Comparison of Some Spraying Characteristics by Testing Different Spray Nozzle Positions on Artificial Cotton Plants when Defoliant Application
In this study, limit application rates and different spray nozzle positions effects on coverage rate, drop diameter and amount of tracer residue values were determined of application defoliating agent before machine harvest on cotton plant. Researches were carried on two phases as indoor area trials...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Hasan Eleroğlu
2023-04-01
|
| Series: | Turkish Journal of Agriculture: Food Science and Technology |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.agrifoodscience.com/index.php/TURJAF/article/view/5948 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850228948952154112 |
|---|---|
| author | Keziban Yalçın Dokumacı Cengiz Özarslan |
| author_facet | Keziban Yalçın Dokumacı Cengiz Özarslan |
| author_sort | Keziban Yalçın Dokumacı |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | In this study, limit application rates and different spray nozzle positions effects on coverage rate, drop diameter and amount of tracer residue values were determined of application defoliating agent before machine harvest on cotton plant. Researches were carried on two phases as indoor area trials and laboratory analysis. In these researches, artificial cotton plants were used. Indoor area trials were conducted two different application rates (20 and 40 L da-1) and three different in spray nozzle positions (NP1, NP2 and NP3) by using conventional hollow cone spray nozzle. 27 pieces of sampling area were determined that they were included the two sides of the plant and plant center position of the upper-middle-lower in initiative area on plants. Six initiative areas were determined in order to record efficiency in initiative area on plants. For the purpose of deposition of trace amounts of substances were determined in sampling area; water-sensitive paper is placed on top that included both over the leaves and beneath the leaves in order to detect each filter paper, and drop diameter, rate of coverage. The amount of deposit on areas that were done analysis in laboratory conditions was determined to with spectrophotometer. Drop diameters and coverage rate detection were done analysis on image analysis. According to the results, it is determined that NP3 which is used generally in 40 L da-1 norm provide the best deposition and coverage rate on applications of defoliant, in addition to pesticide reach on leaf beneath in merely this spray nozzle position. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-266e15ade4b24eac9c064eac5aecfcf1 |
| institution | OA Journals |
| issn | 2148-127X |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2023-04-01 |
| publisher | Hasan Eleroğlu |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Turkish Journal of Agriculture: Food Science and Technology |
| spelling | doaj-art-266e15ade4b24eac9c064eac5aecfcf12025-08-20T02:04:23ZengHasan EleroğluTurkish Journal of Agriculture: Food Science and Technology2148-127X2023-04-0111478579010.24925/turjaf.v11i4.785-790.59484659Comparison of Some Spraying Characteristics by Testing Different Spray Nozzle Positions on Artificial Cotton Plants when Defoliant ApplicationKeziban Yalçın Dokumacı0https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9699-8861Cengiz Özarslan1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1156-2362Selcuk University, Faculty of Agriculture, Dept. of Agricultural Machinery and Technologies Engineering, 42130, KonyaAydın Adnan Menderes University, Faculty of Agriculture, Dept. of Biosystem Engineering, 09100, AydınIn this study, limit application rates and different spray nozzle positions effects on coverage rate, drop diameter and amount of tracer residue values were determined of application defoliating agent before machine harvest on cotton plant. Researches were carried on two phases as indoor area trials and laboratory analysis. In these researches, artificial cotton plants were used. Indoor area trials were conducted two different application rates (20 and 40 L da-1) and three different in spray nozzle positions (NP1, NP2 and NP3) by using conventional hollow cone spray nozzle. 27 pieces of sampling area were determined that they were included the two sides of the plant and plant center position of the upper-middle-lower in initiative area on plants. Six initiative areas were determined in order to record efficiency in initiative area on plants. For the purpose of deposition of trace amounts of substances were determined in sampling area; water-sensitive paper is placed on top that included both over the leaves and beneath the leaves in order to detect each filter paper, and drop diameter, rate of coverage. The amount of deposit on areas that were done analysis in laboratory conditions was determined to with spectrophotometer. Drop diameters and coverage rate detection were done analysis on image analysis. According to the results, it is determined that NP3 which is used generally in 40 L da-1 norm provide the best deposition and coverage rate on applications of defoliant, in addition to pesticide reach on leaf beneath in merely this spray nozzle position.http://www.agrifoodscience.com/index.php/TURJAF/article/view/5948defoliantconventional hollow conecoverage ratedroplet sizetracer deposit |
| spellingShingle | Keziban Yalçın Dokumacı Cengiz Özarslan Comparison of Some Spraying Characteristics by Testing Different Spray Nozzle Positions on Artificial Cotton Plants when Defoliant Application Turkish Journal of Agriculture: Food Science and Technology defoliant conventional hollow cone coverage rate droplet size tracer deposit |
| title | Comparison of Some Spraying Characteristics by Testing Different Spray Nozzle Positions on Artificial Cotton Plants when Defoliant Application |
| title_full | Comparison of Some Spraying Characteristics by Testing Different Spray Nozzle Positions on Artificial Cotton Plants when Defoliant Application |
| title_fullStr | Comparison of Some Spraying Characteristics by Testing Different Spray Nozzle Positions on Artificial Cotton Plants when Defoliant Application |
| title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Some Spraying Characteristics by Testing Different Spray Nozzle Positions on Artificial Cotton Plants when Defoliant Application |
| title_short | Comparison of Some Spraying Characteristics by Testing Different Spray Nozzle Positions on Artificial Cotton Plants when Defoliant Application |
| title_sort | comparison of some spraying characteristics by testing different spray nozzle positions on artificial cotton plants when defoliant application |
| topic | defoliant conventional hollow cone coverage rate droplet size tracer deposit |
| url | http://www.agrifoodscience.com/index.php/TURJAF/article/view/5948 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT kezibanyalcındokumacı comparisonofsomesprayingcharacteristicsbytestingdifferentspraynozzlepositionsonartificialcottonplantswhendefoliantapplication AT cengizozarslan comparisonofsomesprayingcharacteristicsbytestingdifferentspraynozzlepositionsonartificialcottonplantswhendefoliantapplication |