Coupling governs entrainment range of circadian clocks

Abstract Circadian clocks are endogenous oscillators driving daily rhythms in physiology and behavior. Synchronization of these timers to environmental light–dark cycles (‘entrainment’) is crucial for an organism's fitness. Little is known about which oscillator qualities determine entrainment,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ute Abraham, Adrián E Granada, Pål O Westermark, Markus Heine, Achim Kramer, Hanspeter Herzel
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Springer Nature 2010-11-01
Series:Molecular Systems Biology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/msb.2010.92
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849225750777954304
author Ute Abraham
Adrián E Granada
Pål O Westermark
Markus Heine
Achim Kramer
Hanspeter Herzel
author_facet Ute Abraham
Adrián E Granada
Pål O Westermark
Markus Heine
Achim Kramer
Hanspeter Herzel
author_sort Ute Abraham
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Circadian clocks are endogenous oscillators driving daily rhythms in physiology and behavior. Synchronization of these timers to environmental light–dark cycles (‘entrainment’) is crucial for an organism's fitness. Little is known about which oscillator qualities determine entrainment, i.e., entrainment range, phase and amplitude. In a systematic theoretical and experimental study, we uncovered these qualities for circadian oscillators in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN—the master clock in mammals) and the lung (a peripheral clock): (i) the ratio between stimulus (zeitgeber) strength and oscillator amplitude and (ii) the rigidity of the oscillatory system (relaxation rate upon perturbation) determine entrainment properties. Coupling among oscillators affects both qualities resulting in increased amplitude and rigidity. These principles explain our experimental findings that lung clocks entrain to extreme zeitgeber cycles, whereas SCN clocks do not. We confirmed our theoretical predictions by showing that pharmacological inhibition of coupling in the SCN leads to larger ranges of entrainment. These differences between master and the peripheral clocks suggest that coupling‐induced rigidity in the SCN filters environmental noise to create a robust circadian system.
format Article
id doaj-art-26d76b0fdcfa40db85cbe3816d17fe4b
institution Kabale University
issn 1744-4292
language English
publishDate 2010-11-01
publisher Springer Nature
record_format Article
series Molecular Systems Biology
spelling doaj-art-26d76b0fdcfa40db85cbe3816d17fe4b2025-08-24T12:00:09ZengSpringer NatureMolecular Systems Biology1744-42922010-11-016111310.1038/msb.2010.92Coupling governs entrainment range of circadian clocksUte Abraham0Adrián E Granada1Pål O Westermark2Markus Heine3Achim Kramer4Hanspeter Herzel5Laboratory of Chronobiology, Charité Universitätsmedizin BerlinInstitute for Theoretical Biology, Humboldt University BerlinInstitute for Theoretical Biology, Humboldt University BerlinLaboratory of Chronobiology, Charité Universitätsmedizin BerlinLaboratory of Chronobiology, Charité Universitätsmedizin BerlinInstitute for Theoretical Biology, Humboldt University BerlinAbstract Circadian clocks are endogenous oscillators driving daily rhythms in physiology and behavior. Synchronization of these timers to environmental light–dark cycles (‘entrainment’) is crucial for an organism's fitness. Little is known about which oscillator qualities determine entrainment, i.e., entrainment range, phase and amplitude. In a systematic theoretical and experimental study, we uncovered these qualities for circadian oscillators in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN—the master clock in mammals) and the lung (a peripheral clock): (i) the ratio between stimulus (zeitgeber) strength and oscillator amplitude and (ii) the rigidity of the oscillatory system (relaxation rate upon perturbation) determine entrainment properties. Coupling among oscillators affects both qualities resulting in increased amplitude and rigidity. These principles explain our experimental findings that lung clocks entrain to extreme zeitgeber cycles, whereas SCN clocks do not. We confirmed our theoretical predictions by showing that pharmacological inhibition of coupling in the SCN leads to larger ranges of entrainment. These differences between master and the peripheral clocks suggest that coupling‐induced rigidity in the SCN filters environmental noise to create a robust circadian system.https://doi.org/10.1038/msb.2010.92circadian clockcouplingentrainmentmathematical modelingoscillatorregulation
spellingShingle Ute Abraham
Adrián E Granada
Pål O Westermark
Markus Heine
Achim Kramer
Hanspeter Herzel
Coupling governs entrainment range of circadian clocks
Molecular Systems Biology
circadian clock
coupling
entrainment
mathematical modeling
oscillatorregulation
title Coupling governs entrainment range of circadian clocks
title_full Coupling governs entrainment range of circadian clocks
title_fullStr Coupling governs entrainment range of circadian clocks
title_full_unstemmed Coupling governs entrainment range of circadian clocks
title_short Coupling governs entrainment range of circadian clocks
title_sort coupling governs entrainment range of circadian clocks
topic circadian clock
coupling
entrainment
mathematical modeling
oscillatorregulation
url https://doi.org/10.1038/msb.2010.92
work_keys_str_mv AT uteabraham couplinggovernsentrainmentrangeofcircadianclocks
AT adrianegranada couplinggovernsentrainmentrangeofcircadianclocks
AT palowestermark couplinggovernsentrainmentrangeofcircadianclocks
AT markusheine couplinggovernsentrainmentrangeofcircadianclocks
AT achimkramer couplinggovernsentrainmentrangeofcircadianclocks
AT hanspeterherzel couplinggovernsentrainmentrangeofcircadianclocks