Optimizing breast lesions diagnosis and decision-making with a deep learning fusion model integrating ultrasound and mammography: a dual-center retrospective study

Abstract Background This study aimed to develop a BI-RADS network (DL-UM) via integrating ultrasound (US) and mammography (MG) images and explore its performance in improving breast lesion diagnosis and management when collaborating with radiologists, particularly in cases with discordant US and MG...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ziting Xu, Shengzhou Zhong, Yang Gao, Jiekun Huo, Weimin Xu, Weijun Huang, Xiaomei Huang, Chifa Zhang, Jianqiao Zhou, Qing Dan, Lian Li, Zhouyue Jiang, Ting Lang, Shuying Xu, Jiayin Lu, Ge Wen, Yu Zhang, Yingjia Li
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2025-05-01
Series:Breast Cancer Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13058-025-02033-6
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract Background This study aimed to develop a BI-RADS network (DL-UM) via integrating ultrasound (US) and mammography (MG) images and explore its performance in improving breast lesion diagnosis and management when collaborating with radiologists, particularly in cases with discordant US and MG Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) classifications. Methods We retrospectively collected image data from 1283 women with breast lesions who underwent both US and MG within one month at two medical centres and categorised them into concordant and discordant BI-RADS classification subgroups. We developed a DL-UM network via integrating US and MG images, and DL networks using US (DL-U) or MG (DL-M) alone, respectively. The performance of DL-UM network for breast lesion diagnosis was evaluated using ROC curves and compared to DL-U and DL-M networks in the external testing dataset. The diagnostic performance of radiologists with different levels of experience under the assistance of DL-UM network was also evaluated. Results In the external testing dataset, DL-UM outperformed DL-M in sensitivity (0.962 vs. 0.833, P = 0.016) and DL-U in specificity (0.667 vs. 0.526, P = 0.030), respectively. In the discordant BI-RADS classification subgroup, DL-UM achieved an AUC of 0.910. The diagnostic performance of four radiologists improved when collaborating with the DL-UM network, with AUCs increased from 0.674–0.772 to 0.889–0.910, specificities from 52.1%–75.0% to 81.3%–87.5% and reducing unnecessary biopsies by 16.1%–24.6%, particularly for junior radiologists. Meanwhile, DL-UM outputs and heatmaps enhanced radiologists’ trust and improved interobserver agreement between US and MG, with weighted kappa increased from 0.048 to 0.713 (P < 0.05). Conclusions The DL-UM network, integrating complementary US and MG features, assisted radiologists in improving breast lesion diagnosis and management, potentially reducing unnecessary biopsies.
ISSN:1465-542X