Over 20‐Year Global Magnetohydrodynamic Simulation of Earth's Magnetosphere

Abstract We present our approach to modeling over 20 years of the solar wind‐magnetosphere‐ionosphere system using version 5 of the Grand Unified Magnetosphere‐Ionosphere Coupling Simulation (GUMICS‐5). As input we use 16‐s resolution magnetic field and 1‐min plasma measurements by Advanced Composit...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ilja Honkonen, Max van deKamp, Theresa Hoppe, Kirsti Kauristie
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2022-11-01
Series:Space Weather
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1029/2022SW003196
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841536312582078464
author Ilja Honkonen
Max van deKamp
Theresa Hoppe
Kirsti Kauristie
author_facet Ilja Honkonen
Max van deKamp
Theresa Hoppe
Kirsti Kauristie
author_sort Ilja Honkonen
collection DOAJ
description Abstract We present our approach to modeling over 20 years of the solar wind‐magnetosphere‐ionosphere system using version 5 of the Grand Unified Magnetosphere‐Ionosphere Coupling Simulation (GUMICS‐5). As input we use 16‐s resolution magnetic field and 1‐min plasma measurements by Advanced Composition Explorer satellite from 1998 to 2020. The modeled interval is divided into 28 hr simulations including 4 hr overlap. We use maximum magnetospheric resolution of 0.5 Earth radii (RE) up to about 15 RE from Earth and decreasing resolution further away. In the ionosphere we use a maximum resolution of approximately 100 km poleward of ±58° magnetic latitude and decreasing resolution toward equator. With respect to previous version GUMICS‐4, we have parallelized the magnetosphere of GUMICS‐5 using the Message Passing Interface and have made several improvements which have for example, decreased its numerical diffusion. In total we have performed over 8,000 simulations which have produced over 10,000,000 ionospheric files and 2,000,000 magnetospheric files requiring over 100 TB of disk space. We compare these results to several empirical models and geomagnetic indices derived from ground magnetic field measurements. GUMICS‐5 reproduces observed solar cycle trends in magnetopause stand‐off distance and magnetospheric lobe field strength but consistency in plasma sheet pressure and ionospheric cross‐polar cap potential is lower. Comparisons with geomagnetic indices show better results for Kp index than for auroral electrojet index. Our extensive results can serve, for example, as a foundation for combined physics‐based and black‐box approach to real‐time prediction of near‐Earth space, or as input to other physics‐based models of the inner magnetosphere, upper and middle atmosphere, etc.
format Article
id doaj-art-2736acb28b9a4c9282268672c1e72c3d
institution Kabale University
issn 1542-7390
language English
publishDate 2022-11-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Space Weather
spelling doaj-art-2736acb28b9a4c9282268672c1e72c3d2025-01-14T16:35:33ZengWileySpace Weather1542-73902022-11-012011n/an/a10.1029/2022SW003196Over 20‐Year Global Magnetohydrodynamic Simulation of Earth's MagnetosphereIlja Honkonen0Max van deKamp1Theresa Hoppe2Kirsti Kauristie3Finnish Meteorological Institute Helsinki FinlandFinnish Meteorological Institute Helsinki FinlandFinnish Meteorological Institute Helsinki FinlandFinnish Meteorological Institute Helsinki FinlandAbstract We present our approach to modeling over 20 years of the solar wind‐magnetosphere‐ionosphere system using version 5 of the Grand Unified Magnetosphere‐Ionosphere Coupling Simulation (GUMICS‐5). As input we use 16‐s resolution magnetic field and 1‐min plasma measurements by Advanced Composition Explorer satellite from 1998 to 2020. The modeled interval is divided into 28 hr simulations including 4 hr overlap. We use maximum magnetospheric resolution of 0.5 Earth radii (RE) up to about 15 RE from Earth and decreasing resolution further away. In the ionosphere we use a maximum resolution of approximately 100 km poleward of ±58° magnetic latitude and decreasing resolution toward equator. With respect to previous version GUMICS‐4, we have parallelized the magnetosphere of GUMICS‐5 using the Message Passing Interface and have made several improvements which have for example, decreased its numerical diffusion. In total we have performed over 8,000 simulations which have produced over 10,000,000 ionospheric files and 2,000,000 magnetospheric files requiring over 100 TB of disk space. We compare these results to several empirical models and geomagnetic indices derived from ground magnetic field measurements. GUMICS‐5 reproduces observed solar cycle trends in magnetopause stand‐off distance and magnetospheric lobe field strength but consistency in plasma sheet pressure and ionospheric cross‐polar cap potential is lower. Comparisons with geomagnetic indices show better results for Kp index than for auroral electrojet index. Our extensive results can serve, for example, as a foundation for combined physics‐based and black‐box approach to real‐time prediction of near‐Earth space, or as input to other physics‐based models of the inner magnetosphere, upper and middle atmosphere, etc.https://doi.org/10.1029/2022SW003196numerical modelingmagnetosphereionospheresolar windspace weatherspace climate
spellingShingle Ilja Honkonen
Max van deKamp
Theresa Hoppe
Kirsti Kauristie
Over 20‐Year Global Magnetohydrodynamic Simulation of Earth's Magnetosphere
Space Weather
numerical modeling
magnetosphere
ionosphere
solar wind
space weather
space climate
title Over 20‐Year Global Magnetohydrodynamic Simulation of Earth's Magnetosphere
title_full Over 20‐Year Global Magnetohydrodynamic Simulation of Earth's Magnetosphere
title_fullStr Over 20‐Year Global Magnetohydrodynamic Simulation of Earth's Magnetosphere
title_full_unstemmed Over 20‐Year Global Magnetohydrodynamic Simulation of Earth's Magnetosphere
title_short Over 20‐Year Global Magnetohydrodynamic Simulation of Earth's Magnetosphere
title_sort over 20 year global magnetohydrodynamic simulation of earth s magnetosphere
topic numerical modeling
magnetosphere
ionosphere
solar wind
space weather
space climate
url https://doi.org/10.1029/2022SW003196
work_keys_str_mv AT iljahonkonen over20yearglobalmagnetohydrodynamicsimulationofearthsmagnetosphere
AT maxvandekamp over20yearglobalmagnetohydrodynamicsimulationofearthsmagnetosphere
AT theresahoppe over20yearglobalmagnetohydrodynamicsimulationofearthsmagnetosphere
AT kirstikauristie over20yearglobalmagnetohydrodynamicsimulationofearthsmagnetosphere