tissue microenvironment associated with regenerative versus non-regenerative outcomes. We employed a P3-specific amputation model in mice, integrated with time-series RNA-seq and a macrophage assay challenged with pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines, to explore these mechanisms. Our findings revealed that non-regenerative digits exhibit a greater intense early transcriptional response in the wound bed compared to regenerative ones. Furthermore, early macrophage phenotypes differ distinctly between regenerative and non-regenerative outcomes. Regenerative digits also display unique co-expression modules related to Bone Morphogenetic Protein 2 (Bmp2). The differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between regenerative and non-regenerative digits are enriched in targets of several transcription factors, such as HOXA11 and HOXD11 from the HOX gene family, showing a time-dependent pattern of enrichment. These transcription factors, known for their roles in bone regeneration, skeletal patterning, osteoblast activity, fracture healing, angiogenesis, and key signaling pathways, may act as master regulators of the regenerative gene signatures. Additionally, we developed a deep learning AI model capable of predicting post-amputation time and level from RNA-seq data, indicating that the regenerative probability may be "encoded" in the transcriptomic response to amputation.
format Article
id doaj-art-277653be6dcd4819b74fe6b49abca40a
institution OA Journals
issn 1553-734X
1553-7358
language English
publishDate 2025-04-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS Computational Biology
spelling doaj-art-277653be6dcd4819b74fe6b49abca40a2025-08-20T02:28:12ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS Computational Biology1553-734X1553-73582025-04-01214e101299710.1371/journal.pcbi.1012997Transcriptomic landscape around wound bed defines regenerative versus non-regenerative outcomes in mouse digit amputation.Archana PrabaharConnie S ChamberlainRay VanderbyWilliam L MurphyWilliam DangeloKulkarni MangeshBryan BrownBarsanjit MazumderStephen BadylakPeng JiangIn the mouse distal terminal phalanx (P3), it remains mystery why amputation at less than 33% of the digit results in regeneration, while amputation exceeding 67% leads to non-regeneration. Unraveling the molecular mechanisms underlying this disparity could provide crucial insights for regenerative medicine. In this study, we aim to investigate the tissues within the wound bed to understand the tissue microenvironment associated with regenerative versus non-regenerative outcomes. We employed a P3-specific amputation model in mice, integrated with time-series RNA-seq and a macrophage assay challenged with pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines, to explore these mechanisms. Our findings revealed that non-regenerative digits exhibit a greater intense early transcriptional response in the wound bed compared to regenerative ones. Furthermore, early macrophage phenotypes differ distinctly between regenerative and non-regenerative outcomes. Regenerative digits also display unique co-expression modules related to Bone Morphogenetic Protein 2 (Bmp2). The differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between regenerative and non-regenerative digits are enriched in targets of several transcription factors, such as HOXA11 and HOXD11 from the HOX gene family, showing a time-dependent pattern of enrichment. These transcription factors, known for their roles in bone regeneration, skeletal patterning, osteoblast activity, fracture healing, angiogenesis, and key signaling pathways, may act as master regulators of the regenerative gene signatures. Additionally, we developed a deep learning AI model capable of predicting post-amputation time and level from RNA-seq data, indicating that the regenerative probability may be "encoded" in the transcriptomic response to amputation.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012997
spellingShingle Archana Prabahar
Connie S Chamberlain
Ray Vanderby
William L Murphy
William Dangelo
Kulkarni Mangesh
Bryan Brown
Barsanjit Mazumder
Stephen Badylak
Peng Jiang
Transcriptomic landscape around wound bed defines regenerative versus non-regenerative outcomes in mouse digit amputation.
PLoS Computational Biology
title Transcriptomic landscape around wound bed defines regenerative versus non-regenerative outcomes in mouse digit amputation.
title_full Transcriptomic landscape around wound bed defines regenerative versus non-regenerative outcomes in mouse digit amputation.
title_fullStr Transcriptomic landscape around wound bed defines regenerative versus non-regenerative outcomes in mouse digit amputation.
title_full_unstemmed Transcriptomic landscape around wound bed defines regenerative versus non-regenerative outcomes in mouse digit amputation.
title_short Transcriptomic landscape around wound bed defines regenerative versus non-regenerative outcomes in mouse digit amputation.
title_sort transcriptomic landscape around wound bed defines regenerative versus non regenerative outcomes in mouse digit amputation
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012997
work_keys_str_mv AT archanaprabahar transcriptomiclandscapearoundwoundbeddefinesregenerativeversusnonregenerativeoutcomesinmousedigitamputation
AT connieschamberlain transcriptomiclandscapearoundwoundbeddefinesregenerativeversusnonregenerativeoutcomesinmousedigitamputation
AT rayvanderby transcriptomiclandscapearoundwoundbeddefinesregenerativeversusnonregenerativeoutcomesinmousedigitamputation
AT williamlmurphy transcriptomiclandscapearoundwoundbeddefinesregenerativeversusnonregenerativeoutcomesinmousedigitamputation
AT williamdangelo transcriptomiclandscapearoundwoundbeddefinesregenerativeversusnonregenerativeoutcomesinmousedigitamputation
AT kulkarnimangesh transcriptomiclandscapearoundwoundbeddefinesregenerativeversusnonregenerativeoutcomesinmousedigitamputation
AT bryanbrown transcriptomiclandscapearoundwoundbeddefinesregenerativeversusnonregenerativeoutcomesinmousedigitamputation
AT barsanjitmazumder transcriptomiclandscapearoundwoundbeddefinesregenerativeversusnonregenerativeoutcomesinmousedigitamputation
AT stephenbadylak transcriptomiclandscapearoundwoundbeddefinesregenerativeversusnonregenerativeoutcomesinmousedigitamputation
AT pengjiang transcriptomiclandscapearoundwoundbeddefinesregenerativeversusnonregenerativeoutcomesinmousedigitamputation