“Dialectical Contradictions” in the Neoclassical Theory and Policy Regarding Market Competition: The Consumer and His Continuos Burden of Crisis
In spite of the apparent general consensus, both economic theory in abstracto and the political practice in the realm of competition are looked upon from (too) many perspectives. Far from being convergent or even complementary, the “theories” and “policies” are rather contradictory and conflicting “...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Editura ASE
2017-05-01
|
| Series: | Amfiteatru Economic |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.amfiteatrueconomic.ro/temp/Article_2636.pdf |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1849702384344760320 |
|---|---|
| author | Octavian-Dragomir Jora Gheorghe Hurduzeu Mihaela Iacob Georgiana-Camelia Crețan Raluca-Elena Hurduzeu |
| author_facet | Octavian-Dragomir Jora Gheorghe Hurduzeu Mihaela Iacob Georgiana-Camelia Crețan Raluca-Elena Hurduzeu |
| author_sort | Octavian-Dragomir Jora |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | In spite of the apparent general consensus, both economic theory in abstracto and the political practice in the realm of competition are looked upon from (too) many perspectives. Far from being convergent or even complementary, the “theories” and “policies” are rather contradictory and conflicting “in” and “between” them. Nominally subsumed to the “consumer welfare”, the praise of competition and of its disciplinary power within the market economy (and twistingly even within the socialist one) has experienced between the eras of “classical” and “neoclassical” economic science a subtle transition from the paradigm of “freedom” to that of “perfection”. And the transition was accomplished with a significant risk of loss both in internal consistency and realistic adequacy, which undergo the fictional methodology as well as the mathematical formalism, endemic in the neoclassical approach. The tension inside the theorizing of competition cohabits with the one inside the policies’ camp: the regulations often seem to be at odds with the stated commitment towards the consumers (seen holistically and aggregately). Some of the real “flesh and blood” consumers become in fact passive objects of “pro-competition” coercive rearrangements of welfare in three hypostases that individuals (though unevenly) subsume: as “consumers” (of goods and services), as “competitors” (factors of production in labour markets) and as “citizens” (asymmetrically hit by the myriad of policies). This paper offers an “original recovery” of a common sense argument: after the mainstream imposition of “perfect” instead of “free” competition standard, the neoclassicism-inspired public policies end up promoting a competition climate heavily strained from both freedom and perfection. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-275877d31bdf4290b2df07e4520aa5cd |
| institution | DOAJ |
| issn | 1582-9146 2247-9104 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2017-05-01 |
| publisher | Editura ASE |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Amfiteatru Economic |
| spelling | doaj-art-275877d31bdf4290b2df07e4520aa5cd2025-08-20T03:17:40ZengEditura ASEAmfiteatru Economic1582-91462247-91042017-05-011945544565“Dialectical Contradictions” in the Neoclassical Theory and Policy Regarding Market Competition: The Consumer and His Continuos Burden of CrisisOctavian-Dragomir Jora0Gheorghe Hurduzeu1Mihaela Iacob2Georgiana-Camelia Crețan 3Raluca-Elena Hurduzeu 4Bucharest University of Economic StudiesThe Bucharest University of Economic Studies, RomaniaThe Bucharest University of Economic Studies, RomaniaThe Bucharest University of Economic Studies, RomaniaThe Bucharest University of Economic Studies, RomaniaIn spite of the apparent general consensus, both economic theory in abstracto and the political practice in the realm of competition are looked upon from (too) many perspectives. Far from being convergent or even complementary, the “theories” and “policies” are rather contradictory and conflicting “in” and “between” them. Nominally subsumed to the “consumer welfare”, the praise of competition and of its disciplinary power within the market economy (and twistingly even within the socialist one) has experienced between the eras of “classical” and “neoclassical” economic science a subtle transition from the paradigm of “freedom” to that of “perfection”. And the transition was accomplished with a significant risk of loss both in internal consistency and realistic adequacy, which undergo the fictional methodology as well as the mathematical formalism, endemic in the neoclassical approach. The tension inside the theorizing of competition cohabits with the one inside the policies’ camp: the regulations often seem to be at odds with the stated commitment towards the consumers (seen holistically and aggregately). Some of the real “flesh and blood” consumers become in fact passive objects of “pro-competition” coercive rearrangements of welfare in three hypostases that individuals (though unevenly) subsume: as “consumers” (of goods and services), as “competitors” (factors of production in labour markets) and as “citizens” (asymmetrically hit by the myriad of policies). This paper offers an “original recovery” of a common sense argument: after the mainstream imposition of “perfect” instead of “free” competition standard, the neoclassicism-inspired public policies end up promoting a competition climate heavily strained from both freedom and perfection.http://www.amfiteatrueconomic.ro/temp/Article_2636.pdffree competitionperfect competitionconsumerpublic policies |
| spellingShingle | Octavian-Dragomir Jora Gheorghe Hurduzeu Mihaela Iacob Georgiana-Camelia Crețan Raluca-Elena Hurduzeu “Dialectical Contradictions” in the Neoclassical Theory and Policy Regarding Market Competition: The Consumer and His Continuos Burden of Crisis Amfiteatru Economic free competition perfect competition consumer public policies |
| title | “Dialectical Contradictions” in the Neoclassical Theory and Policy Regarding Market Competition: The Consumer and His Continuos Burden of Crisis |
| title_full | “Dialectical Contradictions” in the Neoclassical Theory and Policy Regarding Market Competition: The Consumer and His Continuos Burden of Crisis |
| title_fullStr | “Dialectical Contradictions” in the Neoclassical Theory and Policy Regarding Market Competition: The Consumer and His Continuos Burden of Crisis |
| title_full_unstemmed | “Dialectical Contradictions” in the Neoclassical Theory and Policy Regarding Market Competition: The Consumer and His Continuos Burden of Crisis |
| title_short | “Dialectical Contradictions” in the Neoclassical Theory and Policy Regarding Market Competition: The Consumer and His Continuos Burden of Crisis |
| title_sort | dialectical contradictions in the neoclassical theory and policy regarding market competition the consumer and his continuos burden of crisis |
| topic | free competition perfect competition consumer public policies |
| url | http://www.amfiteatrueconomic.ro/temp/Article_2636.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT octaviandragomirjora dialecticalcontradictionsintheneoclassicaltheoryandpolicyregardingmarketcompetitiontheconsumerandhiscontinuosburdenofcrisis AT gheorghehurduzeu dialecticalcontradictionsintheneoclassicaltheoryandpolicyregardingmarketcompetitiontheconsumerandhiscontinuosburdenofcrisis AT mihaelaiacob dialecticalcontradictionsintheneoclassicaltheoryandpolicyregardingmarketcompetitiontheconsumerandhiscontinuosburdenofcrisis AT georgianacameliacretan dialecticalcontradictionsintheneoclassicaltheoryandpolicyregardingmarketcompetitiontheconsumerandhiscontinuosburdenofcrisis AT ralucaelenahurduzeu dialecticalcontradictionsintheneoclassicaltheoryandpolicyregardingmarketcompetitiontheconsumerandhiscontinuosburdenofcrisis |