Validity and reliability in qualitative research: A systematic review
Although validity and reliability evaluation has long been the focus of quantitative researchers, these concepts have been a discussion for qualitative researchers. Given that qualitative studies are conducted in the real world, they can have implications for people's lives. Therefore, it is ne...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | fas |
| Published: |
Iranian Research Institute for Information and Technology
2024-12-01
|
| Series: | Iranian Journal of Information Processing & Management |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://jipm.irandoc.ac.ir/article_717062_64aa16d064161671a3905aed4daa5dc3.pdf |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850270050615820288 |
|---|---|
| author | abbas abbasi leila Mohammadi khadijeh mohammadi |
| author_facet | abbas abbasi leila Mohammadi khadijeh mohammadi |
| author_sort | abbas abbasi |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Although validity and reliability evaluation has long been the focus of quantitative researchers, these concepts have been a discussion for qualitative researchers. Given that qualitative studies are conducted in the real world, they can have implications for people's lives. Therefore, it is necessary for the results of these studies to be reliable. So, the validity and reliability of these studies should be examined in order to gain the trust of the audience in the results of qualitative research and increase its credibility. Thus, this study was conducted with the aim of presenting a set of methods for evaluating validity and reliability in qualitative research. So, the interestting keywords were searched in the Web of Science database and 100 articles were extracted. After refining and reviewing the articles, 48 relevant articles were found on the subject, which formed the basis for data collection.Therefore, in this research, 55 qualitative methods and 4 quantitative methods for evaluating validity in qualitative research, as well as 13 qualitative methods and 6 quantitative methods for evaluating reliability in qualitative studies, were extracted from the articles. The results of this study can be used by qualitative researchers, qualitative article reviewers, and qualitative study audiences to judge the credibility of the results. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-26b778ab962b4b598f39b9aef38cb4f6 |
| institution | OA Journals |
| issn | 2251-8223 2251-8231 |
| language | fas |
| publishDate | 2024-12-01 |
| publisher | Iranian Research Institute for Information and Technology |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Iranian Journal of Information Processing & Management |
| spelling | doaj-art-26b778ab962b4b598f39b9aef38cb4f62025-08-20T01:52:49ZfasIranian Research Institute for Information and TechnologyIranian Journal of Information Processing & Management2251-82232251-82312024-12-0140210.22034/jipm.2024.717062717062Validity and reliability in qualitative research: A systematic reviewabbas abbasi0leila Mohammadi1khadijeh mohammadi2Associate Professor. Department of Management. Faculty of Economics, Management. Social Science. Shiraz University. Shiraz. Iran.PhD Student in Artificial Intelligence in Medical Sciences. Department of Artificial Intelligence in Medical Sciences. Faculty of Medicine. Shiraz university of medical sciences. Shiraz. Iran.PhD Student in Systems Management; Department of Industrial Management; Faculty of Economics, Management & Social Science; Shiraz University; Shiraz; Iran.Although validity and reliability evaluation has long been the focus of quantitative researchers, these concepts have been a discussion for qualitative researchers. Given that qualitative studies are conducted in the real world, they can have implications for people's lives. Therefore, it is necessary for the results of these studies to be reliable. So, the validity and reliability of these studies should be examined in order to gain the trust of the audience in the results of qualitative research and increase its credibility. Thus, this study was conducted with the aim of presenting a set of methods for evaluating validity and reliability in qualitative research. So, the interestting keywords were searched in the Web of Science database and 100 articles were extracted. After refining and reviewing the articles, 48 relevant articles were found on the subject, which formed the basis for data collection.Therefore, in this research, 55 qualitative methods and 4 quantitative methods for evaluating validity in qualitative research, as well as 13 qualitative methods and 6 quantitative methods for evaluating reliability in qualitative studies, were extracted from the articles. The results of this study can be used by qualitative researchers, qualitative article reviewers, and qualitative study audiences to judge the credibility of the results.https://jipm.irandoc.ac.ir/article_717062_64aa16d064161671a3905aed4daa5dc3.pdfqualitative researchvalidityreliabilitysystematic review |
| spellingShingle | abbas abbasi leila Mohammadi khadijeh mohammadi Validity and reliability in qualitative research: A systematic review Iranian Journal of Information Processing & Management qualitative research validity reliability systematic review |
| title | Validity and reliability in qualitative research: A systematic review |
| title_full | Validity and reliability in qualitative research: A systematic review |
| title_fullStr | Validity and reliability in qualitative research: A systematic review |
| title_full_unstemmed | Validity and reliability in qualitative research: A systematic review |
| title_short | Validity and reliability in qualitative research: A systematic review |
| title_sort | validity and reliability in qualitative research a systematic review |
| topic | qualitative research validity reliability systematic review |
| url | https://jipm.irandoc.ac.ir/article_717062_64aa16d064161671a3905aed4daa5dc3.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT abbasabbasi validityandreliabilityinqualitativeresearchasystematicreview AT leilamohammadi validityandreliabilityinqualitativeresearchasystematicreview AT khadijehmohammadi validityandreliabilityinqualitativeresearchasystematicreview |