Owning the libs: Post-truth in right-wing political discourse

Emerging in scholarly discussions about political discourse over the past decade, the terms ‘post-truth’ and ‘denialism’ refer to disagreement not on public policy strategies but on the nature of truth itself. Policy facts are now contested in ways that disrupt mainstream political narratives and we...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Kris Hartley
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: OpenEdition 2023-04-01
Series:International Review of Public Policy
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.openedition.org/irpp/3510
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Emerging in scholarly discussions about political discourse over the past decade, the terms ‘post-truth’ and ‘denialism’ refer to disagreement not on public policy strategies but on the nature of truth itself. Policy facts are now contested in ways that disrupt mainstream political narratives and weaken institutional legitimacy. In turn, the technocratic response of doubling-down on facts is faltering as the ‘burn it down’ vacuity of post-truth declares equivalent political legitimacy. This strident, self-assured irrationality offers few substantive policy visions, seeking only to bewilder and ‘own’ its perceived enemies including progressive ‘elites,’ science experts, and academics trying to understand the phenomenon. This article discusses disruption in the political discourse about fact-informed policy issues, focusing on a looming period of epistemic instability and the futility of using systematic analysis and logic to understand post-truth.
ISSN:2679-3873
2706-6274