Optimal Embryo Selection: The Irreplaceable Role of the Embryologist in an Age of Advancing Technology

Background: Time-lapse incubators allow for ongoing evaluation of embryos without culture condition disruption. The use of time-lapse incubation has been shown to improve outcomes either by improving overall conditions or providing additional information to aid in embryo selection for transfer. Time...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lauren Kendall Rauchfuss, Yulian Zhao, David Walker, Terri Galantis, Jolene Fredrickson, Kathrynne Barud, Chandra Shenoy
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2023-07-01
Series:Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/jhrs.jhrs_98_23
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1823860943243706368
author Lauren Kendall Rauchfuss
Yulian Zhao
David Walker
Terri Galantis
Jolene Fredrickson
Kathrynne Barud
Chandra Shenoy
author_facet Lauren Kendall Rauchfuss
Yulian Zhao
David Walker
Terri Galantis
Jolene Fredrickson
Kathrynne Barud
Chandra Shenoy
author_sort Lauren Kendall Rauchfuss
collection DOAJ
description Background: Time-lapse incubators allow for ongoing evaluation of embryos without culture condition disruption. The use of time-lapse incubation has been shown to improve outcomes either by improving overall conditions or providing additional information to aid in embryo selection for transfer. Time-lapse incubators can also utilise morphokinetic models to rank embryos based on morphokinetic parameters. We sought to compare a morphokinetic model for embryo comparison to traditional morphologic evaluation. Aims: The aim of the study is to compare a morphokinetic model for embryo comparison to traditional morphologic evaluation. Settings and Design: This is a retrospective cohort design. Materials and Methods: Embryos cultured in a time-lapse culture system that had traditional morphologic evaluation, morphokinetic modelling and known live birth outcomes were included in this study. Embryos with unknown competence were excluded, including when two embryos were transferred with a single live birth resulted. Statistical Analysis Used: Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were determined for both the morphologic analysis and the morphokinetic model on culture day 3 and day 5. Using the ROC-determined cutoff that optimised both sensitivity and specificity, a binary outcome for each test was analysed using agreement statistics to determine if one method of embryo evaluation was superior to the other. Results: Morphological and morphokinetic grading were both predictive of embryo competence on days 3 and 5. However, on day 3, morphologic grading was superior to morphokinetic grading with area under the curve (AUC) of 0.66 (P < 0.001) and 0.58 (P = 0.009), respectively. Contrarily, on day 5, the morphokinetic model had a higher AUC of 0.65 (P = 0.03) compared to the morphologic grading, AUC 0.56 (P = 0.02). Conclusion: Traditional morphology was noted to be a better diagnostic tool (higher AUC) on culture day 3 while a morphokinetic model was superior on day 5.
format Article
id doaj-art-266396763de24ac2a47fd025d4a83f54
institution Kabale University
issn 0974-1208
1998-4766
language English
publishDate 2023-07-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences
spelling doaj-art-266396763de24ac2a47fd025d4a83f542025-02-10T07:46:27ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Human Reproductive Sciences0974-12081998-47662023-07-0116322723210.4103/jhrs.jhrs_98_23Optimal Embryo Selection: The Irreplaceable Role of the Embryologist in an Age of Advancing TechnologyLauren Kendall RauchfussYulian ZhaoDavid WalkerTerri GalantisJolene FredricksonKathrynne BarudChandra ShenoyBackground: Time-lapse incubators allow for ongoing evaluation of embryos without culture condition disruption. The use of time-lapse incubation has been shown to improve outcomes either by improving overall conditions or providing additional information to aid in embryo selection for transfer. Time-lapse incubators can also utilise morphokinetic models to rank embryos based on morphokinetic parameters. We sought to compare a morphokinetic model for embryo comparison to traditional morphologic evaluation. Aims: The aim of the study is to compare a morphokinetic model for embryo comparison to traditional morphologic evaluation. Settings and Design: This is a retrospective cohort design. Materials and Methods: Embryos cultured in a time-lapse culture system that had traditional morphologic evaluation, morphokinetic modelling and known live birth outcomes were included in this study. Embryos with unknown competence were excluded, including when two embryos were transferred with a single live birth resulted. Statistical Analysis Used: Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were determined for both the morphologic analysis and the morphokinetic model on culture day 3 and day 5. Using the ROC-determined cutoff that optimised both sensitivity and specificity, a binary outcome for each test was analysed using agreement statistics to determine if one method of embryo evaluation was superior to the other. Results: Morphological and morphokinetic grading were both predictive of embryo competence on days 3 and 5. However, on day 3, morphologic grading was superior to morphokinetic grading with area under the curve (AUC) of 0.66 (P < 0.001) and 0.58 (P = 0.009), respectively. Contrarily, on day 5, the morphokinetic model had a higher AUC of 0.65 (P = 0.03) compared to the morphologic grading, AUC 0.56 (P = 0.02). Conclusion: Traditional morphology was noted to be a better diagnostic tool (higher AUC) on culture day 3 while a morphokinetic model was superior on day 5.https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/jhrs.jhrs_98_23embryoscopemorphokineticsmorphologic grading
spellingShingle Lauren Kendall Rauchfuss
Yulian Zhao
David Walker
Terri Galantis
Jolene Fredrickson
Kathrynne Barud
Chandra Shenoy
Optimal Embryo Selection: The Irreplaceable Role of the Embryologist in an Age of Advancing Technology
Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences
embryoscope
morphokinetics
morphologic grading
title Optimal Embryo Selection: The Irreplaceable Role of the Embryologist in an Age of Advancing Technology
title_full Optimal Embryo Selection: The Irreplaceable Role of the Embryologist in an Age of Advancing Technology
title_fullStr Optimal Embryo Selection: The Irreplaceable Role of the Embryologist in an Age of Advancing Technology
title_full_unstemmed Optimal Embryo Selection: The Irreplaceable Role of the Embryologist in an Age of Advancing Technology
title_short Optimal Embryo Selection: The Irreplaceable Role of the Embryologist in an Age of Advancing Technology
title_sort optimal embryo selection the irreplaceable role of the embryologist in an age of advancing technology
topic embryoscope
morphokinetics
morphologic grading
url https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/jhrs.jhrs_98_23
work_keys_str_mv AT laurenkendallrauchfuss optimalembryoselectiontheirreplaceableroleoftheembryologistinanageofadvancingtechnology
AT yulianzhao optimalembryoselectiontheirreplaceableroleoftheembryologistinanageofadvancingtechnology
AT davidwalker optimalembryoselectiontheirreplaceableroleoftheembryologistinanageofadvancingtechnology
AT terrigalantis optimalembryoselectiontheirreplaceableroleoftheembryologistinanageofadvancingtechnology
AT jolenefredrickson optimalembryoselectiontheirreplaceableroleoftheembryologistinanageofadvancingtechnology
AT kathrynnebarud optimalembryoselectiontheirreplaceableroleoftheembryologistinanageofadvancingtechnology
AT chandrashenoy optimalembryoselectiontheirreplaceableroleoftheembryologistinanageofadvancingtechnology